Cervical Epidural Versus Cevical Facet Injection for Patients With Chronic Cervical Pain

NCT ID: NCT04594876

Last Updated: 2023-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After approval of the institutional review board and the Ethics Committee of Al Fayoum University number (D228) , and written informed consent from all patientá¹£ Pilot study will be done to confirm this sample size .The patients are classified in two groups group P for cervical epidural and group F for facet injection To compare effectivness of cervical epidural versus cervical facet injection under fluroscopic guidance in patients sufferring from chronic neck pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After the approval of the institutional review board and the Ethics Committee of Al Fayoum University number (D228) , and written informed consent from all patientá¹£ Pilot study will be done to confirm this sample size .The patients are classified in two groups group P for cervical epidural and group F for facet injection. Patients Inclusion criteria of chronic cervical pain syndromes will be made from their history, symptoms, and imaging diagnosis. Patients will be lying down on the prone position. In group( F) Under the C-arm fluoroscopic guidance targeted zygapophyseal joints will be identified. The mixture of 2 mL of 2% lidocaine with 2 ml of beta methasone (6 mg/ml) will be injected in the joints unilaterally or bilaterally according to complaints of patients. Another group ( P) patients will undergo translaminar or interspinous cervical epidural block (CEBs). The translaminar or interlaminar approach is considered the safest and most effective technique for cervical epidural placement.The patient will be in a prone position. This procedure will be performed with fluoroscopic guidance. The patient will be placed in an optimal flexed cervical spine posture stabilized with enough resistance to prevent movement of the head during the procedure. The skin will be prepared with an antiseptic solution. The midline of the selected interspace will be identified under fluroscopic guidance. LA, such as lidocaine, will be used, to mark the intended site of skin entry. As much as 1 mL of lidocaine will be used to infiltrate the skin and subcutaneous tissues. We will insert a 25-gauge, 2-inch needle exactly into the targeted midline. After the LA has been given time to anesthetize the area,we will hold the needle firmly at the hub with the left thumb and index finger. Then the palm of the left hand will be placed firmly against the patient's neck, so that the left hand acts as a unit to stabilize, protect, and control the needle's trajectory and its metered ingress from any unexpected patient activity. The needle will be then advanced with the left hand, which is braced against the neck with the needle hub held tightly between the left thumb and forefinger. We will use the right hand to monitor resistance through a syringe containing air. With constant pressure applied to the plunger of the syringe through light pressure applied by the right thumb, the needle and syringe will be advanced in a slow and deliberate manner. As the bevel passes through the ligament flavum and enters the epidural space, a sudden loss of resistance that we will appreciate also we can appreciate the entrence the epidural space under fluroscopic guidance in condition that not to cross J line (a line appear under flouroscopy imaging facet joint articulation if crossing this line we will puncture the dura).

Needle position within the epidural space will be checked by using fluoroscopic verification and by repeating the loss of resistance maneuver. The cervical epidural space should accept 0.5-1 mL of air or sterile preservative free saline without significant resistance. The force required to depress the plunger should not exceed that which is necessary to overcome the resistance of the needle. Any significant pain or sudden increase in resistance during the injection suggests incorrect needle placement, so the injection will be stopped and we will assess the position of the needle using fluoroscopy. If the needle remains satisfactorily placed and loss of resistance within the epidural space is confirmed without additional patient report of pain, gentle aspiration will be checked to assure that the needle is not positioned in the subarachnoid space or that it's not intravascular. If cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is aspirated, we will repeat the block attempt at a different interspace. If aspiration of blood occurs, the needle will be tightly rotated and the aspiration test will be repeated. If the aspiration of blood continues, the procedure will be aborted due to the danger of developing an epidural hematoma and possibly neurological compromise. when the needle is correctly placed in the midline of the epidural space, then injection of the mixture of 2 mL of 2% lidocaine with 2 ml of beta methasone (6 mg/ml) will be done .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervention Cervical Epidural Injection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Group P will receive cervical epidural Group F will receive cervical facet injection Both under fluroscopic guidance
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The patients were randomly allocated by a computer-generated table into one of two study groups. The randomization sequence was concealed in opaque sealed envelopes. The envelopes were opened by the study investigators just after recruitments and admission to the operation room. Only assessors and data collectors were blinded to the group's allocations

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Flouroscopic guidance Cervical Epidural injection

Group (P) flouroscopic guidance cervical epidural injection

Group Type OTHER

Flouroscopic guidance cervical epidural versus cervical facet injection

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients are classified in two groups group P for cervical epidural and group F for facet injection. The skin will be prepared with an antiseptic solution. The midline of the selected interspace will be identified under fluroscopic guidance.

Flouroscopic guidance cervical facet injection

Group (F) Flouroscopic guidance cervical facet injection

Group Type OTHER

Flouroscopic guidance cervical epidural versus cervical facet injection

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients are classified in two groups group P for cervical epidural and group F for facet injection. The skin will be prepared with an antiseptic solution. The midline of the selected interspace will be identified under fluroscopic guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flouroscopic guidance cervical epidural versus cervical facet injection

The patients are classified in two groups group P for cervical epidural and group F for facet injection. The skin will be prepared with an antiseptic solution. The midline of the selected interspace will be identified under fluroscopic guidance.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age between 20 - 70 years old.
* ASA I and II
* Cervical pain at least 3 months before procedure
* Patients have failed pharmacological treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic infection
* Skin infection
* Bleeding tendency and coagulopathy
* Pregnancy
* Neurological disorders
* Any deformaties that disfacilate the procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fayoum University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Atef Mohamed Sayed mahmoud

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Atef Mahmoud

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fayoum University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Atef Mohamed mahmoud

Al Fayyum, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D228

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D228

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.