Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
1500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-30
2028-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The contribution of the time-lapse system allows an evaluation of the embryos not only by their morphology, but also by their cell division kinetics, both being direct markers of cell mechanics. Together, these morpho-kinetic data finally allow for the best identification of embryos with greater implantation potential. Time-lapse imaging represents a further step towards an objective assessment of the embryo, but inter- and intra-embryologist variations in annotations partly compromise this objectivity. In addition, many decision algorithms based on the evaluation of morpho-kinetic parameters have been developed, but the lack of reproducibility from one Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) center to another is a hindrance to the generalization of any particular algorithm. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine morpho-kinetic factors predictive of implantation using machine learning and to link these factors to human embryo mechanistic properties.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Selection of Embryos by Time-lapse
NCT01138631
Clinical Validation of Embryo Cinematography
NCT01549262
Study of the Cleavage of the Egg in Relation to the Stimulation Treatment
NCT01674894
Can Time-lapse Parameters be Used to Predict Pregnancy of Human Embryos?
NCT03445923
Improvement of in Vitro Fertilization Implantation by Soluble CD146 Dose in Embryonic Culture Environment
NCT03785119
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The contribution of the time-lapse system allows an evaluation of the embryos not only by their morphology, but also by their cell division kinetics, both being direct markers of cell mechanics. Together, these morpho-kinetic data finally allow for the best identification of embryos with greater implantation potential. Time-lapse imaging represents a further step towards an objective assessment of the embryo, but inter- and intra-embryologist variations in annotations partly compromise this objectivity. In addition, many decision algorithms based on the evaluation of morpho-kinetic parameters have been developed, but the lack of reproducibility from one Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) center to another is a hindrance to the generalization of any particular algorithm.
Machine learning is one of the main methods of data analysis that could define algorithms that are unbiased, more robust and applicable to all centers. But the optimal algorithm is not yet defined. Recently, an artificial intelligence approach applied to a large collection of time-lapse embryo images was developed to determine the embryo with the highest grade of evolution, with an AUC\> 0.98. Using clinical data, the authors created a decision tree to integrate embryo quality and female age and identify the chances of pregnancy. However, this approach did not take into account the whole kinetics of development, focusing on certain particular stages, nor the influence of parental and extrinsic factors other than age.
The aim of this retrospective study is to determine morpho-kinetic factors predictive of implantation and embryo development in IVF/ICSI using machine learning algorithms and relate these morpho-kinetic factors to the mechanical characteristics of cells.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Couples informed non opposed to research
Exclusion Criteria
* Couples under curator or tutorship
* Couples under state xxx
18 Years
43 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Collège de France
UNKNOWN
Institut Curie
OTHER
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
OTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catherine PATRAT, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AP-HP (Professor in Medicine faculty and Hospital practitioner (APHP.centre - Université de Paris, site Cochin)
Jean-Léon MAITRE, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut Curie CNRS UMR3215 INSERM U934
Hervé TURLIER
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Collège de France, CIRB CNRS UMR7241
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP210563
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.