Patient Reported Outcomes Targeting Early Chest Tube Removal (PROTECTR) Study
NCT ID: NCT06444854
Last Updated: 2024-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-22
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Optimal Technique for Chest Tube Removal
NCT00873587
Safety of Early Removal of Chest Tubes After Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsies
NCT02727218
Early Chest Tube Removal After Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06411431
Effects of Local Protocols on Duration of Chest Tube Therapy Following Thoracic Surgery
NCT01467622
Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?
NCT03093610
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our group recently completed and presented a prospective safety and feasibility study demonstrating that chest tubes can be discontinued as early as 3 hours after minor MIS wedge resections of the lung with no adverse events. This study validated safety criteria that will be implemented moving forward. Furthermore, the maintenance of a large bore chest tube for an extended period is a cause for increased patient discomfort, increased narcotic use and may contribute to chronic pain secondary to intercostal nerve compression. As such, the prolonged chest tube maintenance and hospitalization may overall result in more patient harm than benefit. In the study mentioned previously, early chest tube removal led to 40% more patients being opioid free at post operative day 1 compared to those who underwent routine care.
Nevertheless, it is unclear if patients who undergo more extensive surgeries involving vascular dissection and longer operative times (i.e., pulmonary lobectomies and segmentectomies) will derive the same benefit. The incisions required to complete more complex operations are also larger compared to wedge resections. As such the pain associated with having a chest tube may or may not be as apparent in the setting of the larger incision. It is also unclear what the long-term impact of early chest tube removal has on quality of life in the perioperative period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early Chest Tube Removal
early chest tube removal at 3 hours
early chest tube removal
Chest tube removal
Standard of Care
Routine post operative chest tube care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
early chest tube removal
Chest tube removal
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* scheduled to undergo elective VATS segmental or lobar resection of the lung
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient receives an intraoperative pleurodesis
* Conversion to open thoracotomy or mini thoracotomy intraoperatively.
* Underlying cognitive disorder resulting in inability to complete activities of daily living.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rahul Nayak
Director of Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rahul Nayak, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PROTECTR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.