Study on Effects of Defect Closure in Laparoscopic Repair of Direct Inguinal Hernia
NCT ID: NCT06389331
Last Updated: 2024-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
88 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-01
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
NCT05107986
Bilateral vs Unilateral Totally Extraperitoneal Repair Among Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia
NCT06380621
Comparison of Laparoscopic Herniotomy and Open Herniotomy in Children
NCT06356987
The Effect of Sutures Versus Mesh in Umbilical Hernia Repair
NCT01635868
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Seroma formation is a frequent complication of laparoscopic mesh repair of moderate-large direct inguinal hernia defects. While rates of seroma formation have been reported to be as high as 10-30%. Several attempts have been made to reduce the incidence of seroma formation, such as tacking the transversalis fascia (TF) to the ramus of the pubis, closing the direct inguinal hernia defect via the endoloop technique, and filling the potential dead space with fibrin glue. However, there is a potential increase in the risk of infection and also a risk of chronic pubic bone pain from the tack staples or vasculo-nervous injury if fixing the TF to the abdominal wall, which would lead to extra discomfort for the patient. The closure of a direct hernia defect with a barbed suture not only closes the defect superficially but also exterminates the defect cavity; consequently, the incidence of seroma formation has been greatly reduced.
However, there is still controversial evidence regarding the choice of the two procedures in terms of reducing the rate of seroma formation and pain. Thus, it is ambiguous which surgical technique should be considered best to repair an inguinal hernia. In this study, we tried to evaluate the technical aspect of direct defect closure in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair and its effect on the primary outcomes in terms of seroma formation and pain at different time intervals, along with the secondary outcomes such as operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, days to resume normal activities, recurrence, and intraoperative complications like injury to the vas, vessel, and visceral injury or peritoneal tear.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
defect closure
the fascia transversalis (pseudo sac) was pulled and incorporated into closure with a non-absorbable polypropylene barbed monofilament size-0 suture
closed the defect with barbed suture
In direct hernia, content was reduced, and the fascia transversalis (pseudo sac) was pulled and incorporated into closure with a non-absorbable polypropylene barbed monofilament size-0 suture
non closure group
defect was left open
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
closed the defect with barbed suture
In direct hernia, content was reduced, and the fascia transversalis (pseudo sac) was pulled and incorporated into closure with a non-absorbable polypropylene barbed monofilament size-0 suture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia (≥M3)
Exclusion Criteria
* complicated hernia (irreducible, obstructed, or recurrent hernia)
* patients unfit for general anesthesia
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vijay Pratap Sah
doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
B. P. Koirala institute of health science
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vijay Pratap Sah
Malaṅgawā, Madhesh Pradesh, Nepal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):413-26. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46027-5.
McKernan JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc. 1993 Jan-Feb;7(1):26-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00591232.
Usmani F, Wijerathne S, Malik S, Yeo C, Rao J, Lomanto D. Effect of direct defect closure during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ("TEP/TAPP plus" technique) on post-operative outcomes. Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):167-171. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02036-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
Kockerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, Fortelny R, Niebuhr H, Mayer F, Schug-Pass C. Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures. Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2222-2231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5912-3. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRC/1971/020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.