Outcome of Plastibell Circumcision Versus Open Method Circumcision

NCT ID: NCT06366984

Last Updated: 2024-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

174 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-11

Study Completion Date

2022-08-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the outcomes of plastibell circumcision method with open surgical technique in infants presenting at tertiary care hospital.

Methods This randomized controlled trial (NCT??) was conducted at Pediatric surgery department, the Children's hospital and the University of Child health, Lahore. Study was carried out over a period of six months from 11-01-2022 to 11-07-2022. Non probability, purposive sampling was used. 174 infants presenting for circumcision were admitted and assigned a method of circumcision randomly. They were randomly divided in to 2 groups by using opaque sealed envelope technique. Infants in group A were underwent plastibell circumcision while infants in group B were underwent open technique circumcision. 87 circumcisions were performed by each method. The informed consent was taken from parents for inclusion into the study. All infants were underwent circumcision under local anesthesia as per assigned method. Same preoperative, per-operative, and postoperative care was given to each regardless of the technique. These patients were followed for 3 hours to assess bleeding as per operational definition. Then followed on an outpatient basis every 6th day until complete healing is achieved (30 days).The data regarding age, weight, duration of procedure, wound infection and post circumcision bleeding was recorded in a predesigned performa. (As per operational definition).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Circumcision is a surgical method in which surgical removal of the prepuce (foreskin) is done. Religious, cultural, medical, and common public health reasons are known to be the major indications for this procedure. It is usually done in neonatal age but can also be performed at any age. The WHO has begun to recommend circumcision on the basis of studies indicating its positive effects on human health and especially its role in protection from AIDS. As with adult circumcision, neonatal circumcision may be helpful to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV infection, phimosis and paraphimosis in future adult life. Though Circumcision is one of the commonest procedures in the surgery, still a gold standard approach is not defined. In Pakistan most circumcisions are done in neonatal or infant life, or circumcised in the adult age group. It is a relatively simple procedure with healing time up to 2 weeks.

There are many advantages of male circumcision at younger age than older, which include lower risk of complications, lower cost, and faster healing. Different techniques are being in practice like Plastibell method, Mogen Clamp, bone cutter technique and Free-hand open surgical method.

This randomized control trial was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, The Children's Hospital and University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore from 11-01-2022 to 11-07-2022. After approval from the ethical review committee of the hospital, all infants came for circumcision were included except those who need redo circumcision or have Inadequate clinical record or have hypospadias or who are syndromic children.

174 infants presenting for circumcision were admitted and assigned a method of circumcision randomly. They were randomly divided in to 2 groups by using opaque sealed envelope technique. Infants in group A were underwent plastibell circumcision while infants in group B were underwent open technique circumcision. 87 circumcisions were performed by each method. The informed consent was taken from parents for inclusion into the study. All infants were underwent circumcision under local anesthesia as per assigned method. Same preoperative, per-operative, and postoperative care was given to each regardless of the technique. These patients were followed for 3 hours to assess bleeding as per operational definition. Then followed on an outpatient basis every 6th day until complete healing is achieved (30 days).The data regarding age, weight, duration of procedure, wound infection and post circumcision bleeding was recorded in a predesigned performa. (As per operational definition).

The data was entered in SPSS version 23 and analyzed through it. Means and SD was calculated for quantitative variables like age, weight and operation time. Frequency and percentage was calculated for qualitative variables like bleeding and wound infection. Outcomes i.e bleeding and wound infection were compared between both groups by using Chi-square test. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding Site Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controll trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
outcome assessor is unaware of group allocated

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plastibell group

plastibell method applied for circumcision

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

plastibell

Intervention Type OTHER

plastibell used for circumcision

open method circumcision

open method of circumcision applied

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

open method

Intervention Type OTHER

open method used for circumcision

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

plastibell

plastibell used for circumcision

Intervention Type OTHER

open method

open method used for circumcision

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all uncircumcised male

Exclusion Criteria

* hypospadias, syndromic children
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Months

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhammad Adeel Ashiq

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Muhammad A Ashiq, M.S

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Children hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Children Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Adeel4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.