Circumcision Versus Preputioplasty for BXO in Children

NCT ID: NCT02854995

Last Updated: 2018-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traditionally, BXO is managed with circumcision (surgical removal of the foreskin) and this approach has long been held as the 'gold standard. Whilst this may be curative in many cases, it has been shown that 20% of boys require a further operative procedure on their penis to widen the urethral opening (to treat meatal stenosis)

An alternative to circumcision was proposed: a preputioplasty (surgery to widen the opening of the foreskin) was combined with injection of steroids into the affected foreskin. Subsequently, the same group compared the outcomes of this technique with circumcision, and reported circumcision was successfully avoided in 92% of the preputioplasty group. In addition, the rate of meatal stenosis (narrowing of the urethral opening requiring surgery) was significantly lower (6% vs 19%, P = .034 ). Preputioplasty may therefore: (i) offer protection against meatal stenosis and reduce the requirement for further surgery; and (ii) offer the benefit of retaining the foreskin, the function of which, while debated, likely includes sexual function. In view of these potential benefits, authors have called for a randomised trial to compare circumcision to preputioplasty and injection of steroids.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The interventions to be compared are operations to treat BXO called:

(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce. The two study team members performing the surgery in this trial (HC and SK) will be free to choose the method of circumcision (e.g. guillotine vs. sleeve) as this is not thought to influence outcome. The foreskin will be sent for histological analysis.

(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone. Briefly, longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile. A biopsy of an area of affected foreskin will be sent for histological analysis. The intention will be to perform three incisions (tri-radiate) but the final decision on how many will be made by the operating surgeon and based on the appearance of the prepuce and result of initial incision(s). Once the prepuce is felt to be freely retractile, 1 - 3 mL of triamcinolone (Adcortyl Bristol-Myers Squibb 10 mg/mL) will be injected intradermally around the circumference of the affected foreskin using a 25-gauge needle.

These procedures are established treatments for BXO and currently in use by the trial surgeons in the same setting as the trial.The preputioplasty with injection of triamcinolone procedure has previously been approved by the Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Trust Clinical Development Evaluation Group (CDEG).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

circumcision

(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce.

Group Type OTHER

circumcision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce. The two study team members performing the surgery in this trial (HC and SK) will be free to choose the method of circumcision (e.g. guillotine vs. sleeve) as this is not thought to influence outcome. The foreskin will be sent for histological analysis.

preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone

(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone: longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile.

Group Type OTHER

preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone:

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone: this will be performed as described by Wilkinson et al.\[5\] Briefly, longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile. A biopsy of an area of affected foreskin will be sent for histological analysis. The intention will be to perform three incisions (tri-radiate) but the final decision on how many will be made by the operating surgeon and based on the appearance of the prepuce and result of initial incision(s). Once the prepuce is felt to be freely retractile, 1 - 3 mL of triamcinolone (Adcortyl Bristol-Myers Squibb 10 mg/mL) will be injected intradermally around the circumference of the affected foreskin using a 25-gauge needle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

circumcision

(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce. The two study team members performing the surgery in this trial (HC and SK) will be free to choose the method of circumcision (e.g. guillotine vs. sleeve) as this is not thought to influence outcome. The foreskin will be sent for histological analysis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone:

(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone: this will be performed as described by Wilkinson et al.\[5\] Briefly, longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile. A biopsy of an area of affected foreskin will be sent for histological analysis. The intention will be to perform three incisions (tri-radiate) but the final decision on how many will be made by the operating surgeon and based on the appearance of the prepuce and result of initial incision(s). Once the prepuce is felt to be freely retractile, 1 - 3 mL of triamcinolone (Adcortyl Bristol-Myers Squibb 10 mg/mL) will be injected intradermally around the circumference of the affected foreskin using a 25-gauge needle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged between 2 and 16 years
* diagnosed with BXO
* require surgery to treat BXO

Exclusion Criteria

* previous penile surgery
* circumcision or preputioplasty medically contraindicated
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alder Hey Children's Hospital

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lansdale N, Arthur F, Corbett HJ. Circumcision versus preputioplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans: a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128(6):759-765. doi: 10.1111/bju.15508. Epub 2021 Jul 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34110689 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BXO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.