A Novel Suturing Technique of Cystocele Treatment

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The rug weaving-like plication technique may offer a viable alternative for cystocele repair without mesh, utilizing natural tissue.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of Suturing Technique Types on Pubocervical Fascia at Colpographhy Anterior for Cystocele Repair

NCT05444023

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

COMPLETED NA

Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy

NCT05449054

Cystocele Cystocele, Midline Vaginal Prolapse +2 more

UNKNOWN NA

Uterine Closure for Cesarean Section: a Novel Technique

NCT05669300

Cesarean Section Complications Cesarean Section; Dehiscence

COMPLETED

Surgical Approach for Pilonidal Disease

NCT04334681

Pilonidal Disease

COMPLETED

UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation

NCT05517018

Uterus; Scar

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent cystocele repair using the rug weaving plication technique, a natural tissue repair method implemented since 2022 for anterior prolapse, with those treated using conventional techniques.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug weaving-like plication technique and 32 patients who underwent surgery using conventional colporrhaphy. The investigators recorded demographic data and operative details of the patients. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up,the investigators assessed patients' complaints, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), Modified Oxford Scoring (MOS), and pelvic floor muscle strength. The investigators measured bladder wall thickness between the bladder and anterior vaginal wall using Transvaginal Ultrasonography (USG) and compared demographic data, operative details, and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cystocele

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

33 patients operated with rug wave

Group1

rug weaving-like plication technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug weaving-like plication technique in cystosel

32 patients who underwent surgery using conventional colporrhaphy.

Group 2

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rug weaving-like plication technique

anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug weaving-like plication technique in cystosel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Patients operated on using the rug weaving plication technique

Exclusion Criteria:Patients operated on using the conventional anterior colporrhaphy

Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No