Study of Postoperative Chest Tube Management

NCT ID: NCT02282462

Last Updated: 2020-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A 2 x 2 randomized study testing active versus passive drainage and regulated versus unregulated pleural pressure in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, multi-center randomized clinical trial at 6 sites. Pre-operative evaluation and the decision for surgical intervention will proceed as currently performed at each center. That is, neither inclusion in nor exclusion from this study will affect the plan of care for patients other than the approach to chest tube management, which is determined by randomization among 4 methods that are in common clinical use. Each enrolled patient will be randomized to either regulated pleural pressure using the Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device or unregulated pleural pressure using a traditional system (multi-chambered system e.g. Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar device as is routine at each institution) and also randomized to either active suction (-20 cm H2O) or passive drainage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Resection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Reg pressure, Active suction (Dig)

Regulated pleural pressure with active suction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reg Pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

Regulated Suction using the Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device

Active Suction (Dig)

Intervention Type OTHER

Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device set at -20cmH2O at the patient

Reg pressure, Passive drainage (Dig)

Regulated pleural pressure with passive drainage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reg Pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

Regulated Suction using the Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device

Passive Drainage (Dig)

Intervention Type OTHER

Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device set at -8cmH2O at the patient ("physiologic")

Unreg pressure, Active suction (Trad)

Unregulated pleural pressure with active suction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unreg Pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

Unregulated Suction using a traditional system (multi-chambered system e.g. Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar device as is routine at each institution)

Active Suction (Trad)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar set at -20cmH2O at the device.

Unreg pressure, Passive drainage (Trad)

Unregulated pleural pressure with passive drainage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unreg Pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

Unregulated Suction using a traditional system (multi-chambered system e.g. Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar device as is routine at each institution)

Passive Drainage (Trad)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar set by gravity ("water-seal')

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reg Pressure

Regulated Suction using the Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device

Intervention Type OTHER

Unreg Pressure

Unregulated Suction using a traditional system (multi-chambered system e.g. Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar device as is routine at each institution)

Intervention Type OTHER

Active Suction (Dig)

Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device set at -20cmH2O at the patient

Intervention Type OTHER

Active Suction (Trad)

Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar set at -20cmH2O at the device.

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Drainage (Dig)

Thopaz+ digital chest drainage device set at -8cmH2O at the patient ("physiologic")

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Drainage (Trad)

Pleur-Evac, Atrium-Maquet or similar set by gravity ("water-seal')

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able and willing to read, understand, and provide written consent
* Age 18-90
* Undergoing a segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy (including sleeve resection). Both open and minimally invasive (thoracoscopic or robotic) resections are acceptable

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unstable enough to require ICU care for hemodynamic or respiratory problems during the first 7 days postoperatively. Patients admitted to the ICU for other reasons (e.g. bed availability, institutional norm, routine monitoring etc.) should NOT be excluded
* Patients undergoing non-anatomic lung resection only (i.e. wedge resection)
* Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for bullous disease, lung abscess or bronchiectasis.
* Patients undergoing pneumonectomy or completion pneumonectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medela AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank Detterbeck, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

WellStar Health System - Kennestone

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess/ Harvard

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Valley Health System

Paramus, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Hospital

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1411014891

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.