A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Sonelokimab Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

NCT ID: NCT06411899

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

422 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sonelokimab administered subcutaneously compared with placebo in the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to either sonelokimab or matching placebo up to Week 16.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sonelokimab

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive sonelokimab 120 mg Q2W from Weeks 0 to 6 then 120 mg Q4W starting at Week 8 up to Week 48.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sonelokimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Sonelokimab

Placebo

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo Q2W from Weeks 0 to 6 then Q4W starting at Week 8 up to Week 16. They will receive sonelokimab 120 mg Q2W for 4 doses from Weeks 16 to 22 then Q4W from Week 24 up to Week 48

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sonelokimab

Sonelokimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participants must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
2. Participants who are diagnosed with hidradenitis suppurativa as determined by the investigator and have a history of signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa for at least 6 months before signing the informed consent.
3. Participants who have had an inadequate response to appropriate systemic antibiotics for treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to, systemic antibiotics for treatment of their HS), in the investigator's opinion.
4. Participants who have a total AN count of ≥5.
5. Participants who have HS lesions present in ≥2 distinct anatomical areas, at least one of which must contain single or multiple fistulas (ie, be Hurley Stage II or III).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participants with a known hypersensitivity to sonelokimab or any of its excipients.
2. Participants with any other active skin disease or condition that may, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the assessment of HS.
3. Participants with underlying conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, potentially places the participant at unacceptable risk.
4. Participants with current severe or uncontrolled disease(s) that put(s) the participant at increased risk in the investigator's opinion, would preclude the participant from adhering to the protocol or completing the study per protocol.
5. Participants with any other known autoimmune disease or any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with an accurate assessment of clinical symptoms of HS.
6. Participants with a gastrointestinal condition including inflammatory bowel disease or diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Prof Kristian Reich, M.D., Ph.D. (equ.)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Margate, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

West Dundee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Columbus, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Warren, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Boardman, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Frisco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Forest, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Mill Creek, Washington, United States

Site Status

Clinical SIte

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Markham, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Buxtehude, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical SIte

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Langenau, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Mahlow, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Wuppertal, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Site

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Chieti, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Cona, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Torrette, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Site

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Ossy, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sosnowiec, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Clinical Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Clinical Site

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dudley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Site

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Site

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bulgaria Canada Germany Hungary Italy Norway Poland Portugal United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VELA-1

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

M1095-HS-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.