Assessment of Effectiveness and Stimulation Coverage of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy in Patients with Cervical Lead Placement

NCT ID: NCT06359561

Last Updated: 2024-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-05

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Title Assessment of effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Device used in the study The Saluda Medical EvokeTM Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulator (CL-SCS) System (Evoke System). The CE marked Evoke System will be used within its licensed use and manuals. The Evoke System measures and records spinal cord (SC) activation resulting from stimulation via evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). The Evoke System can be programmed to provide ECAP-controlled, closed-loop SCS or open-loop, fixed-output (traditional) SCS; ECAPs may be measured and recorded in either stimulation mode.

Indication for use The Evoke SCS System is indicated as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs and will be used within its licensed indication during this study.

Rational This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Study design An observational, prospective, multi-center, single-arm study. Study population Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.

Objectives

* Evaluate stimulation coverage in pain area and other parts of the body, sensation (awareness and quality) and pain relief using a 0-10 numeric rating score (NRS) in patient implanted with one or two leads at cervical level receiving closed-loop spinal cord stimulator (CL-SCS) therapy.
* Assessment of holistic outcomes: measure quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) assessed by the PROMIS-29 questionnaire.
* Evaluate medication intake, patient satisfaction and patient global impression of change (PGIC).
* Assessment of device data and programming parameters.
* Neurophysiological measurements: neuronal activation, conduction velocity and posture change assessment.

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trail and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.
* Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
* Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
* Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent. Exclusion criteria
* Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.

Burden and Risk

* There will be no additional burden associated with participation in the study. The data will be collected during the standard of care visits. Data collection required by the study protocol will add no additional time to standard clinical appointments, as the data will be downloaded from the clinical interface or entered directly into the database.
* The benefits of this study could enable improved treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain with the closed loop system and cervical lead placement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Syndrome Multi Focal Pain Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome Polyneuropathies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single arm

Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.

cervical lead placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

implant of cervical lead neurostimulation, using saluda medical devices

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cervical lead placement

implant of cervical lead neurostimulation, using saluda medical devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trail and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.
* Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
* Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
* Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saluda Medical Pty Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rijnstate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan Willem Kallewaard phd

MD PhD dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16095934 (View on PubMed)

Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3 Suppl Spine):254-67. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.3.0254.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15029914 (View on PubMed)

Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R; Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25112889 (View on PubMed)

Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15109517 (View on PubMed)

Surges G, Paulus J, Blass T, Mendryscha K, Bettag M, Rotte A. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1255-1268. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34236671 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-2201 - Cervical lead

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.