Does Graft Improves the Outcome TIP Repair for Primary Distal Hypospadias?
NCT ID: NCT05528276
Last Updated: 2022-09-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-29
2024-10-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preputial Graft Urethroplasty in Primary Repair of Hypospadias
NCT05660564
Cosmotic Outcome of Distal Penile Hypospidias Repair Using Stitch by Stitch Glanuloplasty Versus TIP
NCT05742529
Fibrin-Enhanced TIP Versus Grafted TIP Urethroplasty in Distal Hypospadias
NCT07319780
Is Dorsal Inlay Graft (DIG) With TIP Repair Superior to TIP Alone for Primary Hypospadias?
NCT07086963
Pearls and Pitfalls in Usage of Plasma-Rich Platelet Graft Versus Dartos Flap in Distal Penile Hypospadias Repair
NCT06808139
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (sTIPU)
Repair surgery
1. a circumscribing skin incision was made 2 mm below the hypospadias meatus,
2. penile degloving,
3. the para-urethral plate incision was made,
4. A vertical midline incision of the urethral plate was made from within the hypospadiac meatus and extended up to the mid-glans.
5. The urethral plate was tubularised, beginning proximally, and closed in two layers using 6/0 polyglactin 910 suture.
6. The neomeatus was formed on a catheter 2 F larger than the urethral stent.
7. A flap was harvested from the prepuce to cover the neourethra and finally glanuloplasty.
8. A suitable urethral stent was left in situ for 7-10 days, with a compressive dressing applied.
* Grafted tubularised incised-plate .
1.Same steps but adding a graft (dorsal inlay) , 2. The graft will be taken from the inner preputial skin . 3. The graft will be sutured to overlying plate incision line from the old meatus to the tip of the glans.
Preputial inlay graft urethroplasty (PIGU)
Repair surgery
1. a circumscribing skin incision was made 2 mm below the hypospadias meatus,
2. penile degloving,
3. the para-urethral plate incision was made,
4. A vertical midline incision of the urethral plate was made from within the hypospadiac meatus and extended up to the mid-glans.
5. The urethral plate was tubularised, beginning proximally, and closed in two layers using 6/0 polyglactin 910 suture.
6. The neomeatus was formed on a catheter 2 F larger than the urethral stent.
7. A flap was harvested from the prepuce to cover the neourethra and finally glanuloplasty.
8. A suitable urethral stent was left in situ for 7-10 days, with a compressive dressing applied.
* Grafted tubularised incised-plate .
1.Same steps but adding a graft (dorsal inlay) , 2. The graft will be taken from the inner preputial skin . 3. The graft will be sutured to overlying plate incision line from the old meatus to the tip of the glans.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repair surgery
1. a circumscribing skin incision was made 2 mm below the hypospadias meatus,
2. penile degloving,
3. the para-urethral plate incision was made,
4. A vertical midline incision of the urethral plate was made from within the hypospadiac meatus and extended up to the mid-glans.
5. The urethral plate was tubularised, beginning proximally, and closed in two layers using 6/0 polyglactin 910 suture.
6. The neomeatus was formed on a catheter 2 F larger than the urethral stent.
7. A flap was harvested from the prepuce to cover the neourethra and finally glanuloplasty.
8. A suitable urethral stent was left in situ for 7-10 days, with a compressive dressing applied.
* Grafted tubularised incised-plate .
1.Same steps but adding a graft (dorsal inlay) , 2. The graft will be taken from the inner preputial skin . 3. The graft will be sutured to overlying plate incision line from the old meatus to the tip of the glans.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. De-novo penile hypospadias after degloving of penis intraoperative (fresh, not previously operated)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Ventral Penile curvature ≥30° after penile degloving \& artificial erection, (requiring transection of urethral plate).
3. Uretheral plate less than 6mm
4. Megameatus intact prepuce
5. Albumin less than 3.5 g/dL
1 Year
12 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdelrahman Mohamed Abdelkader
teaching assistant of urology & andrology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut university hospital
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alshafei A, Cascio S, Boland F, O'Shea N, Hickey A, Quinn F. Comparing the outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty in children with hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
Liu MM, Holland AJ, Cass DT. Assessment of postoperative outcomes of hypospadias repair with validated questionnaires. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;50(12):2071-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.047. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
Pfistermuller KL, McArdle AJ, Cuckow PM. Meta-analysis of complication rates of the tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
Seleim HM, ElSheemy MS, Abdalazeem Y, Abdullateef KS, Arafa MA, Shouman AM, Elsaket H, Kaddah SN, Elbarbary MM. Comprehensive evaluation of grafting the preservable narrow plates with consideration of native plate width at primary hypospadias surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):345.e1-345.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 9.
Ahmed M, Alsaid A. Is combined inner preputial inlay graft with tubularized incised plate in hypospadias repair worth doing? J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Aug;11(4):229.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
hypospadias repair
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.