Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale for the Community-dwelling Older Adults
NCT ID: NCT04087551
Last Updated: 2020-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-11
2020-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of a New Scale of Balance Recovery Confidence for Community-dwelling Older Adults
NCT04577365
Falls Prevention Evaluation and Development for Older Adults in the Community
NCT04788251
Community-based Falls Prevention Program for the Elderly
NCT01713543
Study on the Steps to Avoid Falls in the Elderly
NCT05207215
Study of the Relationship Between the Strength of Ankle Movement Muscles and Postural Parameters in Elderly Fallers: Towards New Strategies for Screening and Management
NCT03343769
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The first phase will recruit 30 older adults from ages of 65 and older living in the community. A study administrator will contact the participants daily over a 21-day period to obtain frequency and type of event experienced e.g. no fall, fall, near fall (hand), near-fall (leg) or near-fall (other). No other details of the event will be ascertained because this preliminary study will be to determine the incidence of near-falls in a sample of community-dwelling seniors.
The second phase will be to develop a scale which operationalize balance recovery confidence in community-dwelling older adults. In the first stage of the study, twelve older adults will be recruited to develop a comprehensive list of relevant items for the scale. Purposive sampling will be used to invite participants from the earlier study. This approach will ensure sample representativeness of the population and to include participants who have had demonstrated an understanding of near-falls and balance recovery maneuvres in the previous study to develop the scale. An exhaustive list of scale items will be generated from two focus group formed by six participants using a nominal group technique. This consensus-based technique ensures that all items in the scale are relevant and comprehensible to the community-dwelling older adults to discriminate the confidence level in one's ability to perform balance recovery maneuvres. The scale will then be sent to a panel of 50 experts including healthcare professionals as well as a new group of community-dwelling older adults to determine the appropriateness of items ensuring that the scale is relevant, comprehensive and comprehensible. Delphi technique will be adopted as the method to obtain a consensus among experts to finalize the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
Phase 2 The development of the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy scale will be guided using the COSMIN methodology. This development is based on inputs from the community-dwelling older adults to ensure relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The scale would then be validated with a group of healthcare professionals and another new group of community-dwelling older adults using the Delphi method.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Developing the list of items for BRFES
Two groups of six community-dwelling older adults will participate in a focus group session. Each focus group session will begin with a trained facilitator using a session guide welcoming the participants and introducing the participants in the group. The session will adopt a nominal group method which includes silent generation of ideas, sharing of an idea in a 'round robin' fashion, group discussion to clarify ideas and then completing the session with anonymous voting to include items into a list of items to be included in the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES).
Developing the list of items for BRFES
The finalized list of items will be discussed by two researchers who will combine similar items generated by the two focus groups to complete the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale. The list of items has been developed by a group of community-dwelling older adults who had demonstrated an understanding of near-falls and will be able to articulate the use of balance recovery strategies used in near-fall experiences.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Developing the list of items for BRFES
The finalized list of items will be discussed by two researchers who will combine similar items generated by the two focus groups to complete the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale. The list of items has been developed by a group of community-dwelling older adults who had demonstrated an understanding of near-falls and will be able to articulate the use of balance recovery strategies used in near-fall experiences.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to read, write and communicate in English
* History of at least one near-fall or one fall within the last 12 months
* Living independently in the community with or without the use of a walking aid
* Not having any cognitive dysfunction by achieving a score of 7 or less in the 6-item cognitive impairment test (6CIT)
* Able to walk 6 meters within 12 seconds by performing the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
* Able to catch a 30cm ruler by each hands using the ruler drop test
Exclusion Criteria
* Known active malignant conditions
* Cardiovascular conditions e.g. neurally mediated syncope, cardiac syncope, structural heart diseases e.g. aortic stenosis or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart surgery within 3 months
* Pulmonary conditions e.g. serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or oxygen dependence
* Musculoskeletal conditions e.g. moderate to severe osteoarthritis that could affect balance control and muscle function e.g. self-reported pain or dysfunction of the trunk and extremities, fractures or injuries in the extremities in the last 6 months
* Neurological conditions such as Parkinson's Disease, sequelae of stroke, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or severe Dementia or epilepsy
* Legal blindness, severe visual impairment, severe hearing impairment or legal deafness
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore Institute of Technology
OTHER
Queen Margaret University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shawn Soh
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore Institute of Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore Institute of Technology
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soh SL, Tan CW, Lane J, Yeh TT, Soon B. Near-falls in Singapore community-dwelling older adults: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 12;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00748-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019129
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
REP 0197
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.