MicroUDxTM: a Rapid Diagnostic Tool That Will Prevent Death and Disability From Common Infections
NCT ID: NCT04228081
Last Updated: 2022-06-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
10000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Antibiotics are a major underpinning of modern medicine. The global rise of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) organisms is a serious world health problem. With few new antimicrobial drugs on the horizon, it is imperative that we develop novel approaches to extend the service life of our existing drugs. AMR is a complex problem that is being driven by a wide range of factors. More than half of the antibiotics prescribed have no medical benefit, and outpatient visits for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a major contributor to this problem. Recent studies have shown that nearly half of people treated for UTIs receive the wrong frontline drug and in 75% of patients, the duration of therapy is inappropriate. Limitations in the current diagnostic technology make it impossible to identify UTI pathogens and measure their antibiotic sensitivities during the short out-patient clinical visits that are typical for most UTI patients. These circumstances result in the inappropriate use of stronger than necessary or inappropriate antimicrobials. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a system that can detect bacteria in urine and find the best antibiotic in under 4 hours, thus enabling a rapid diagnosis and use of the most appropriate and cost-effective antimicrobial agent for the agent detected.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis of Subclinical Urinary Tract Infections Using Advanced Microbiome Survey Techniques in High Risk Trauma Patients
NCT01834391
Rapid Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis and Real-time Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support
NCT03256825
Dipsticks and Microscopy to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Women's Urinary Tract Infections: a Pilot Trial (MicUTI)
NCT05667207
DIagnoSing Care hOme UTI Study
NCT05880329
Analysis of Bacterial Multidrug Tolerance in Patients Prone to Urinary Tract Infections
NCT06724588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During the first phase of the study, metabolic biomarkers for uropathogens will be identified using mass spectrometry on sub-cultures of frozen isolates from the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. This will include at least 50 isolates each of uropathogens consisting of but not limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species, and Candida species. Biomarkers that are present in greater than 95% of the isolates will subsequently be using the analysis of 2000 negative, and 2000 positive urine cultures. Compounds that are subsequently identified as high yield will be selected for carbon 13 labeling to service standards.
In phase II of the study, following the development of a biomarker enrichment device at the CMRF, a performance urinalysis of the device will be conducted using residual urine sample from 1000 negative and 2000 positive urine specimens as outlined above. The performance of the new device will be evaluated relative to standard cultures and urine liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Following the creation of a sensitive and specific assay, a prospective study will be carried out at the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. 3000 sample submitted for urine culture will be process in parallel with the new device and standard microbiology procedures. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value for each analyte compared to standard culture will be determined in this portion of the study. Cost calculations and performance characteristics including turnaround time of the new assay will be compared to that in the standard laboratory procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
UTI Positive
In phase I of the study testing residual urine samples the aim is to include at least 50 positive samples from each bacterial species known to be commonly associated with urinary tract infections. We selected 2000 positive urines to enable capturing enough of these organisms in the development process.
For phase II of the study, the same number of positive samples in order to include all common species causing urinary tract infection. The number of negative samples included is reduced to 1000.
Phase 3 - approximately one third of all urine sample submitted will be positive for a uropathogen. Sample size of 3000 we expect 1000 these to be culture positive. We expect most uropathogens occurring at a frequency of 5% or more will be included with sufficient numbers in the validation process.
No interventions assigned to this group
UTI Negative Control
2000 negative urine samples are being run as controlled to ensure the false positivity rate is low.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Health services
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ian Lewis
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ian A Lewis, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB19-00442
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.