Clinical Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Support in Early Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Related Cardiogenic Shock

NCT ID: NCT06414187

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2027-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to appraise the impact of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in the treatment of early stages of cardiogenic shock, irrespective of etiology. Findings of this randomized trial may enhance clinical decision making regarding the use of MCS in specific subsets of patients in early stages of cardiogenic shock.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* What are the effects of IABP on a composite of clinical endpoints representing clinical deterioration at 30-days in patients presenting with SCAI stage B or C cardiogenic shock?
* What is the 1-year clinical outcome (including mortality and hospital admissions for cardiovascular causes) of patients treated with vs. without IABP for early cardiogenic shock?
* Is there a difference in efficacy of IABP within the treatment of early cardiogenic shock related to Acute Coronary Syndrome versus non-ischemic causes?
* Is there a difference in efficacy of IABP within the treatment of SCAI stage B versus stage C cardiogenic shock?

Participants will be 1:1 randomized to IABP support or standard of care (a treatment strategy including inotropes and/or vasopressors but no IABP insertion). Patients will be stratified for Acute Coronary Syndrome/non-ischemic etiology and stage B/stage C cardiogenic shock, following stratification to center. Researchers will compare the group who was randomized to IABP to the control group (i.e. standard of care) to see if there is a difference in the primary trial endpoint after 30-days, including 1) all-cause mortality, 2) escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation, 3) escalation of mechanical circulatory support strategy, 4) acute kidney injury and 5) stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: The scientific underpinning for the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in early cardiogenic shock, especially for the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), is scarce and insufficiently clarified for different etiologies of cardiogenic shock. Previous randomized trials limited the inclusion criteria to patients with ischemic cardiogenic shock while observational research suggested favorable effects of timely adoption of IABP in patients with deteriorating myocardial function through ischemic or non-ischemic causes. Early stage of cardiogenic shock is defined by relative hypotension without hypoperfusion, or hypoperfusion still responsive to therapy (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, SCAI, stage B and C, respectively). A tightening of global guidelines with respect to the clinical adoption of IABP overshadowed the potential beneficial effects for specific patient categories within the total spectrum of cardiogenic shock. Patients currently presenting with early stages of cardiogenic shock caused by ischemic or non-ischemic etiology are hypothetically undertreated due to an assumed lack of clinical benefit of IABP in general. The aim of this randomized trial is to appraise the impact of IABP in the treatment of early stages of cardiogenic shock, irrespective of etiology. Findings of this randomized trial may enhance clinical decision making regarding the use of MCS in specific subsets of patients in early stages of cardiogenic shock.

Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the 30-day clinical impact of IABP within the treatment of early (SCAI stage B or C) cardiogenic shock. Secondary objectives are

1\) To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcome (including mortality and hospital admissions for cardiovascular causes) of patients treated with IABP for early cardiogenic shock; 2) To identify differences in efficacy of IABP in the treatment of early cardiogenic shock related to Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) versus non-ischemic causes; 3) To explore differences in efficacy of IABP in the treatment of stage B versus stage C cardiogenic shock.

Trial design: Open-label, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial.

Trial population: The trial population consists of patients in early cardiogenic shock, defined as SCAI stage B or C, either related or unrelated to ACS.

Intervention: Patients enrolled in this trial will be 1:1 randomized to IABP support or standard of care (i.e. inotropes and/or vasopressors but no IABP insertion). Patients will be stratified for ACS/non-ischemic etiology and stage B/stage C cardiogenic shock following stratification according to center.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiogenic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients enrolled in this trial will be 1:1 randomized to IABP support or standard of care (i.e. inotropes and/or vasopressors, but no IABP insertion). Patients will be stratified for ACS/non-ischemic etiology and stage B/stage C cardiogenic shock following stratification according to center.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Given the nature of percutaneous IABP support a double-blind trial design is not feasible. Therefore, this trial is an open-label randomized clinical trial indicating both the patient, treating physicians as well as researchers are aware of the allocated treatment (i.e. with or without IABP). The Clinical Event Committee (CEC), responsible for adjudicating events belonging to e.g. the primary outcome, are blinded for the allocated treatment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IABP-arm

Patients assigned IABP therapy will undergo IABP insertion as promptly as possible, with a target interval from randomization to insertion of less than 30 minutes. Implantation of the IABP balloon can be established either in the cardiac catheterization laboratory or at bedside in the ICU or cardiac care unit. The steering committee of this trial recommends the use of an appropriate-sized IABP balloon according to the instructions for use.

