Safely Reduce Cystoscopic Evaluations for Hematuria Patients

NCT ID: NCT06026189

Last Updated: 2023-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-31

Study Completion Date

2027-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The SeARCH-trial assess the clinical impact of a molecular urine test as a 'urine-first' strategy in the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Microscopic hematuria (MH) can be a sign of an underlying disease, including malignancy of the urinary tract, and is reason for referral to a urology clinic. The current standard diagnostic workup for MH patients includes visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy and upper tract imaging to rule out the presence of a tumor in the urinary tract. However, the a priori risk of cancer in patients with MH is only 2-5%. Consequently, 95% of MH patients unnecessarily undergo invasive procedures, which are: I) uncomfortable and stressful for patients, II) has a significant impact on limited available (financial) resources and III) a CT scan is accompanied by exposure to ionizing radiation.

Previously we developed a molecular urine assay to detect urinary tract cancer in hematuria patients that had robust diagnostic performance; a negative predictive value \>99%, sensitivity, and specificity \>90%. The SeARCH-trial evaluates the clinical impact of a urine assay as a 'urine-first' strategy, meaning that only patients with an abnormal urine test results undergo invasive diagnostics. In this multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial we compare clinical outcomes by using a 'urine-first' strategy to 'care-as-usual', which is a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in all patients presenting with MH. In addition, we assess patients' preferences, patients reported outcome measurements, and healthcare costs to show that a 'urine-first' strategy improves patients' quality of life and results in a more appropriate use of limited available resources.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematuria Urothelial Neoplasm Urothelial Carcinoma Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A multicenter, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Care-as-usual

In the ''care-as-usual'' arm, all patients undergo 'care-as-usual', i.e. a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging (ultrasound or CT-scan)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

'Urine-first' strategy

In the intervention arm, the urine test is used to triage patients for a diagnostic workup ('urine-first' strategy). Only patients with an abnormal test result undergo cystoscopy and upper tract imaging.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

urine-first strategy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Only patients with an abnormal urine test result undergo a diagnostic workup, i.e. cystoscopy and upper-tract imaging.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

urine-first strategy

Only patients with an abnormal urine test result undergo a diagnostic workup, i.e. cystoscopy and upper-tract imaging.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Microscopically confirmed microscopic hematuria of voided urine defined as ≥3 erythrocytes per high power field
* Male patients ≥40 years
* Female patients ≥50 years

Exclusion Criteria

* History of urothelial bladder- or urinary tract cancer
* Presence of macroscopic (visible) hematuria
* Woman who is or may be pregnant
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

J.L. Boormans, MD PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SeARCH-trial Pijpers

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

J.L. Boormans, Prof. MD

Role: primary

0031 107040251

O.M. Pijpers, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Erasmus MC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Urell and Pregnancy
NCT01818180 TERMINATED NA