Comparison of the Efficacy of Telerehabilitation and In-person Rehabilitation Based on Wearable Devices After ACLR Surgery: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT06327555

Last Updated: 2025-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-30

Study Completion Date

2025-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.

Subjects: 164 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent ACLR. Design: A mixed-block randomization method was used to randomly assign participants to two groups: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group, with a 50% probability of assignment to each group. All participants received standard postoperative rehabilitation training with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received therapist-administered treatment with three rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).

Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, and isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.

Subjects: Participants: This study recruited 164 participants (aged ≥18 years) undergoing ACLRsurgery;

Inclusion criteria:

(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments; Exclusion Criteria: (1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.

Protocol: Participants were randomly assigned to two groups using a mixed-block randomization method: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group. The allocation probability for both groups was 50%. All participants received routine outpatient diagnosis and treatment. Postoperative rehabilitation training used a standardized postoperative rehabilitation training protocol with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received three face-to-face rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).

Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint, and muscle strength symmetry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

in-person rehabilitation group

The in-person rehabilitation group takes a face-to-face approach, with therapists providing outpatient rehabilitation instruction twice a week for six weeks.

Group Type OTHER

in-person rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

The in-person rehabilitation group uses a face-to-face approach, with therapists providing outpatient rehabilitation guidance to patients three times a week for six weeks. After that, patients exercise at home according to the rehabilitation manual.

telerehabilitation group

The telerehabilitation group uses software and sensors to provide remote postoperative rehabilitation guidance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

telerehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

The telerehabilitation group uses smart wearables and mobile apps worn around the knee joint to perform telerehabilitation at home. Both sets of training sessions are identical.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

telerehabilitation

The telerehabilitation group uses smart wearables and mobile apps worn around the knee joint to perform telerehabilitation at home. Both sets of training sessions are identical.

Intervention Type OTHER

in-person rehabilitation

The in-person rehabilitation group uses a face-to-face approach, with therapists providing outpatient rehabilitation guidance to patients three times a week for six weeks. After that, patients exercise at home according to the rehabilitation manual.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments;

Exclusion Criteria

(1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University First Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

quan J Wang, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Peking University Third Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

quan Jian Wang

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M2023132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Return to Activity After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07006545 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION