MWA vs RFA for the Treatment of Moderate-sized Benign Thyroid Nodules

NCT ID: NCT06426563

Last Updated: 2024-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-15

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Thyroid nodule is a common condition that affects up to 60% of the population. There is an estimated 10% lifetime probability of developing a thyroid nodule. Although most thyroid nodules are benign, up to 10-15% can enlarge to cause compressive symptoms including neck pressure and discomfort, dysphagia, dyspnea, and dysphonia. The conventional treatment for these benign but problematic nodules has been thyroidectomy. Although generally a low risk operation, thyroidectomy is associated with some risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, bleeding, infection, and need for thyroid hormone supplementation. Since the early 2000s, ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation has emerged as a potential alternative treatment to surgery for benign thyroid nodules. Of the myriad ablation methods, the most commonly used techniques are radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). \[1-3\] A growing body of evidence shows that RFA is an effective treatment for benign solid thyroid nodules, toxic adenomas, and thyroid cysts resulting in overall volume reduction ranges of 40-80% at 1 year, with durable resolution of compressive and hyperthyroid symptoms. However, RFA is not without its limitations. Radiofrequency waves can be limited by the heat sink effect and tissue char leading to longer procedure times and potentially less optimal outcomes in larger, hypervascular, and/or more cystic nodules.

Microwave ablation (MWA) is another ablative technique that uses electromagnetic energy waves to cause tissue hyperthermia and coagulative necrosis. It generally causes higher ablation temperatures than RFA and is less subject to the heat sink effect, and therefore can facilitate more efficient ablation procedures. Current evidence comparing RFA versus MWA for thyroid ablation was limited and was either retrospective, non-randomized \[4-9\], under-powered, or with an unequal baseline. The results from these studies were also conflicting, suggesting suboptimal quality of evidence and bias due to non-standardized technique of ablation across studies. To date, there is no randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of RFA versus MWA for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. Given the higher ablation temperatures, freedom from heat sink effect, and no influence from impedance changes during ablation, MWA may achieve different treatment efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thyroid Nodule \(Benign\) Ablation Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One group is for radiofrequency ablation treatment (RFA), another group is for microwave ablation treatment (MWA)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiofrequency ablation treatment (RFA) to thyroid nodule

Participants who are undergo thyroid nodule treatment by RFA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ablation treatment of thyroid nodule

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use Radiofrequency or Microwave ablation device to treat thyroid nodule

Microwave ablation treatment (MWA) to thyroid nodule

Participants who are undergo thyroid nodule treatment by MWA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ablation treatment of thyroid nodule

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use Radiofrequency or Microwave ablation device to treat thyroid nodule

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ablation treatment of thyroid nodule

Use Radiofrequency or Microwave ablation device to treat thyroid nodule

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult patients \>/=18 years of age
2. Nodule maximal diameter ≥2cm and nodule volume \<20ml
3. Nodule being predominantly solid (≥80% solid)
4. Confirmed benign nature of nodules, either by : two benign fine needle biopsies, with the most recent biopsy performed within 1 year of enrollment in study or one benign fine needle biopsy and low suspicion characteristics on ultrasound
5. Both functional and non-functional nodules are eligible.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cytologically indeterminate nodules
2. Nodules with substernal extension or posterior extension that cannot be viewed sufficiently with ultrasound
3. current pregnancy or cardiac arrhythmias; presence of pacemaker or any medical condition that renders patient unfit for thermal ablation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Man Him Matrix Fung

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Man Him, Matrix Fung, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+852-22554232

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Man Him, Matrix Fung, MBBS

Role: primary

+852-22554232

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lang BHH, Fung MMH. Safety and Efficacy of Single-Session Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment for Benign Non-toxic Multinodular Goiter. World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1704-1710. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06527-8. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35313358 (View on PubMed)

Cheng Z, Che Y, Yu S, Wang S, Teng D, Xu H, Li J, Sun D, Han Z, Liang P. US-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency versus Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09930-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28842651 (View on PubMed)

Wu W, Gong X, Zhou Q, Chen X, Chen X. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Solid Benign Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of MWA versus Control Group. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9724090. doi: 10.1155/2017/9724090. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29333159 (View on PubMed)

He L, Zhao W, Xia Z, Su A, Li Z, Zhu J. Comparative efficacy of different ultrasound-guided ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0243864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243864. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33471820 (View on PubMed)

Hu K, Wu J, Dong Y, Yan Z, Lu Z, Liu L. Comparison between ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation in benign thyroid nodules. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(7):1535-1540. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_322_19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31939434 (View on PubMed)

Guo DM, Chen Z, Zhai YX, Su HH. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation for benign thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021 Jul;95(1):187-196. doi: 10.1111/cen.14438. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33556187 (View on PubMed)

Jin H, Fan J, Lu L, Cui M. A Propensity Score Matching Study Between Microwave Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in Terms of Safety and Efficacy for Benign Thyroid Nodules Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 9;12:584972. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.584972. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33767666 (View on PubMed)

Kim JH, Baek JH, Lim HK, Ahn HS, Baek SM, Choi YJ, Choi YJ, Chung SR, Ha EJ, Hahn SY, Jung SL, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee CY, Lee JH, Lee KH, Lee YH, Park JS, Park H, Shin JH, Suh CH, Sung JY, Sim JS, Youn I, Choi M, Na DG; Guideline Committee for the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) and Korean Society of Radiology. 2017 Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation Guideline: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):632-655. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.632. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29962870 (View on PubMed)

Huh JY, Baek JH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee JH. Symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation treatment session--prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):909-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111300. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22438360 (View on PubMed)

Lim HK, Lee JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Kim JK, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year follow-up results for 111 patients. Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):1044-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2671-3. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23096937 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW 24-141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.