Low-dose vasopressors (noradrenaline/norepinephrine up to 0.2 ug/kg/min) are allowed next to IABP support. The necessity of increasing the noradrenaline/norepinephrine dose with at least 0.2 ug/kg/min or the necessity to initiate de-novo inotropic agents to reach a mean arterial blood pressure of at least 65 mmHg is considered treatment escalation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients who are randomized to the IABP-arm will be supported with IABP according to local, clinical guidelines (including algorithms for anticoagulation, verification of correct positioning and weaning strategies). The IABP console and disposables should be used according to the instructions for use, including the use of an appropriate-sized IABP balloon alligned with patient length and height.

Standard of care-arm

When a patient is randomized to the standard of care-arm, the definitive treatment strategy is up to the discretion of the treating physician (providing no IABP is inserted). The treatment strategy may include fluid management as well as administration of inotropes and vasopressors. The only imposed difference in treatment is the omission of IABP, as the dose of inotropes and vasopressors is not expected to be high in early cardiogenic shock.

The final decision to escalate in the strategy of mechanical circulatory support (including to initiate IABP in the standard of care-arm) is up to the discretion of the treating physician. However, the steering committee feels escalation in MCS strategy is appropriate in case of persistent mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg with incessant lactate levels \>5.0 mmol/L when pharmacologic support was already intensified (e.g. the noradrenaline/norepinephrine dose exceeds 0.2 ug/kg/min or inotropic support was already administered).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Patients who are randomized to the IABP-arm will be supported with IABP according to local, clinical guidelines (including algorithms for anticoagulation, verification of correct positioning and weaning strategies). The IABP console and disposables should be used according to the instructions for use, including the use of an appropriate-sized IABP balloon alligned with patient length and height.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 18 years of age;
* Stage B cardiogenic shock (presence of hypotension or tachycardia with signs of venous congestion, in absence of tissue hypoperfusion) OR
* Stage C cardiogenic shock (evidence of tissue hypoperfusion requiring any intervention beyond fluid management, still responsive to therapy) AND
* Must include at least one of the following: 1) lactate levels at least 2.0 mmol/L; 2) creatinine doubling OR \>50 percent decline in glomerular filtration rate compared to baseline; 3) laboratory markers indicating liver injury (e.g. high serum transaminase levels) or 4) elevated NT-pro BNP.

A patient is eligible for trial inclusion if, at the time of randomization, no more than 1 inotropic agent has been administered AND when the maximum dose of noradrenaline/norepinephrine has not exceeded 0.2 ug/kg/min in the context of mean arterial pressure \>65 mmHg.

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient is in cardiogenic shock but does not fulfill the definition for stage B or C;
* Administration of at least 2 inotropic or vasopressive agents at study randomization;
* Administration of noradrenaline/norepinephrine exceeding 0.2 ug/kg/min at study randomization;
* Suspected or known mechanical complication contributing to cardiogenic shock, e.g. ventricular septal defect or papillary muscle rupture;
* Cardiogenic shock developing within 72 hours of a surgical procedure (i.e. low cardiac output with an inability to wean cardiopulmonary bypass);
* Inability to provide informed consent. Of not: patients admitted in cardiogenic shock who required cardiopulmonary resuscitation earlier, but are conscious at the time of hospital admission, are eligible for study participation;
* Known or suspected insufficiency of the aortic valve with at least moderate aortic regurgitation;
* Known or suspected peripheral arterial disease preventing safe insertion of IABP;
* Known or suspected thoracic or abdominal aortic disease (including aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm) precluding safe insertion of IABP;
* Suspicion of sepsis or septic shock (including septic cardiomyopathy);
* Pregnancy;
* Predicted life expectancy \<6 months because of concomitant disease;
* Concurrent participation in a clinical trial with competing endpoints.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Arrow International LCC (Subsidiary of Teleflex Inc.)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolas van Mieghem

Chair, Full Professional, Clinical Director of Interventional Cardiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Prof MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasmus University Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Antoon JM van den Enden, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31 10 7038896

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Antoon JM van den Enden

Role: primary

+31 70 308896

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IABP ON-TIME

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug-eluting Balloon in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT00856765 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3