Study to Assess the Impact of the Urine Test Cxbladder Triage Plus on the Number of Cystoscopies Performed on Patients With Invisible Blood in Their Urine.

NCT ID: NCT06394869

Last Updated: 2025-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-29

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study includes adult patients who see a urologist because of blood in their urine. The amount is so small it can only be seen with a microscope. This is called microhematuria. There can be many reasons for microhematuria. One of them is bladder cancer. While bladder cancer is one of the biggest worries, it is only found in few of these patients.

Most microhematuria patients will have a cystoscopy to look inside the bladder. During a cystoscopy, a small camera is inserted into the bladder. This is done through the urethra, the tube that passes urine from the bladder to the outside. In some patients it can cause pain or anxiety. Not all patients have a cystoscopy. Those that don't, usually return for a urine sample within 6 months. This is done to check if there is still blood in their urine.

This study is conducted to find out if the use of "Cxbladder Triage Plus" changes the number of cystoscopies in microhematuria patients. Cxbladder Triage Plus is also called "Triage Plus". It is a lab test that was developed to check how likely urothelial carcinoma is present in the bladder. Urothelial carcinoma is by far the most common type of bladder cancer. For the test, the patient voids some urine into a cup. A laboratory then checks the urine of specific genetic material. Abnormalities can be a sign of urothelial carcinoma. The result indicates if the urine is more like most normal urine or more like that of urothelial carcinoma patients.

The study is done to find out how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies. Study participants first void urine into a cup. The urine is used for the Triage Plus test. The patients are then assigned to one of two groups. The assignment is random. This means the nobody can influence the assignment. The chance to be assigned to either group is the same. In the test group, the urologist will receive the Triage Plus result and discuss it with the patient. Together they decide whether to do a cystoscopy. In the control group, the urologist will not receive the Triage Plus result. The patient will also not get the result. The urologist and patient will follow standard of care to decide whether to do a cystoscopy.

For test group patients, the study gives a recommendation whether to proceed with cystoscopy. It is based on the patient's Triage Plus result. The urologist and patient do not need to follow the recommendation. If the urologist does not follow it, they will complete a survey. The survey has only one question. It is asking for the reasons of the decision.

After making their decision, patients will follow the chosen pathway. Data on the performed procedures are collected. The diagnosis will also be documented. Data will be collected for up to about 9 months.

To see how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies, these will be counted in each group and then compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematuria - Cause Not Known

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

microscopic hematuria microhematuria urothelial carcinoma bladder cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test Arm

The site will receive the Cxbladder Detect+ result and the urologist study investigator discuss it with the patient before making a shared decision whether or not to proceed with cystoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cxbladder Triage Plus

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Cxbladder Triage Plus is a lab developed, test that is using RNA and DNA biomarkers in the urine to assess the likelihood of the presence of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder.

Control arm

Neither the site nor the patient will receive the Cxbladder Detect+ result. The decision whether or not to proceed with cystoscopy will be made following standard of care.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cxbladder Triage Plus

Cxbladder Triage Plus is a lab developed, test that is using RNA and DNA biomarkers in the urine to assess the likelihood of the presence of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is referred for assessment of microhematuria (MH) with presentation confirmed by urine microscopy of 3 or more red blood cells per high powered field (RBC/HPF) (documented by the referring physician or at the investigator site) within 6-months of enrollment.
2. Physically able to provide a voided urine sample from a bladder that has not been surgically altered.
3. Able to give informed, written consent.
4. Able and willing to comply with study requirements.
5. Must be 19 or the legal age of consent in the jurisdiction in which the study is taking place to 88 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
6. Ability to comprehend written and spoken English sufficiently to independently follow all study procedures. Or ability to comprehend Spanish with access to an English-Spanish interpreter for all study related verbal instructions and discussions.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior history of bladder malignancy.
2. Prior history of upper tract UC or prostatic urethral UC.
3. Gross hematuria within the last twelve months (reported in patient's records and/or during patient's interview)
4. Reconstructed or diverted bladder (e.g., bladder augmentation, ileal conduit, Indiana pouch)
5. Indication to recommend cystoscopy other than MH (e.g., bothersome benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and desires a procedure, weak stream with concerns for urethral stricture).
6. Cystoscopy contraindicated due to another condition or anatomy.
7. History of pelvic radiation.
8. Currently receiving systemic chemotherapy or has had systemic chemotherapy within the last 6 weeks.
9. History of schistosomiasis.
10. History of chronic (\>3 months) indwelling Foley catheter or chronic (\>3 months) bladder stones.
11. Known current pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

88 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Edge Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tony Lough, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Pacific Edge Limited

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urology Centers of Alabama

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Urology Associates of Mobile

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Advanced Urology Institute - Daytona Beach

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Urologic Specialists of Northwest Indiana

Merrillville, Indiana, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Southern Urology

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Chesapeake Urology Research Associates

Hanover, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Summit Health

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Albany MED Health System

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Integrated Medical Professionals

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley, P. C.

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Penn State Medical Center, Urology Research

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Urology Associates, P. C.

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Donna Smith

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +64212436696

Email: [email protected]

Tony Lough, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +64 (0)21 0223 8591

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Meredith A Sharpton, PA-C

Role: primary

Rita Aderholt, CCRC

Role: backup

Pamela R Manley

Role: primary

Letoya Craig

Role: backup

Samuel Lawindy, MD

Role: primary

Shawna Clemons

Role: primary

Michelle Ramos

Role: backup

Thad Bourque Dr, MD

Role: primary

Simone Olivier

Role: backup

Rian J Dickstein, MD

Role: primary

Alice Drew

Role: primary

Kelley Mauro

Role: backup

Adrien N Bernstein, MD

Role: primary

Laura Davey, CCRC

Role: backup

Michael Yang

Role: primary

Lisa Cotton, RN, BSN, CCRC

Role: primary

Jennifer Rose, LPN, CRC

Role: backup

Sneha Patel

Role: primary

Amy Baggett

Role: primary

Christian Kindred

Role: backup

Kristen R Scarpato, MD

Role: primary

Perla Lopez

Role: primary

Maricruz Ibarra

Role: backup

Rebecca Marrah

Role: primary

Abigail Wiedmer

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CXB/2024/CREDIBLE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id