Home Grip Assistance Glove on the Use of the Upper Limb and Compliance Factors in Brain-injured Adults
NCT ID: NCT06312631
Last Updated: 2024-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-26
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Interventions in the chronic phase of stroke aim to return home. The integration of the paretic upper limb into daily life activities is a major issue regarding the prognosis of recovery of use of the upper limb. Independence in daily life becomes an ultimate goal to take charge of.
This study focuses on a new technical aid device, standard orthosis type, expanding the range of gripping gloves: the SaeboGlove in everyday environments. These MS orthoses help improve the use and function of the MSP in post-stroke adults as well as their independence and participation in society.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tele-rehabilitation in the Home With Gaming as a Method of Improving Upper Extremity Function After Stroke
NCT02494362
A Low Cost Virtual Reality System for Home Based Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Following Stroke
NCT02637791
Therapy to Improve Reaching Movement in Upper Limb
NCT03508037
Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Using Game Rehabilitation System With Functional Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Patients
NCT02772510
BCI Post-stroke Neurorehabilitation
NCT02404857
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Task handover model #1
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 1st model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = AB; Visit T2 = AB; Visit T3 = AB
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #2
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 2nd model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = BA ; Visit T2 = AB ; Visit T3 = AB
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #3
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 3rd model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = AB ; Visit T2 = BA ; Visit T3 = AB
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #4
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 4th model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = AB ; Visit T2 = AB ; Visit T3 = BA
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #5
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 5th model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = BA ; Visit T2 = BA ; Visit T3 = AB
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #6
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 6th model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = BA ; Visit T2 = AB ; Visit T3 = BA
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #7
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 7th model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = AB ; Visit T2 = BA ; Visit T3 = BA
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Task handover model #8
At each visit, the patient will perform the tasks with the gripping glove (A) or without the gripping glove (B).
The order of administration "with then without the glove (AB)" or "without then with the glove (BA)" is drawn at random for each patient.
The 8th model follows the following diagram:
Visit T1 = BA ; Visit T2 = BA ; Visit T3 = BA
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Putting on the gripping glove
taking measurements and putting the gripping glove on the patient
ULPA questionnaire
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the gripping glove on the performance of the upper limb in daily life will be evaluated using the ULPA score.
The investigator asks the patient to perform a task and the ULPA collects the total number of errors made by the patient (inability/omission, imprecision, repetition, time to complete the task)
Motor Activity Log (MAL) Questionnaire
The MAL is a self-assessment of the integration of the upper limb into daily life. This measurement allows a quantified evaluation of the perceived performance of the use of the upper limb in the actions of daily life.
The patient will answer 30 questions about daily life and for each item, rate the quantity from 0 to 5: 0 = never uses the hemiplegic arm and 5 = uses as much as before the accident
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum).
Score Action Arm Research Test
This questionnaire evaluates 4 different actions: Grasping an object (6 different objects to grasp), holding an object (4 different objects), pinching an object (6 different objects) and the overall movements made by the patient (3 different overall movements).
For each item, each object or each movement evaluated, the patient must rate the task on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=cannot perform any part of the test and 3=performs the test normally)
EuroQol five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of health. 5 items are proposed (mobility, autonomy, current activity, pain, anxiety) and for each the patient must check one of the 5 propositions (no problem, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems, incapable). The patient must also rate their state of health on a scale of 0 to 100.
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
This questionnaire assesses satisfaction with the technical aid (here the gripping glove) and the related services. The technique and related services will be evaluated by items provided to the patient and he will have to rate for each of them a score between 1 and 5 (1 = not satisfied at all and 5 = very satisfied)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
This questionnaire measures the effect of technical aids on the psychosocial level. 26 sentences or words are offered to the patient concerning his psychological state and the patient must evaluate them between -3 and 3 (-3 = decreased and +3: increased)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Carrying out an activity in the patient's real context is assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The doctor gives the patient objectives to achieve and the patient must give the quotation for each objective between initial state (-2), expected result (0) and best possible result (2)
installation and collection of accelerometers
The accelerometer quantitatively reports the spontaneous use of the upper limb in daily life. It counts the number of voluntary movements of the upper limbs. The amount of movement of the paretic upper limb will be expressed as a percentage of the movements of the non-paretic limb.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who suffered a stroke more than three months ago;
* Patient unable to actively extend long fingers (hand opening) to voluntarily grasp an empty glass (upper and lower diameter of 7 and 6 cm respectively, height of 12 to 15 cm, weight of 125g, identical to equipment used for ARAT), with a palmar grip (cylindrical grip), while the subject can hold the previously placed glass passively in the hand;
* Patient capable of passively opening the hand sufficient to grasp the glass when the gripping glove is put on, with the possibility of actively closing the hand;
* Patient with the ability to put on and remove the SaeboGlove® gripping glove with the help of a third person if necessary and/or available.
* Patient with a smartphone, tablet and/or computer compatible with video taking and teleconsultation.
* Free, informed and signed consent by the participant and/or the person having guardianship and the investigator (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research);
* Person affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security system.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with moderate or severe muscular spasticity of the wrist flexors and the long and short flexors of the fingers and thumb (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥ 3);
* Patient with limited active elbow extension, not allowing the ipsilateral knee to be reached with the hand, the subject being seated with the trunk vertical (approach limitation);
* Patient with an active anterior shoulder elevation range of less than 15°;
* Patient with other upper limb deficiencies likely to influence participation;
* Patient and/or entourage who do not have access to teleconsultation, and/or can be reached remotely;
* Patient with severe aphasia, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) ≤ 3;
* Presence of moderate or severe edema localized to the wrist and hand;
* Patient allergic to Latex
* History of upper limb surgery less than 6 months old.
* Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women
* Patient deprived of liberty (detained/incarcerated);
* Patient under judicial protection
* Impossibility of giving the person informed information and ensuring the subject's compliance due to impaired physical and/or psychological health
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claire VILLEPINTE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Claire VILLEPINTE
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Claire VILLEPINTE, MD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC31/21/0342
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.