Does the Pain Experienced During Orthodontic Treatment and Bracket Removal Depend on the Architecture of the Bracket?

NCT ID: NCT06324162

Last Updated: 2024-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present research aimed to thoroughly investigate the impact of bracket architecture on pain perception during active treatment, debonding, and adhesive removal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

100 consecutive patients who completed treatment with one of two bracket systems (2-slot brackets with integral base or conventional twin brackets with foil mesh) were included in this prospective clinical trial. Prior to the removal of brackets, participants were asked to evaluate the level of pain encountered throughout their orthodontic treatment with the fixed appliances, utilizing a 0-10 numerical rating scale, and to indicate the main cause of pain. Subsequently, brackets on the right side of both dental arches were debonded using the lift-off debonding instrument (LODI), while on the left side, the bracket removal pliers (BRP). The residual adhesive was removed through two methods (manual in the upper arch and rotary in the lower). The same scale was employed to assess pain levels during brackets and adhesive removal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Debonding Orthodontic Brackets

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2-slot brackets

50 patients treated with 2-slot brackets.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bracket removal pliers, LODI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Brackets on the right side of both dental arches were debonded using the lift-off debonding instrument (LODI), while on the left side, the bracket removal pliers (BRP). The residual adhesive was removed through two methods (manual in the upper arch and rotary in the lower). The same scale was employed to assess pain levels during brackets and adhesive removal.

Twin brackets

50 patients treated with traditional twin brackets.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bracket removal pliers, LODI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Brackets on the right side of both dental arches were debonded using the lift-off debonding instrument (LODI), while on the left side, the bracket removal pliers (BRP). The residual adhesive was removed through two methods (manual in the upper arch and rotary in the lower). The same scale was employed to assess pain levels during brackets and adhesive removal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bracket removal pliers, LODI

Brackets on the right side of both dental arches were debonded using the lift-off debonding instrument (LODI), while on the left side, the bracket removal pliers (BRP). The residual adhesive was removed through two methods (manual in the upper arch and rotary in the lower). The same scale was employed to assess pain levels during brackets and adhesive removal.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

adhesive removal pliers, tungsten bur

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* fixed appliance in both dental arches
* brackets bonded using the Transbond XT adhesive system (3M Unitek, St. Paul, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* periodontal disease
* restorations or caries on buccal surfaces of the teeth,
* consumption of analgesics within eight hours preceding the debonding appointment
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Piotr Fudalej

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Piotr Fudalej

Prof. dr hab.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piotr Fudalej, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Orthodontics, Jagiellonian University Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gibas-Stanek M, Fudalej P. Does the pain experienced during orthodontic treatment and bracket removal depend on the architecture of the bracket or debonding method? Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 4;47(1):cjae073. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae073.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39665482 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JagiellonianU Gibas-Stanek

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.