Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
95 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-24
2025-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does the Turkish adaptation (DDKGÖ) demonstrate acceptable cultural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability in measuring balance recovery confidence?
How does the DDKGÖ correlate with established tools assessing fear of falling, balance confidence, and physical performance (e.g., FES-I, ABC, TUG) to confirm convergent validity?
Participants will:
Complete the DDKGÖ questionnaire twice (7 days apart) to assess test-retest reliability.
Undergo physical performance tests (e.g., Timed Up and Go, Handgrip Strength Test, 30-Second Chair Stand Test).
Provide responses to additional self-report scales (FES-I, ABC) to evaluate convergent validity.
This study focuses on community-dwelling older adults without severe cognitive or physical impairments. Results will help standardize the DDKGÖ as a tool for identifying fall risk and personalizing rehabilitation strategies in Turkish geriatric populations.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Tinetti Fall Efficacy Scale in Older People
NCT05072366
Effects of Action Observation Training and Exercises Over 65 Years Old
NCT04759690
Occupation-Based Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Fall Risk in Older Adults
NCT07258355
The Discriminative Ability of the Four Balance Measures for Fall History
NCT04334746
Investigation of the Relationship Between Sarcopenia and Balance, Fear of Falling and Fall Risk in Older Female Patients
NCT06277193
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During Phase 1, each participant will complete a structured interview and self-report questionnaires in a single session. These include the 19-item DDKGÖ (to assess reactive balance confidence), the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale. Trained assessors will also record demographic and health information (e.g., age, sex, comorbidities, history of falls) and administer a battery of standardized performance tests-such as the Timed Up and Go, 30-Second Chair Stand, Tinetti Balance \& Gait, and Handgrip Strength tests-to evaluate convergent validity.
Exactly seven days later, in Phase 2, participants will return to repeat the DDKGÖ under identical conditions to evaluate test-retest stability. All sessions will be conducted in the same clinical setting by the same examiners, using standardized instructions and order of administration to minimize procedural variability.
Collected data will be anonymized and entered into a secure database. Statistical analyses will include exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to examine structural validity, calculation of internal consistency (e.g., Cronbach's α), intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability, Bland-Altman limits of agreement to quantify measurement error, and correlation analyses with existing balance- and fear-of-fall measures and performance tests to establish convergent validity.
By following this stepwise process-translation verification, initial validity and reliability testing, and retest assessment-this study will provide a comprehensive evaluation of whether the DDKGÖ is suitable for use in both research and clinical practice to identify older Turkish adults at elevated fall risk and to monitor changes in their confidence to recover from postural disturbances.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Community-dwelling individuals capable of independent living (use of walking aids permitted).
* Literate in Turkish.
* Ability to complete 6 meters of walking within 12 seconds.
* Ability to grasp a 30 cm ruler with both hands.
Exclusion Criteria
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤23.
* Timed Up and Go (TUG) test duration \>12 seconds.
* Active malignancy or history of myocardial infarction/cardiac surgery within the last 3 months.
* Structural heart disease, severe COPD, or oxygen dependence.
* Musculoskeletal/neurologic disorders affecting balance or muscle function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke sequelae, multiple sclerosis, severe dementia, epilepsy).
* Fracture within the last 6 months.
* Vision or hearing loss impairing assessment participation.
* Inability to provide informed consent.
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Necmettin Erbakan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdulkadir dağbaşı
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
abdulkadir dağbaşı
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Necmettin Erbakan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Necmettin Erbakan University
Konya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soh SL, Tan CW, Xu T, Yeh TT, Bte Abdul Rahman F, Soon B, Gleeson N, Lane J. The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) Scale. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Mar 3;40(3):658-669. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2135420. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ADagbasi003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.