Effects of Hernia Repair on Men's Sexual Functions

NCT ID: NCT03326700

Last Updated: 2017-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the literature, there are several studies that compare Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) with Lichtenstein hernia (LH) repair. There are no studies that compare sexual functions on men's health and quality of life. Our aim was to study the sexual functions of men, who underwent TEP or LH repair according to Health Survey Scoring Demonstration (SF36) and The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

176 men with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups. Group T (n=88) underwent TEP and Group L(n:88) underwent LH repair. Patients demografigs, perioperative findings were recorded. For all patients preoperative, postoperative 7th,30th and 90th day SF 36 and IIEF were filled up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal Men Sexual Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

176 men with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized in two groups. Group T(n=88) were operated TEP and Group L(n:88) were operated by LH repair. Patients demografigs, perioperative findings were recorded. For all patients preoperative, postoperative 7th,30th and 90th day SF 36 and IIEF were filled up.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic hernia repair.

Intervention: inguinal hernia repair.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inguinal Hernia Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inguinal hernia repair is surgery to repair a hernia in the groin. A hernia is tissue that bulges out of a weak spot in the abdominal wall. The intestine may bulge out through this weakened area. During surgery to repair the hernia, the bulging tissue is pushed back in. The abdominal wall is strengthened and supported with sutures (stitches), and sometimes mesh. This repair can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery.

Open hernia repair.

Intervention: inguinal hernia repair.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inguinal Hernia Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inguinal hernia repair is surgery to repair a hernia in the groin. A hernia is tissue that bulges out of a weak spot in the abdominal wall. The intestine may bulge out through this weakened area. During surgery to repair the hernia, the bulging tissue is pushed back in. The abdominal wall is strengthened and supported with sutures (stitches), and sometimes mesh. This repair can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inguinal Hernia Repair

Inguinal hernia repair is surgery to repair a hernia in the groin. A hernia is tissue that bulges out of a weak spot in the abdominal wall. The intestine may bulge out through this weakened area. During surgery to repair the hernia, the bulging tissue is pushed back in. The abdominal wall is strengthened and supported with sutures (stitches), and sometimes mesh. This repair can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* having male gender
* patients diagnosed on unilateral inguinal hernia
* patients aged between 18 and 65 years
* ASA I and II patients

Exclusion Criteria

* having female gender
* patients diagnosed on bilateral or recurrence inguinal hernia,
* patients suffering erectile dysfunction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Riza Gurhan ISIL

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kushwaha JK, Enny LE, Anand A, Sonkar AA, Kumar A, Pahwa HS. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) Versus Open Stoppa Inguinal Hernioplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):257-261. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000450.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28727632 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SEEAH 2015 / 568

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id