Trunk Control, Balance, Gait, Functional Mobility and Fear of Falling in People With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT ID: NCT05576688
Last Updated: 2022-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2022-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Balance, an essential motor skill necessary to perform both static and dynamic everyday activities with stability and security, is impaired in people with Alzheimer's disease when compared to cognitively preserved elderlies. Gait and functional mobility disorders are also observed in people with Alzheimer's disease from the early period of the disease. People with Alzheimer's disease tend to fall more often and are more seriously injured from falls than cognitively intact older adults. The annual incidence rate for falling is 60% to 80% for older adults with Alzheimer's disease, over twice the incidence of age-matched cognitively intact older adults.
Trunk control is shown among the most important factors that ensure the balance and walking of the individual in different environments and conditions during functional activities. Optimal trunk control relies on adequate somatosensory, motor, and musculoskeletal systems, which are frequently compromised in people with Alzheimer's disease. For this reason, the investigators think that trunk control may be affected in people with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy older adults and may be related to balance, gait, functional mobility and fear of falling.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Kinesiophobia, Balance, Falling and Walking Speeds of Elderly's With Physical Frailty With Alzheimer's
NCT05761665
Determination of Walking, Balance, Fall Risk and Kinesiophobia in Individulas with Alzheimer's Dementation
NCT05201768
Examining the Relationship Between the Presence of Kinesiophobia in Stroke Patients and Balance, Gait, Pain, and Social Participation Levels
NCT06202287
Kinesiophobia and Balance in Stroke Patients
NCT07241429
The Effect of Lower Extremity Strengthening Exercises Versus Trunk Strengthening Exercises
NCT05210296
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
35 people with Alzheimer's disease and 33 healthy older adults with matching ages and genders were included the study. Trunk control with Trunk Impairment Scale; balance with Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test, One-Leg Standing Test and Five-Repeat Sit-and-Stand Test; gait with Dynamic Gait Index; functional mobility with Timed Up and Go Test; fear of falling with Falls Efficacy Scale-International were evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Alzheimer's disease
People with Alzheimer's disease who were diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease according to NINCDS/ARDRA diagnostic criteria by a neurologist and whose cognitive level was between 18-23 points according to Mini Mental State Examination.
Balance
Balance was evaluated with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), One Leg Stance Test (OLST) and Five-Repeat Sit-and-Stand Test (5STS). BBS consists of 14 functional tasks of increasing difficulty, each scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 4. The maximum possible score is 56, indicating no identifiable balance difficulties. FRT measures the maximum distance that participants can reach forward with their dominant arm raised to 90 degrees without moving their feet, which were positioned 10 cm apart. OLST measures the time one is able to stand on one lower limb without support. The test was repeated for both sides. 5STS assesses the time it takes to get up and sit from the chair five times. Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average duration was calculated as a patient score.
Trunk control
Trunk control was evaluated with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS).TIS evaluates static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination on a scale from 0 to 23 points, a higher score indicating a better performance.
Gait
Gait was evaluated with Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). DGI has 8 items: walking, walking while changing speed, walking while turning the head horizontally and vertically, walking with pivot turn, walking over and around obstacles, and stair climbing. The scoring of the DGI is based on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ability. The best performance total score is 24. A low composite DGI score indicates greater impairment in gait.
Functional mobility
Functional mobility was evaluated with Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). TUG is a test of the time required for an individual to stand up from a chair with armrests, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The stopwatch timing started when the participant's bottom left the chair and ended when the bottom made contact with the chair after the walk.
Fear of falling
Fear of falling was evaluated with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). FES-I was used to assess the level of concern about falls during 16 activities of daily living, ranging from basic to more demanding activities including social activities that may contribute to quality of life. It was administered as a self-report questionnaire.
Healthy older adults
33 healthy older adults with matching ages and gender.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Balance
Balance was evaluated with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), One Leg Stance Test (OLST) and Five-Repeat Sit-and-Stand Test (5STS). BBS consists of 14 functional tasks of increasing difficulty, each scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 4. The maximum possible score is 56, indicating no identifiable balance difficulties. FRT measures the maximum distance that participants can reach forward with their dominant arm raised to 90 degrees without moving their feet, which were positioned 10 cm apart. OLST measures the time one is able to stand on one lower limb without support. The test was repeated for both sides. 5STS assesses the time it takes to get up and sit from the chair five times. Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average duration was calculated as a patient score.
Trunk control
Trunk control was evaluated with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS).TIS evaluates static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination on a scale from 0 to 23 points, a higher score indicating a better performance.
Gait
Gait was evaluated with Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). DGI has 8 items: walking, walking while changing speed, walking while turning the head horizontally and vertically, walking with pivot turn, walking over and around obstacles, and stair climbing. The scoring of the DGI is based on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ability. The best performance total score is 24. A low composite DGI score indicates greater impairment in gait.
Functional mobility
Functional mobility was evaluated with Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). TUG is a test of the time required for an individual to stand up from a chair with armrests, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The stopwatch timing started when the participant's bottom left the chair and ended when the bottom made contact with the chair after the walk.
Fear of falling
Fear of falling was evaluated with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). FES-I was used to assess the level of concern about falls during 16 activities of daily living, ranging from basic to more demanding activities including social activities that may contribute to quality of life. It was administered as a self-report questionnaire.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having a cognitive level between 18-23 points according to the Mini Mental Status Examination.
* Must be able to walk independently with and/or without assistive device.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a cognitive level below 18 points according to the Mini Mental Status Examination.
40 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Taskin Ozkan, Doctorate
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Giresun University Vocational School of Health Services Therapy and Rehabilitation Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Giresun University
Giresun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022/30/09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.