Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Sonelokimab Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

NCT ID: NCT06411379

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

418 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-14

Study Completion Date

2026-06-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sonelokimab administered subcutaneously compared with placebo in the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to either sonelokimab or matching placebo up to Week 16.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sonelokimab

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive sonelokimab 120 mg Q2W from Weeks 0 to 6 then 120 mg Q4W starting at Week 8 up to Week 48.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sonelokimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Sonelokimab

Placebo

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo Q2W from Weeks 0 to 6 then Q4W starting at Week 8 up to Week 16. They will receive sonelokimab 120 mg Q2W for 4 doses from Weeks 16 to 22 then Q4W from Week 24 up to Week 48

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sonelokimab

Sonelokimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participants must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
2. Participants who are diagnosed with hidradenitis suppurativa as determined by the investigator and have a history of signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa for at least 6 months before signing the informed consent.
3. Participants who have had an inadequate response to appropriate systemic antibiotics for treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to, systemic antibiotics for treatment of their HS), in the investigator's opinion.
4. Participants who have a total AN count of ≥5.
5. Participants who have HS lesions present in ≥2 distinct anatomical areas, at least one of which must contain single or multiple fistulas (ie, be Hurley Stage II or III).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participants with a known hypersensitivity to sonelokimab or any of its excipients.
2. Participants with any other active skin disease or condition that may, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the assessment of HS.
3. Participants with underlying conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, potentially places the participant at unacceptable risk.
4. Participants with current severe or uncontrolled disease(s) that put(s) the participant at increased risk in the investigator's opinion, would preclude the participant from adhering to the protocol or completing the study per protocol.
5. Participants with any other known autoimmune disease or any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with an accurate assessment of clinical symptoms of HS.
6. Participants with a gastrointestinal condition including inflammatory bowel disease or diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Prof Kristian Reich, M.D., Ph.D. (equ.)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Murray, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Canton, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Clarkston, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Waterford, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

New Brighton, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Clinical Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Site

Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Clinical Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Clinical Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Clinical Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Clinical Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Clinical Site

Antony, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Clinical SIte

Brest, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Saint-Mandé, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinical Site

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bad Bentheim, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Bramsche, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Darmstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Gera, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Clinical Site

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Kielce, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Site

Trnava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Clinical Site

Alcorcón, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Granollers, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Manises, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany Ireland Netherlands Poland Slovakia Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VELA-2

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

M1095-HS-302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Etanercept in Hidradenitis Suppurativa
NCT00329823 COMPLETED PHASE2