Assessment of Effectiveness and Stimulation Coverage of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy in Patients with Cervical Lead Placement
NCT ID: NCT06359561
Last Updated: 2024-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-05
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neuronal Activation Accuracy in Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT06775535
Clinical Utility of Neurophysiological Measurements of ECAP-controlled Closed-loop SCS to Guide Treatment of Chronic Pain
NCT06229470
Study to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Utility of an All-in-one Procedure With an At-home Screening Trial
NCT06996574
Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT05885061
Prospective Validation Study of an E-health Tool for Patient Selection for SCS
NCT06853795
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Device used in the study The Saluda Medical EvokeTM Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulator (CL-SCS) System (Evoke System). The CE marked Evoke System will be used within its licensed use and manuals. The Evoke System measures and records spinal cord (SC) activation resulting from stimulation via evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). The Evoke System can be programmed to provide ECAP-controlled, closed-loop SCS or open-loop, fixed-output (traditional) SCS; ECAPs may be measured and recorded in either stimulation mode.
Indication for use The Evoke SCS System is indicated as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs and will be used within its licensed indication during this study.
Rational This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.
Study design An observational, prospective, multi-center, single-arm study. Study population Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.
Objectives
* Evaluate stimulation coverage in pain area and other parts of the body, sensation (awareness and quality) and pain relief using a 0-10 numeric rating score (NRS) in patient implanted with one or two leads at cervical level receiving closed-loop spinal cord stimulator (CL-SCS) therapy.
* Assessment of holistic outcomes: measure quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) assessed by the PROMIS-29 questionnaire.
* Evaluate medication intake, patient satisfaction and patient global impression of change (PGIC).
* Assessment of device data and programming parameters.
* Neurophysiological measurements: neuronal activation, conduction velocity and posture change assessment.
Inclusion criteria
* Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trail and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.
* Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
* Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
* Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent. Exclusion criteria
* Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.
Burden and Risk
* There will be no additional burden associated with participation in the study. The data will be collected during the standard of care visits. Data collection required by the study protocol will add no additional time to standard clinical appointments, as the data will be downloaded from the clinical interface or entered directly into the database.
* The benefits of this study could enable improved treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain with the closed loop system and cervical lead placement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
single arm
Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.
cervical lead placement
implant of cervical lead neurostimulation, using saluda medical devices
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cervical lead placement
implant of cervical lead neurostimulation, using saluda medical devices
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
* Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
* Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
* Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
INDUSTRY
Rijnstate Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jan Willem Kallewaard phd
MD PhD dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3 Suppl Spine):254-67. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.3.0254.
Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R; Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208.
Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.016.
Surges G, Paulus J, Blass T, Mendryscha K, Bettag M, Rotte A. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1255-1268. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-2201 - Cervical lead
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.