Effect of Superficial Back Line Relaxation Technique on Hamstring Flexibility in Non Specific Low Back Pain Patients

NCT ID: NCT06406894

Last Updated: 2024-11-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current study aim to evaluate the effect of Superficial back line relaxation techniques (SMIT along with CCFE) In Non Specific Low back Pain Patients in order to improve pain and hamstring flexibility.

And To find out the association between sub occipital muscle inhibition technique (SMIT) and cranial cervical flexion exercise (CCFE) in nonspecific low back pain patients with hamstring tightness.

The study aims to enhance the functional status and posture of patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain due to hamstring tightness, thereby enhancing patient efficiency in performing ADLS and IADLS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to recent studies, hamstring tightness gets better as a result of sub occipital muscle inhibition technique, and cranial cervical flexion exercise that improve hamstring flexibility. SMIT is an approach of releasing fascia by application of pressure on sub occipital area. The myofascia relaxes as tone of suboccipital muscle declines that results in reduction in hamstring tone effectively.This is so because the superficial back line of dura matter connects hamstring with sub occipital muscles and neurological system runs through it. In SMIT superficial back line relaxes. While this approach helps suboccipital muscles release degree tension between occiput and axis.

The premise behind CCFE is that cervical spine's dura matter and suboccipital muscle fascia are connected by soft tissue while superficial back line of myofascial chain connects the neck to lower extremity. If tone of suboccipital muscle is reduced,the tone of knee flexors gets minimize and degree of hip flexion gets increase that results in increasing hamstring flexibility. Previous study showed that CCFE restores hamstring flexibility by relaxing superficial back line. While SMI and CCFE represents passive and active exercise program, respectively are equally effective in immediate enhancement of hamstring flexibility.

This study divide in to two groups. Group A ( experimental group) and Group B ( control group). Group A will receive manual technique superficial back line relaxation technique includes (Suboccpital muscle inhibition along with cranial cervical flexion Exercise) with conventional therapy.While group B will receive only conventional therapy include hot pack (lumber region) with low back exercises such as stretching exercise (knee to chest, Pelvis bridging, Cat and camel stretch).

Current study aims to pin point combine effect of SMIT along with CCFE in people with hamstring tightness. Additionally this study will evaluate the immediate and long term effect of SMIT and CCFE on patients with non- specific low back pain by comparing direct and indirect approaches for hamstring flexibility. The study aims to enhance the functional status and posture of patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain due to hamstring tightness, thereby enhancing patient efficiency in performing ADLS and IADLS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain, Mechanical Hamstring Flexibility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

superficial back line relaxation

suboccipital muscle inhibition, cranial cervical flexion exercise

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Superficial back line relaxation (SMIT & CCFE)

Intervention Type OTHER

Experimental group was given superficial back line relaxation includes SMIT \& CCFE along with conventional therapy includes lower limb muscle stretching. SMIT For short term effect 10-12 repetitions per session, on daily basis for 1st week. For long term effect 10-12 repetitions per session, for 3 alternate days in remaining 2nd\&3rd week. CCFE For short term effect 3 sets of 10 reps , 10 sec hold , 1 min rest after each set, on daily basis for 1st week. For long term effect 3 sets of 10 reps, 10 sec hold , 1 min rest after each set, for 3 alternate days , remaining 2nd \& 3rd week. Conventional therapy lower limb muscle stretching ( For short term effect 30 seconds hold , 3 sets of 5 repetitions , 1 min rest after each set, per session on daily basis for 1st week , for long term effect on alternate 3 days in remaining 2nd ,3rd week). Total 12 sessions were given (3 weeks).

Conventional physical therapy

hot packs, muscle stretching exercise of lowerlimb ( Pelvic bridging, knee to chest, Cat and camel stretch)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

lower limb muscle stretching ( pelvic bridging, Knee to chest,cat and camel stretch) (30 seconds hold and 3 sets of 5 repetitions with 1 min rest interval in between each set, per session on daily basis for only one week for immediate results and for long term effect on alternate 3 days in remaining 2nd ,3rd week).

Treatment protocol will be given on daily basis to check immediate effect and for long term effect treatment will be given in alternating 3 days for remaining 2 weeks. Total 12 session were given (3 weeks).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional physical therapy

lower limb muscle stretching ( pelvic bridging, Knee to chest,cat and camel stretch) (30 seconds hold and 3 sets of 5 repetitions with 1 min rest interval in between each set, per session on daily basis for only one week for immediate results and for long term effect on alternate 3 days in remaining 2nd ,3rd week).

