Assessment of ECMO in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock
NCT ID: NCT04184635
Last Updated: 2025-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-14
2027-10-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An important benefit for the patients randomized to the ECMO arm is expected and the risk-to-benefit ratio is expected to be in favor of the experimental treatment arm.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Revascularization Strategy of Multivessel Disease for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator
NCT05527717
Comparison of Standard Treatment Versus Standard Treatment Plus Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) in Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock
NCT00314847
Efficacy Study of LV Assist Device to Treat Patients With Cardiogenic Shock (ISAR-SHOCK)
NCT00417378
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Hemodynamic OutComes: Role of Non-Invasive Cardiac System (SHOCk-NICaS) Study
NCT04586764
Can Escalation Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock
NCT05800951
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used more and more frequently in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and refractory cardiogenic shock despite the absence of high level scientific evidence to recommend the use of temporary circulatory support devices (TCS) in this setting.TCS support may also benefit to cardiogenic shock patients not initially refractory to conventional medical management since their mortality exceeds 40% and most of deaths are due to the development of refractory cardiogenic shock and multiple organ failure.
The ANCHOR trial is therefore designed to test the hypothesis that VA-ECMO support associated with IABP results in improved outcomes in comparison with optimal medical treatment alone in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. An ethical rescue option to VA-ECMO will however be provided to control patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional medical treatment since recent data suggested survival up-to 50% with ECMO support in this setting.
Main objective - To determine if early VA-ECMO combined with IABP support and optimal medical treatment would improve the outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock as compared with optimal medical treatment alone.
Scope of the study
\- Patients satisfying all of the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria will be classified as 'Eligible'. Consent to research will be obtained from a close relative or surrogate for all eligible patients prior to randomization.
Should such a person be absent, eligible patients will be randomized according to the specifications of emergency consent and the patient will be asked to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.
Randomization will be possible in centers with robust experience in the management of AMI and cardiogenic shock but no on-site ECMO capability providing that an ECMO retrieval team from the nearest ECMO center can establish ECMO no later than 2 hours after randomization.
Before randomization, physicians at the non-ECMO center will check that the ECMO team is immediately available and that an ICU/CCU bed is available at the ECMO center. Thereafter, if the patient is randomized to the ECMO arm, the mobile ECMO retrieval team will travel to the center, initiate VA-ECMO and will rapidly transfer the patient on VA-ECMO to the ECMO center.
Description of experimental ECMO + IABP Arm
* Protocolized conventional management of cardiogenic shock
* VA-ECMO will be started as soon as possible
* For patients randomized at non-ECMO centers, a mobile ECMO team will initiate ECMO at the non-ECMO center and transport the patient to the ECMO center immediately
* IABP inserted in the contralateral femoral artery (unless technically not possible)
* ECMO management according to protocol
* ECMO weaning according to protocol
Description of conventional treatment Arm
* Protocolized conventional management of cardiogenic shock
* IABP not recommended. No other TCS device (e.g., ECMO, Impella, Thoratec PHP, TandemHeart) permitted
* Rescue VA-ECMO only if one of 1 or 2 or 3 applies:
* 1\. Refractory cardiogenic shock defined as
1. Cardiac index \<1.2 l/min/m² or VTI \<6 cm AND
2. Assessment and correction of hypovolemia AND
3. (dobutamine ≥15 microg/kg/min + norepinephrine ≥1.5 microg/kg/min) OR epinephrine ≥ 0.75 microg/kg/min
4. Serum lactate \>5 mmol/L or serum lactate increased \>50% in the last 6 hours
* 2\. Uncontrolled lethal arrhythmia despite K \>4.5 mmol/l AND Mg \>1.0 mmol/l AND Intubation and mechanical ventilation with deep sedation AND IV Loading of amiodarone AND IV xylocaine
* 3\. Refractory cardiac arrest
Mandatory validation of rescue VA-ECMO by an independent adjudicator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental ECMO + IABP Arm
VA-ECMO will be instituted percutaneously under echo guidance via the femoral route as soon as possible.
An IABP will be systematically inserted in the contralateral femoral artery (unless technically not possible).
VA-ECMO
* The ECMO device will be the CardioHelp (MAQUET, GETINGE, Orléans, France) using the veno-arterial setting and percutaneous femoro-femoral cannulation with MAQUET GETINGE HLS cannulae.
* Intraortic balloon pump will be MEGA 50 cc or 40cc, (MAQUET, GETINGE, Orléans, France).
Control Conventional Treatment Arm
Standard management of cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction according to the current ESC guidelines. It is not recommended to use IABP support and no other TCS device (e.g., ECMO, Impella, Thoratec PHP, TandemHeart) will be permitted in the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VA-ECMO
* The ECMO device will be the CardioHelp (MAQUET, GETINGE, Orléans, France) using the veno-arterial setting and percutaneous femoro-femoral cannulation with MAQUET GETINGE HLS cannulae.
* Intraortic balloon pump will be MEGA 50 cc or 40cc, (MAQUET, GETINGE, Orléans, France).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Revascularization by PCI for acute myocardial infarction has been performed or is planned in the following 60 minutes
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg for \>30 min or catecholamine support required to maintain systolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg
* Signs of pulmonary congestion
* Signs of impaired organ perfusion with at least one of the following:
Altered mental status OR cold, clammy skin and extremities OR oliguria with urine output \<30 ml/h OR serum lactate \>2.0 mmol/l
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Onset of shock \>24 Hours
* Shock of other cause (hypovolemic, anaphylactic or vagal shock)
* Shock due to massive pulmonary embolism
* Resuscitation \>30 minutes
* No intrinsic heart activity
* Patient moribund on the day of randomization or SAPS II \>90
* Surgical revascularization for AMI (CABG) planned or already performed prior to randomization
* Cerebral deficit with fixed dilated pupils or Irreversible neurological pathology
* Mechanical infarction complication (massive mitral regurgitation, pericardium drainage required, septal ventricular defect)
* Severe peripheral artery disease or previous aortic or ilio-femoral surgery precluding ECMO and IABP insertion
* Aortic regurgitation \> II
* Other severe concomitant disease with limited life expectancy \< 1 year
* Proven heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
* ECMO device not immediately available
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alain COMBES, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Meyer-Saraei R, Nordbeck P, Geisler T, Landmesser U, Skurk C, Fach A, Lapp H, Piek JJ, Noc M, Goslar T, Felix SB, Maier LS, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Barthelemy O, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Torremante P, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Zeymer U; CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2419-2432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710261. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, de Waha-Thiele S, Meyer-Saraei R, Fuernau G, Eitel I, Nordbeck P, Geisler T, Landmesser U, Skurk C, Fach A, Jobs A, Lapp H, Piek JJ, Noc M, Goslar T, Felix SB, Maier LS, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Barthelemy O, Huber K, Windecker S, Hunziker L, Savonitto S, Torremante P, Vrints C, Schneider S, Zeymer U, Desch S; CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 1;379(18):1699-1710. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808788. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
Overtchouk P, Pascal J, Lebreton G, Hulot JS, Luyt CE, Combes A, Kerneis M, Silvain J, Barthelemy O, Leprince P, Brechot N, Montalescot G, Collet JP. Outcome after revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock on extracorporeal life support. EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2160-e2168. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014.
Muller G, Flecher E, Lebreton G, Luyt CE, Trouillet JL, Brechot N, Schmidt M, Mastroianni C, Chastre J, Leprince P, Anselmi A, Combes A. The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):370-378. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4223-9. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N°ID-RCB : 2019-A00275-52
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P140936
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.