EVOKE ECAP-Controlled Lead Placement and Programming in Chronic Pain Patients
NCT ID: NCT05704751
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-27
2026-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Effectiveness, Safety, and Performance of the Evoke Closed-Loop SCS System to Treat Patients With Chronic Pain of the Trunk and/or Limbs
NCT04627974
Novel Treatment Delivery of ECAP-controlled Closed-loop SCS for Chronic Pain
NCT04662905
Clinical Utility of Neurophysiological Measurements of ECAP-controlled Closed-loop SCS to Guide Treatment of Chronic Pain
NCT06229470
Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Manual vs. Automatic Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation With Surgical Leads
NCT01874899
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Neuropathic Pain of Back or Lower Extremity
NCT00399841
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conventional open-loop SCS devices produce paraesthesia (a tingling sensation) that overlap the pain distribution, with the intent of masking pain perception. It is thought that conventional open-loop SCS success depends on adequacy and durability of paraesthesia coverage as well as patient tolerance of the induced sensations. For the last 40 years, the primary focus of innovation for SCS for chronic pain has been to improve the reliability of overlapping paraesthesia's with distribution of pain. Achieving adequate and stable paraesthesia coverage in the chronic pain region is known to be challenging, making back pain more difficult to treat and limiting application mostly to patients with predominant leg pain. Therefore, the use of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain (especially back) shows mixed results. Declining efficacy over time has been observed in studies using low-frequency SCS programming.
Programming in the EVOKE Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) study was performed using objective, neurophysiological feedback i.e., ECAPs for the first time since the advent of SCS to program both the control (open-loop) and test (closed-loop) chronic low back and/or leg pain patients. The trial has shown the superior long-term efficacy and durability of closed-loop SCS in treatment of chronic back and leg pain. Unpublished data collected during the study showed that objective EVOKE ECAP-based programming does not require paraesthesia overlap with pain distribution to achieve successful outcomes in low back (axial or radicular) and leg pain patients. Evaluation of data demonstrated that at 12-months follow-up (EVOKE study), 27% of subjects did not report paraesthesia in the low back region and reported 82% and 72% back pain relief with closed-loop and open-loop SCS, respectively. This is compared to 75% and 69% pain relief, respectively, in subjects who reported paraesthesia. Therefore, no interaction between the treatment effect and paraesthesia (p = 0.775) exist (EVOKE study).
The secondary objective of this observational study is to evaluate the overlap of the dermatomal pain map with the paraesthesia coverage provided by ECAP-based programming by asking the patient to report how much percentage of the primary pain area is covered by paraesthesia.
Additionally, the patients will be followed-up for 12-months and treatment outcomes (Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes (PROMIS 29+2 Profile v2.1, VAS, long-term responders in terms of pain relief, subject satisfaction with asleep lead placement, stimulation programming characteristics, neurophysiological characteristics) will be captured pre-treatment at baseline, at 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-activation and initial programming of the closed-loop Stimulator (CLS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
spinal cord stimulation
EVOKE ECAP-Controlled Lead Placement and Programming in Chronic Pain Patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Symptoms of chronic predominant back pain for at least 6-months, with a minimum pain intensity of 5/10 in the primary pain area on VAS pain intensity questionnaire.
3. Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician.
4. Be capable of subjective evaluation, able to read and understand English-written questionnaires, and able to read, understand and sign the written inform consent in English.
5. Be willing and capable of giving informed consent.
6. Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2\. Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention, and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcomes.
3\. Subjects with chronic alcohol abuse or currently in rehabilitation. 4. Be benefitting within from an interventional procedure and/or surgery to treat chronic pain (Subjects should be enrolled at least 30 days from last benefit).
5\. Have prior experience with SCS. 6. Have an existing drug pump and/or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker.
7\. Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of diathermy.
8\. Have an active systemic or local infection at the anticipated needle entry site.
9\. Be pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal).
10\. Are currently nursing (if female).
11\. Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
322831
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.