Patient Reported Outcomes Targeting Early Chest Tube Removal (PROTECTR) Study

NCT ID: NCT06444854

Last Updated: 2024-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-22

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a single centre, prospective clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of implementing a same day chest tube removal protocol in patients undergoing Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) anatomical pulmonary surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pulmonary resections are performed for a multitude of diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. The last decade has seen a rapid advancement of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches which have resulted in improved patient outcomes. However, the post-operative care pathways have not evolved sufficiently to account for these changes. As such, many patients are still admitted after a minor lung resection for monitoring with a chest tube remaining in situ for a minimum of 24 hours. There have been a few retrospective cohort studies that demonstrate that patients do not experience significant complications during that 24-hour period that would warrant hospitalization. However, there have been no prospective controlled studies evaluating the safety and feasibility of early chest tube removal and discharge after a wedge resection. Furthermore, the maintenance of a large bore chest tube for an extended period is a cause for increased patient discomfort, increased narcotic use and may contribute to chronic pain secondary to intercostal nerve compression. As such, the prolonged chest tube maintenance and hospitalization may overall result in more patient harm than benefit.

Our group recently completed and presented a prospective safety and feasibility study demonstrating that chest tubes can be discontinued as early as 3 hours after minor MIS wedge resections of the lung with no adverse events. This study validated safety criteria that will be implemented moving forward. Furthermore, the maintenance of a large bore chest tube for an extended period is a cause for increased patient discomfort, increased narcotic use and may contribute to chronic pain secondary to intercostal nerve compression. As such, the prolonged chest tube maintenance and hospitalization may overall result in more patient harm than benefit. In the study mentioned previously, early chest tube removal led to 40% more patients being opioid free at post operative day 1 compared to those who underwent routine care.

Nevertheless, it is unclear if patients who undergo more extensive surgeries involving vascular dissection and longer operative times (i.e., pulmonary lobectomies and segmentectomies) will derive the same benefit. The incisions required to complete more complex operations are also larger compared to wedge resections. As such the pain associated with having a chest tube may or may not be as apparent in the setting of the larger incision. It is also unclear what the long-term impact of early chest tube removal has on quality of life in the perioperative period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Surgery Chest Tube Removal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study is a single centre, prospective clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early Chest Tube Removal

early chest tube removal at 3 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

early chest tube removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Chest tube removal

Standard of Care

Routine post operative chest tube care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

early chest tube removal

Chest tube removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 yrs or older
* scheduled to undergo elective VATS segmental or lobar resection of the lung

Exclusion Criteria

* Pulmonary function tests demonstrating forced expiratory volume in 1 second Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) \<50% predicted, FEV1 \<1.5L and/or diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide Lung Diffusion Test (DLCO) \<50% predicted
* Patient receives an intraoperative pleurodesis
* Conversion to open thoracotomy or mini thoracotomy intraoperatively.
* Underlying cognitive disorder resulting in inability to complete activities of daily living.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rahul Nayak

Director of Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rahul Nayak, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Deb Lewis

Role: CONTACT

5196858500 ext. 75685

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Deb Lewis

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PROTECTR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outside the Cage (OTC) Robotic Lobectomy
NCT05832112 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA