Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-01
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, there are no markers that allow us to classify patients with circulatory shock at higher risk of early and late bad outcomes, or who may better respond to a specific intervention.
To understand the contribution of biological heterogeneity to circulatory shock independently from its etiology, the ShockCO-OP Research Program aims to use clustering approaches to re-analyze existing clinical and molecular data from several large European and North American prospective cohorts and clinical trials.
This will enable an improvement in risk prediction and a better patient selection in future clinical trials to assess a personalized therapy (i.e., prospective enrollment based on a biological/molecular signature).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Severe Septic Shock Complications
NCT03716895
Evolution of Tissue Perfusion and Venous Congestion Markers in Fluid-Responsive Septic Shock Patients
NCT06958809
Hemodynamic Phenotype-Based,Capillary Refill Time-Targeted Resuscitation In Early Septic Shock:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2
NCT06062303
Monitoring Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT01747057
Protocol-driven Hemodynamic Support for Patients With Septic Shock
NCT00335907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Accordingly, identifying distinct biological subphenotypes with different mechanistic signatures may provide new insights regarding the pathophysiology of circulatory shock. This may allow predictive enrichment (i.e., identifying those patients most likely to benefit from a particular therapy) and biomarker-driven or phenotype-driven patient selection in future clinical trials to assess a personalized therapy (i.e., prospective enrollment based on a biological signature).
The ShockCO-OP Research Program aims to use unsupervised model-based clustering (i.e., regardless of outcome) to reanalyze existing clinical and biological data in several European and North American prospective cohorts and clinical trials to identify distinct biomarker-driven subphenotypes in circulatory shock syndromes, their underlying molecular signatures (proteomics, transcriptomics), their association with outcome and their response to different interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inotrope
Vasopressors: Norepinephrine, vasopressin Inotropes: Epinephrine, Dobutamine, Milrinone
Mechanical circulatory support
Intra-aortic balloon pump Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
anti-bodies
Anti-Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3), Anti-Bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who required vasopressors infusion and presented signs of tissue hypoperfusion (e.g., altered mental state (Glasgow coma scale≤ 14), oliguria (urine output of \< 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least six hours) or a serum lactate level of ≥2 mmol/l) within the first 24 h after admission.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Serious arrythmia (e.g., rapid atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) on admission
3. Deceased patients within the first 24 hours after admission.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Helsinki
OTHER
University of Ottawa
OTHER
University of Leipzig
OTHER
University of Nancy
OTHER
McGill University
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
OTHER
University of Toronto
OTHER
Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sabri SOUSSI
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudia dos Santos, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Alexandre Mebazaa, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
St Louis and Lariboisiere Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soussi S, Dos Santos C, Jentzer JC, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Poss J, Schaubroeck H, Billia F, Marshall JC, Lawler PR. Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Aug 18;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00531-5.
Sarma D, Jentzer JC, Soussi S. Cardiogenic shock: a major challenge for the clinical trialist. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Aug 1;29(4):371-380. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001066. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
Mebazaa A, Soussi S. Precision Medicine in Cardiogenic Shock: We Are Almost There! JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;11(10):1316-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Aug 16. No abstract available.
Soussi S, Collins GS, Juni P, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Le Manach Y. Evaluation of Biomarkers in Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine: A Clinician's Overview of Traditional Statistical Methods and Machine Learning Algorithms. Anesthesiology. 2021 Jan 1;134(1):15-25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003600.
Soussi S, Tarvasmaki T, Kimmoun A, Ahmadiankalati M, Azibani F, Dos Santos CC, Duarte K, Gayat E, Jentzer JC, Harjola VP, Hibbert B, Jung C, Johan L, Levy B, Lu Z, Lawler PR, Marshall JC, Poss J, Sadoune M, Nguyen A, Raynor A, Peoc'h K, Thiele H, Mathew R, Mebazaa A. Identifying biomarker-driven subphenotypes of cardiogenic shock: analysis of prospective cohorts and randomized controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 18;79:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103013. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.