Differing Completion Rates of DIABETES Education on Patient Reported Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT06419907
Last Updated: 2025-09-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-16
2025-05-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. What is the impact of differing completion rates of DSME programmes on ability to self-care (primary outcome), diabetes distress and health related quality of life in type 2 diabetes.
Researchers will compare participants across four study groups (Group 1 will receive a full DSME programme, Group 2 will receive 60%, Group 3 will receive 10% and Group 4 will have delayed education) to see if patients who attend minimal aspects (10%) of diabetes self-management education programmes gain clinically significant improvements in ability to self-care compared to those who do not attend and if the nationally accepted 60 % completion rate is as effective as 100% completion.
Participants will:
* complete three validated patient reported outcome measures testing self care activities, diabetes distress and health related quality of life.
* Attend structured diabetes self-management education of differing completion rates dependent on the group they have been allocated to.
* repeat the same three patient reported outcome measures 2-4 months after intervention. For participants in group 4 this will be 3-4 months from baseline.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Self-management Education Based on Theory of Planned Behavior on Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02594748
Empowerment Training on Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Empowerment Levels and Clinical Findings
NCT05680207
The Effectiveness of Diabetes Patient Education and Self-Management Education in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00906919
Evaluation of a Self-management Oriented Diabetes Education Program for Intensified Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00901992
The Effect of a Coordinated Inpatient Diabetes Education Program in the Outpatient Setting
NCT00657800
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This feasibility study will test the impact of differing completion rates of a face-to-face DSME programme on patient reported outcomes measuring self-care, diabetes distress and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes.
Using a quantitative approach, a single centre, randomised feasibility study will be conducted, aiming to recruit 120 eligible people with type 2 diabetes due to attend a secondary care diabetes clinic in the Northwest UK for specialist support, education and advice. Participants will be randomised into one of four groups: Group 1 will receive a full DSME programme, Group 2 will receive 60%, Group 3 will receive 10% and Group 4 will have delayed education. Normal clinical care will continue. Preliminary outcomes (psychometric questionnaire scores measuring ability to self-care, diabetes distress and health related quality of life) will be evaluated at baseline and 3-4 months post-intervention. Measures of feasibility (eligibility, recruitment and retention rates) will be reported.
Whilst the current literature evidences the clear benefits for people with type 2 diabetes attending DSME programmes, there is minimal understanding of the benefits of partial DSME completion on a person's ability to self-care despite national consensus accepting 60% attendance as 'completed'. The proposed research aims to test the feasibility of conducting a full randomised control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of DSME programmes on psychometric outcomes with differing completion rates
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
100% of a face to face 6 hour structured diabetes self management education session
Type 2 Live Well (structured diabetes self management education programme)
Structured diabetes self management education programme designed to support those with type 2 diabetes self care and prevent long term associated complications.
Group 2
60% of a face to face 6 hour structured diabetes self management education session. Total attendance will be 3 hours 36 minutes.
Type 2 Live Well (structured diabetes self management education programme)
Structured diabetes self management education programme designed to support those with type 2 diabetes self care and prevent long term associated complications.
Group 3
10% of a face to face 6 hour structured diabetes self management education session. Total attendance will be 36 minutes.
Type 2 Live Well (structured diabetes self management education programme)
Structured diabetes self management education programme designed to support those with type 2 diabetes self care and prevent long term associated complications.
Group 4
Will not attend a face to face 6 hour structured diabetes self management education session
Type 2 Live Well (structured diabetes self management education programme)
Structured diabetes self management education programme designed to support those with type 2 diabetes self care and prevent long term associated complications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Type 2 Live Well (structured diabetes self management education programme)
Structured diabetes self management education programme designed to support those with type 2 diabetes self care and prevent long term associated complications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack capacity to make an informed decision.
* A diagnosis of type 1, type 3c, Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) or gestational diabetes.
* Received structured education for their diabetes within the last 12 months either online or face to face.
* Require 1:1 education support e.g., requires interpreter.
* Patients unable to attend for structured classroom education e.g., housebound.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
University of Liverpool
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gemma A Lewis
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Liverpool
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Diabetes Centre, St Helens Hospital
St Helens, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lewis G, Irving G, Wilding J, Hardy K. Evaluating the impact of differing completion rates of a face-to-face DIABETES self-management education programme on Patient Reported Outcome measures (DIABETES PRO): A feasibility trial protocol. Diabet Med. 2024 Dec;41(12):e15430. doi: 10.1111/dme.15430. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Secure online environment for University of Liverpool Researchers to deposit, share and promote data and information
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
337691
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UoL001848
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.