The Impact of Using Different Spinal Needle Sizes on the Efficacy of the Dural Puncture Epidural Block

NCT ID: NCT06287047

Last Updated: 2025-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the dural puncture epidural technique (DPET) with either 25-gauge spinal needle or 27-gauge spinal needle versus conventional epidural technique and evaluate whether DPET improves onset and spread of labor analgesia and if there is a role of the usage of different sized needles as regards block efficiency and complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* 81 patients primigravida parturients (ASA II) in active labor
* uncomplicated pregnancy
* Cephalic presentation
* Cervical dilatation \<5 cm

Exclusion criteria:

* Allergy to local anesthetics.
* Bleeding disorders
* Low platelet count
* Local or systemic sepsis
* Prior surgery in lumbosacral spine
* Patient's refusal.

Eighty-one patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three equal groups:

Group CE (n=27): Conventional epidural. Group DPE-25 (n=27): Dural puncture epidural with 25-gauge spinal needle. Group DPE-27 (n=27): Dural puncture epidural with 27-gauge spinal needle.

Randomization was done by computer generated numbers and concealed by serially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes. The details of the series were unknown to the investigators and the group assignment was kept in a set of sealed envelopes, each bearing only the case number on the outside.

Full medical and surgical history were taken. Laboratory investigations were revised. Visual analogue scale was educated to the patient before the start of the operation.

One liter of lactated Ringer's solution was infused IV over 15 min during the neuraxial procedure.

The procedure was performed in the seated position. Parturients with VAS \< 5 were excluded.

The procedure was performed by a senior anesthesia resident.

Before administering medications through the epidural catheter, subarachnoid, intravascular and subdural placement had to be ruled out.

After 5 min of the first initial bolus dose, adequacy of analgesia was assessed.

Analgesia was considered adequate if VAS score is ≤3. Onset of analgesia was defined as from time of first bolus dose to time of achieving VAS ≤3.

Patient with VAS score \>3; considered failed block and were excluded from the study.

Analgesia was evaluated by a blinded observer assessing visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, onset of analgesia, sensory level, and motor blockade.

The primary outcome was the onset of analgesia (defined as duration from injection of the first initial epidural bolus to attainment of VAS \<3).

Other data collected are:

1. Patients' demographic data.
2. Obstetrics data.
3. Onset of analgesia (attainment of VAS \<3).
4. HR and MABP (baseline, every 5 minutes until 15 mins, a every 15 mins till 1 hour and then every 1 hour till delivery).
5. Visual analogue scale (VAS) with hemodynamics.
6. Assessment of sensory level after 30 mins of the block.
7. Assessment of Sacral block during the 1st 30 minutes.
8. Assessment of motor block through the modified bromage scale
9. Occurrence of side effects as: Hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting and pruritis ,PDPH, nerve injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

81 patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into three equal groups: Group A (n=27): Conventional epidural. Group B (n=27): Dural puncture epidural with 25-gauge spinal needle. Group C (n=27): Dural puncture epidural with 27-gauge spinal needle.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The details of the series will be unknown to the investigators and the group assignment will be kept in asset of sealed envelopes each bearing only the case number on the outside. Prior to surgery the appropriate numbered envelope will be opened by the nurse, the card inside will determine the patient group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional epidural group

Conventional epidural.

.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epidural analgesia alone or with dural puncture with different sizes of spinal needles

DPE-25G group

Dural puncture epidural with 25-gauge spinal needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epidural analgesia alone or with dural puncture with different sizes of spinal needles

DPE-27G group

Dural puncture epidural with 27-gauge spinal needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epidural analgesia alone or with dural puncture with different sizes of spinal needles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epidural analgesia

Epidural analgesia alone or with dural puncture with different sizes of spinal needles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dural puncture

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASAI \& II parturient in active labor
* Uncomplicated pregnancy with vertex presentation
* Willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient's refusal
* Coagulopathy (INR\> 1.5 and platelets \< 80,000)
* Allergy to local anesthetics.
* Prior surgery in lumbosacral spine.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Reham Mahrous

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medidcne, Cairo Univerisity

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

spinal needle sizes and DPE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
NCT06074471 RECRUITING NA