Novel Technique Versus Conventional Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Ridge Contour Defects
NCT ID: NCT06435780
Last Updated: 2026-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
NCT05975515
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Microneedling For Papillae Reconstruction In Esthetic Zone
NCT06021301
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap v.s Coronally Advanced Flap With Graft for Gingival Recession
NCT06553677
Comparison of Two Different Types of Platelet Concentrate to Augment Bone Around Immediate Dental Implant
NCT05595772
Pontic Site Development Using Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT03834649
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Augmentation of soft tissue by a novel Denuded interpositional pedicled rolled flap technique (DIPRF)
DIPRF
Denuded interpositional pedicled rolled flap technique
Control group
Will be augmented by the conventional subepithelial connective tissue graft technique.
DIPRF
Denuded interpositional pedicled rolled flap technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DIPRF
Denuded interpositional pedicled rolled flap technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Males and females as confirmed by asking the female patients about whether they are pregnant or not
3. Patient's with Seibert classification class I requiring future rehabilitation of one or more premolar region and sound adjacent teeth.
4. Soft tissue thickness on the palatal tissues more than 6mm at the site of harvesting the graft.
5. Presence of Mandibular posterior teeth opposing the tooth to be replaced for occlusion.
6. Clinically healthy soft tissues with no signs of clinical pathology of the soft tissue.
7. Good oral hygiene.
8. Patient accepts to sign an informed consent.
9. ASA I or ASA II Patient.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Smoker patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day
3. Pregnant females
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Misr International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Abo El Futtouh
Clinical Director of International Implantology Program (IIP)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hebattallah A Mattar
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Misr International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Misr International University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. Modified roll technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(5):415-25.
Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Aug;30(4):335-43.
Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville). 1983 Sep-Oct;4(5):437-53. No abstract available.
Meltzer JA. Edentulous area tissue graft correction of an esthetic defect. A case report. J Periodontol. 1979 Jun;50(6):320-2. doi: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.6.320.
Langer B, Calagna L. The subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Oct;44(4):363-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90090-6.
Kaldahl WB, Tussing GJ, Wentz FM, Walker JA. Achieving an esthetic appearance with a fixed prosthesis by submucosal grafts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982 Apr;104(4):449-52. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0209.
Garber DA, Rosenberg ES. The edentulous ridge in fixed prosthodontics. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville). 1981 Jul-Aug;2(4):212-23. No abstract available.
Abrams L. Augmentation of the deformed residual edentulous ridge for fixed prosthesis. Compend Contin Educ Gen Dent. 1980 May-Jun;1(3):205-13. No abstract available.
Soehren SE, Allen AL, Cutright DE, Seibert JS. Clinical and histologic studies of donor tissues utilized for free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol. 1973 Dec;44(12):727-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.1973.44.12.727. No abstract available.
Akcali A, Schneider D, Unlu F, Bicakci N, Kose T, Hammerle CH. Soft tissue augmentation of ridge defects in the maxillary anterior area using two different methods: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jun;26(6):688-95. doi: 10.1111/clr.12368. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
Mormann W, Schaer F, Firestone AR. The relationship between success of free gingival grafts and transplant thickness. Revascularization and shrinkage--a one year clinical study. J Periodontol. 1981 Feb;52(2):74-80. doi: 10.1902/jop.1981.52.2.74.
Studer SP, Lehner C, Bucher A, Scharer P. Soft tissue correction of a single-tooth pontic space: a comparative quantitative volume assessment. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):402-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70034-5.
Thoma DS, Benic GI, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:146-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x.
Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Gurlek O, Sonmez S, Guneri P, Nizam N. A novel soft tissue thickness measuring method using cone beam computed tomography. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Nov;30(6):516-522. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12428. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Das G, Ahmed AR, Suleman G, Lal A, Rana MH, Ahmed N, Arora S. A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 19;58(9):1312. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091312.
Smeets EC, de Jong KJ, Abraham-Inpijn L. Detecting the medically compromised patient in dentistry by means of the medical risk-related history. A survey of 29,424 dental patients in The Netherlands. Prev Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;27(4):530-5. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0285.
Ammar AH, Ahmed E, ElBarbary A, Ghalwash D, Ezz Elarab A. Clinical Comparison of the Volumetric Changes in Single Pontic Site Development through Connective Tissue Grafting Using Modified Pouch Technique versus Pouch Technique in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 25;2022:1677471. doi: 10.1155/2022/1677471. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FWA #00022887
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.