Concealed Penis in Pediatric Age Group

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Comparison between three different surgical techniques in the management of concealed penis. Methods: This prospective interventional non-randomized study included 150 pediatric patients with concealed penis. They were distributed equally into three groups; group A; patients treated by phallopexy only, group B; patients treated by complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia \& group C; patients treated by both phallopexy and dartos excision.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Graft Versus Flap in Management of Proximal Penile Hypospadias

NCT06565286

Proximal Penile Hypospadias

RECRUITING NA

The Optimal Urethral Coverage in Hypospadias Repair: Dartos Fascia Versus Tunica Vaginalis Flap? A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT05123833

Pediatric Disorder Hypospadias Congenital Hypospadia +1 more

UNKNOWN NA

Preputial Graft Urethroplasty in Primary Repair of Hypospadias

NCT05660564

Completed

COMPLETED

Does Graft Improves the Outcome TIP Repair for Primary Distal Hypospadias?

NCT05528276

Penile Hypospadias

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of Double Faced Transverse Preputial Onlay Island Flap for Hypospadias Repair in Pediatrics

NCT05144659

Hypospadias

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Comparison between three different surgical techniques in the management of concealed penis. Methods: This prospective interventional non-randomized study included 150 pediatric patients with concealed penis. They were distributed equally into three groups; group A; patients treated by anchoring the penile skin dermis to Buck's fascia at the penile base at 3 \& 9 o'clock points using PDS 5/0 (phallopexy), group B; patients treated by complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia \& group C; patients treated by phallopexy as in group A after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia. Follow-up at the end of the 1st post-operative week and then monthly for 6 months as regards penile skin congestion and/or necrosis, wound infection, edema, and/or re-retraction was carried out.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pediatric ALL Surgery Urologic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phallopexy group

phallopexy only

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Circumcision in concealed penis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comparison of three surgical techniques (as described in the arms) in the management of concealed penis in pediatrics

Dartos excision group

complete circumferential dissection and excision of dartos fascia only

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Circumcision in concealed penis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comparison of three surgical techniques (as described in the arms) in the management of concealed penis in pediatrics

Combined phallopexy and dartos excision group

phallopexy as in patients of group A but after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Circumcision in concealed penis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comparison of three surgical techniques (as described in the arms) in the management of concealed penis in pediatrics

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Circumcision in concealed penis

comparison of three surgical techniques (as described in the arms) in the management of concealed penis in pediatrics

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with a buried penis at or below the pubic skin level with a stretched penile length for all of them within the normal range according to their ages as titrated in the literature

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with any associated anomalies like hypospadias, torsion, penoscrotal web, micropenis, mega-prepuce, or chordae were excluded from the study.

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No