Treatment protocol will be given on daily basis to check immediate effect and for long term effect treatment will be given in alternating 3 days for remaining 2 weeks. Total 12 session were given (3 weeks).

Intervention Type OTHER

Superficial back line relaxation (SMIT & CCFE)

Experimental group was given superficial back line relaxation includes SMIT \& CCFE along with conventional therapy includes lower limb muscle stretching. SMIT For short term effect 10-12 repetitions per session, on daily basis for 1st week. For long term effect 10-12 repetitions per session, for 3 alternate days in remaining 2nd\&3rd week. CCFE For short term effect 3 sets of 10 reps , 10 sec hold , 1 min rest after each set, on daily basis for 1st week. For long term effect 3 sets of 10 reps, 10 sec hold , 1 min rest after each set, for 3 alternate days , remaining 2nd \& 3rd week. Conventional therapy lower limb muscle stretching ( For short term effect 30 seconds hold , 3 sets of 5 repetitions , 1 min rest after each set, per session on daily basis for 1st week , for long term effect on alternate 3 days in remaining 2nd ,3rd week). Total 12 sessions were given (3 weeks).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with chronic low back pain associate with hamstring tightness.
* Unilateral or bilateral short hamstring syndrome
* 3 to 6 points in numeric pain rating scale(NPRS).
* Active knee extension more than 20°.
* Presence of hamstring tightness with Popliteal angle more than 30 degree.
* Angle in SLR test should be less than 80°

Exclusion Criteria

* History of cervical spine surgery and neck trauma.
* Cervical and lumber spinal deformity, Herniated disc or protrusions, Spinal stenosis.
* Muscle tendon injuries of the hamstring.
* History of vascular disease in head and neck.
* Visual swelling in the region of hamstring muscle.
* Progressive neurological deficit.
* Fractures in cervical and lumber spine.
* Past and current history of vertigo and dizziness.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sidra Ghais, Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Railway General hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cho SH, Kim SH, Park DJ. The comparison of the immediate effects of application of the suboccipital muscle inhibition and self-myofascial release techniques in the suboccipital region on short hamstring. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):195-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.195. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25642072 (View on PubMed)

Houston MN, Hodson VE, Adams KK, Hoch JM. The effectiveness of whole-body-vibration training in improving hamstring flexibility in physically active adults. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):77-82. doi: 10.1123/JSR.2013-0059.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25606860 (View on PubMed)

Strand SL, Hjelm J, Shoepe TC, Fajardo MA. Norms for an isometric muscle endurance test. J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 9;40:93-102. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0011. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25031677 (View on PubMed)

Coenen P, Gouttebarge V, van der Burght AS, van Dieen JH, Frings-Dresen MH, van der Beek AJ, Burdorf A. The effect of lifting during work on low back pain: a health impact assessment based on a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Dec;71(12):871-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102346. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25165395 (View on PubMed)

Simmonds N, Miller P, Gemmell H. A theoretical framework for the role of fascia in manual therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Jan;16(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22196432 (View on PubMed)

Massoud Arab A, Reza Nourbakhsh M, Mohammadifar A. The relationship between hamstring length and gluteal muscle strength in individuals with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):5-10. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12804993426848.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22294848 (View on PubMed)

Jull GA, Falla D, Vicenzino B, Hodges PW. The effect of therapeutic exercise on activation of the deep cervical flexor muscles in people with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2009 Dec;14(6):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19632880 (View on PubMed)

Jeong ED, Kim CY, Kim SM, Lee SJ, Kim HD. Short-term effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique and cranio-cervical flexion exercise on hamstring flexibility, cranio-vertebral angle, and range of motion of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(6):1025-1034. doi: 10.3233/BMR-171016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30248030 (View on PubMed)

Rogan S, Wust D, Schwitter T, Schmidtbleicher D. Static stretching of the hamstring muscle for injury prevention in football codes: a systematic review. Asian J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;4(1):1-9. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23785569 (View on PubMed)

Ajimsha MS, Daniel B, Chithra S. Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of chronic low back pain in nursing professionals. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24725797 (View on PubMed)

Hart DL, Stratford PW, Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Wang YC. Lumbar computerized adaptive test and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire: relative validity and important change. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;42(6):541-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3942. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22517215 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/MS-PT/01797

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.