Drug-Eluting Balloon Treatment vs. Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Lipid-Rich Plaques
NCT ID: NCT07107971
Last Updated: 2026-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-04
2033-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
* Does the drug-coated balloon reduce the amount of fat inside the plaque more than medication alone?
* Is this treatment safe for patients?
Participants will:
* Undergo imaging of their coronary arteries during their planned heart procedure (PCI)
* Be randomly assigned to receive either a drug-coated balloon treatment or no extra treatment
* Undergo a heart scan (CT scan of the coronary arteries) within 2 weeks and again around 9 months after the procedure.
* Undergo a second heart catherization 9 months later to examine changes in the plaque.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT02219802
PAclitaxel-eluting Balloon in Primary PCI in Amsterdam; Pilot Study
NCT01274728
Drug-eluting Balloon in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT00856765
Registry of Coronary Disease Outcomes Revascularizing With Drug-Coated Balloons
NCT07231835
Coronary Artery Endothelial Dysfunction With Drug Coated Balloons
NCT04901767
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are often caused by rupture or erosion of certain high-risk vulnerable plaques. These plaques demonstrate specific features, such as a large lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin fibrous cap, and inflammation. Half of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation ACS have an additional vulnerable plaque, which increases their risk for non-culprit events during follow-up. Coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with the addition of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) enables the identification of coronary lesions with high lipid content, quantified using the lipid-core burden index (LCBI) and is therefore able to distinguish plaques at risk to cause future non-culprit events. In addition, computed tomography coronary angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive imaging modality that can identify high-risk plaque characteristics such as positive remodeling, low attentuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification. Incorporating CCTA into this trial offers a unique opportunity to explore the potential of AI-based quantitative CT (AI-QCT) paramters by comparing them to IVUS-NIRS findings and clinical outcomes, which may support the future role of CCTA as a non-invasive tool for identifying and monitoring vulnerable plaques.
The main question remains whether local and systemic treatment of such high-risk plaques decreases the risk for adverse clinical outcome.
In our previous pilot study, DEBuT-LRP, we demonstrated that it was safe and feasible to treat vulnerable lipid-rich plaques with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) and that it was able to reduce the maximum LCBI on a 4 mm segment (maxLCBI4mm) after 9 months. In this randomized controlled trial, we intend to investigate the impact of DCB treatment on the maxLCBI4mm of lipid-rich plaques when compared to guideline-directed medical therapy alone.
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment of non-obstructive non-culprit vulnerable lipid-rich plaques (LRP) leads to a greater reduction of the lipid-core burden index than guideline-directed medical therapy alone.
Study design:
A prospective two-arm randomized controlled trial.
Study population:
Patients older than 18 years with ACS who are scheduled for invasive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a native coronary artery.
Intervention:
DCB treatment of LRP in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).
Main study parameters:
The main study endpoint is the difference in maxLCBI4mm reduction from baseline to 9 months follow-up compared between the two randomization groups.
Secondary study endpoints are clinical safety endpoints (1. Flow-limiting dissection related to DCB-treatment necessitating bail-out stenting; 2. Periprocedural myocardial infarction; 3. Bleeding; 4. LRP lesion failure: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization related to the index LRP, 5. Patient-oriented outcome: all-cause death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization) and imaging endpoints (1. IVUS-derived parameters; 2. QCA endpoints; 3. NIRS analyses of non-treated vessels; 4. CCTA-derived parameters).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Drug-coated balloon treatment of non-culprit lipid-rich plaque on top of guideline-directed medical therapy
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Participants in the intervention group will receive local treatment of non-obstructive, lipid-rich coronary plaques using a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DCB) in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The DCB will be applied to plaques identified as high-risk based on near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) imaging, defined by a maxLCBI4mm ≥325. The balloon catheter diameter will be sized 1:1 according to the true lumen diameter as derived from IVUS. Balloon length will be sized to the LRP length as measured with IVUS including a 5 mm margin on each side. The balloon will be inflated at nominal pressure (6-8 ATM) during a period of at least 60 seconds, but preferably for 90 seconds if tolerated. A 5 mm margin is taken into account to differentiate between single or multiple LRPs within the same coronary artery.
Control group
Guideline-directed medical therapy alone
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Participants in the intervention group will receive local treatment of non-obstructive, lipid-rich coronary plaques using a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DCB) in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The DCB will be applied to plaques identified as high-risk based on near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) imaging, defined by a maxLCBI4mm ≥325. The balloon catheter diameter will be sized 1:1 according to the true lumen diameter as derived from IVUS. Balloon length will be sized to the LRP length as measured with IVUS including a 5 mm margin on each side. The balloon will be inflated at nominal pressure (6-8 ATM) during a period of at least 60 seconds, but preferably for 90 seconds if tolerated. A 5 mm margin is taken into account to differentiate between single or multiple LRPs within the same coronary artery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Successful PCI of a native coronary artery or major side branch;
* At least 2 native coronary arteries are accessible for invasive coronary imaging; i.e. not totally occluded and \>2 mm and \<6 mm reference vessel diameter.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel;
* Procedural complications of the index PCI;
* Known renal insufficiency, i.e. eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2;
* Hypersensitivity or allergy to contrast with inability to administer steroid and antihistamine premedication;
* Presence of a comorbid condition with a life expectancy of less than one year;
* Body weight \>250 kg;
* Subject belonging to a vulnerable population (per investigator's judgment, e.g., subordinate hospital staff) or is unable to read or write.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bimmer Claessen
Interventional Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bimmer E.P.M. Claessen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam UMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL-009200
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.