Shock and Acute Conditions OutcOmes Platform

NCT ID: NCT06376318

Last Updated: 2024-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In-hospital mortality of patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) for circulatory shock remains high (between 20 and 40%).

Currently, there are no markers that allow us to classify patients with circulatory shock at higher risk of early and late bad outcomes, or who may better respond to a specific intervention.

To understand the contribution of biological heterogeneity to circulatory shock independently from its etiology, the ShockCO-OP Research Program aims to use clustering approaches to re-analyze existing clinical and molecular data from several large European and North American prospective cohorts and clinical trials.

This will enable an improvement in risk prediction and a better patient selection in future clinical trials to assess a personalized therapy (i.e., prospective enrollment based on a biological/molecular signature).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, circulatory shock subgroups are defined according to hemodynamic profile (e.g., hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic) and etiology (e.g., trauma, infection, myocardial infarction among others) and are incorrectly considered as homogeneous clinical syndromes. Emerging translational evidence highlights the existing molecular heterogeneity in the circulatory shock syndrome. Such findings raise a major issue in assessing neutral clinical trial results in circulatory shock as a given intervention effect (e.g., fluid management, vasopressors/inotropes, mechanical circulatory support) may preferentially impact different subgroups (i.e., heterogeneity of treatment effect).

Accordingly, identifying distinct biological subphenotypes with different mechanistic signatures may provide new insights regarding the pathophysiology of circulatory shock. This may allow predictive enrichment (i.e., identifying those patients most likely to benefit from a particular therapy) and biomarker-driven or phenotype-driven patient selection in future clinical trials to assess a personalized therapy (i.e., prospective enrollment based on a biological signature).

The ShockCO-OP Research Program aims to use unsupervised model-based clustering (i.e., regardless of outcome) to reanalyze existing clinical and biological data in several European and North American prospective cohorts and clinical trials to identify distinct biomarker-driven subphenotypes in circulatory shock syndromes, their underlying molecular signatures (proteomics, transcriptomics), their association with outcome and their response to different interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Circulatory Shock Sepsis Cardiogenic Shock Major Trauma Surgical Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inotrope

Vasopressors: Norepinephrine, vasopressin Inotropes: Epinephrine, Dobutamine, Milrinone

Intervention Type DRUG

Mechanical circulatory support

Intra-aortic balloon pump Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

anti-bodies

Anti-Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3), Anti-Bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vasopressor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with circulatory shock on admission (i.e., the reported main cause of admission is septic shock, cardiogenic shock or hypovolemic/hemorrhagic shock).
2. Patients who required vasopressors infusion and presented signs of tissue hypoperfusion (e.g., altered mental state (Glasgow coma scale≤ 14), oliguria (urine output of \< 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least six hours) or a serum lactate level of ≥2 mmol/l) within the first 24 h after admission.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Mechanical circulatory support on admission
2. Serious arrythmia (e.g., rapid atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) on admission
3. Deceased patients within the first 24 hours after admission.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Helsinki

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leipzig

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nancy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sabri SOUSSI

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claudia dos Santos, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unity Health Toronto

Alexandre Mebazaa, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

St Louis and Lariboisiere Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Soussi S, Dos Santos C, Jentzer JC, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Poss J, Schaubroeck H, Billia F, Marshall JC, Lawler PR. Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Aug 18;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00531-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37592121 (View on PubMed)

Sarma D, Jentzer JC, Soussi S. Cardiogenic shock: a major challenge for the clinical trialist. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Aug 1;29(4):371-380. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001066. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37338937 (View on PubMed)

Mebazaa A, Soussi S. Precision Medicine in Cardiogenic Shock: We Are Almost There! JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;11(10):1316-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Aug 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37589609 (View on PubMed)

Soussi S, Collins GS, Juni P, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Le Manach Y. Evaluation of Biomarkers in Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine: A Clinician's Overview of Traditional Statistical Methods and Machine Learning Algorithms. Anesthesiology. 2021 Jan 1;134(1):15-25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003600.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33216849 (View on PubMed)

Soussi S, Tarvasmaki T, Kimmoun A, Ahmadiankalati M, Azibani F, Dos Santos CC, Duarte K, Gayat E, Jentzer JC, Harjola VP, Hibbert B, Jung C, Johan L, Levy B, Lu Z, Lawler PR, Marshall JC, Poss J, Sadoune M, Nguyen A, Raynor A, Peoc'h K, Thiele H, Mathew R, Mebazaa A. Identifying biomarker-driven subphenotypes of cardiogenic shock: analysis of prospective cohorts and randomized controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 18;79:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103013. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39802301 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sepsis in the ICU-II
NCT04695119 RECRUITING
Remote Ischemic Postconditioning in Septic Shock
NCT07273942 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA