Validity and Reliability of Trunk Strength Device

NCT ID: NCT06330129

Last Updated: 2025-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-15

Study Completion Date

2025-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of assessing trunk muscle strength using an isometric device (Pegasus, Leipzig, Germany). Thirty healthy volunteers will undergo maximal isometric strength testing with the device, repeated one week later to assess repeatability. Surface electrodes will measure muscle activation, while MRI scans will assess structural condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is to assess the validity and repeatability of trunk muscle strength evaluation using an isometric device (Pegasus, Leipzig, Germany) and to investigate it. Thirty healthy volunteer participants will undergo testing of maximal isometric (non-moving) strength using this device. The same strength measurement procedure will be repeated one week later for all participants to determine if the measurements are repeatable, i.e., if the device is capable of providing similar strength data in two closely timed measurements. To assess whether the device actually provides reliable strength data for the trunk muscles, surface electrodes will be additionally placed on the involved muscles to understand the extent of neural activation of these muscles during the test. Additionally, an MRI examination will be conducted for all study participants to assess the structural condition of the trunk muscles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trunk Muscle Strength

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy subjects

30 healthy subjects undergo trunk muscle strength assessement using the Pegasus device, with repeated measurements to evaluate repeatability and correlation with both surface electromyography (EMG) and MRI scans of trunk muscles.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CTT Pegasus

Intervention Type DEVICE

The intervention aims to assess the construct validity of trunk flexor, extensor, and rotator muscle strength using the CTT PEGASUS isometric dynamometer (Leipzig, Germany). This involves correlating muscle strength measured isometrically with its physiological determinants: MRI-based anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) in the lumbar region and muscle activation measured via surface electromyography (EMG) of spine and trunk muscles. Additionally, the intervention will assess the test-retest reliability of isometric strength of trunk flexors, extensors, and rotators.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CTT Pegasus

The intervention aims to assess the construct validity of trunk flexor, extensor, and rotator muscle strength using the CTT PEGASUS isometric dynamometer (Leipzig, Germany). This involves correlating muscle strength measured isometrically with its physiological determinants: MRI-based anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) in the lumbar region and muscle activation measured via surface electromyography (EMG) of spine and trunk muscles. Additionally, the intervention will assess the test-retest reliability of isometric strength of trunk flexors, extensors, and rotators.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* both male and female subjects
* age between 18 and 59 years
* BMI \< 30 kg/m2
* cognitively intact (self-reported)
* autonomous walking

Exclusion Criteria

* age under 18 years or over 60 years
* any prior spinal surgery or other musculoskeletal surgery having an impact on movement
* acute or chronic back pain in the last 6 months(self-reported)
* pregnancy (self-reported)
* inability to perform the planned set of activities included in the study (e.g. maximal voluntary contraction torque test)
* inability to give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Balgrist Campus AG

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Schulthess Klinik

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jacopo Vitale

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schulthess Klinik

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pegasus01_Val

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.