Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-01
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
NAPS: Non-awake Versus Awake Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulators
NCT02284542
Real-Time Monitoring of the Injection Pressure During the Peripheral Nerve Block
NCT07302997
Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Disorders.
NCT07288411
Effect of Transauricular Vagal Stimulation on Cardiac Function After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07007884
Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (aVNS) in Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
NCT06588608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Qualified subjects will be identified and contacted by the anesthesia team prior to their clinical evaluation for labor neuraxial analgesia. Potential patients will be informed of the study, and if study individuals choose to participate and an informed consent form will be signed prior to any study related activities.
When study participants request labor analgesia, investigators will incorporate routine care delivery flow for patients receiving ultrasound guided neuraxial anesthesia.
The clinician will apply ultrasound gel to the Accuro 3S probe (gel inside the probe need not be sterile), and then cover the probe in a sterile probe cover. Sterile ultrasound gel will then be applied to the patient's skin on the back to enable imaging. The Accuro 3S probe will be applied to the patient's spinal region and the clinician will perform scouting scans. Image recordings can be captured by depressing a button located on the probe handle. While performing the scouting scans, the provider will take several image recordings of the spine. The image recordings will include two levels, finding the space, and then at each level plus a spinous process, scanning left and right at each of these points.
The clinician will then administer local anesthetic prior to needle procedures. After needle insertion point and trajectory is established on the ultrasound image, the epidural or spinal needle will then be advanced by the clinician based on their standard technique. While advancing the needle the provider will collect a series of image recordings.
After proper placement of needle/catheter, the Accuro 3S device will then be removed from the patient and they will proceed with standard clinical protocol for post placement care.
Accuro 3S: Primary data collected during this study will be images recordings captured during the scouting and needle placement for the epidural procedure. Images will be acquired directly on the 3S and will not contain patient identifiers.
After collection of data up to 100 patients, Investigators will be moving to clinical analysis.
Rivanna is the sponsor and will be funding this research. The de-identified patient data that Rivanna will receive for analysis include: results of demographic information (e.g. age, height, weight, sex, race, and ethnicity). Obstetric details including gravity, parity, gestational age, labor or cesarean delivery, pain score prior to and after placement. Accuro 3S Images (including scouting images of spine and images of needle placement). Insertion: Number of needle passes and redirects, interspace attempted/inserted; epidural or spinal, and needle gauges used. Number, type, and details of any complication (e.g. wet tap). Failed spinal or epidural including: pain \>3/10 after labor epidural, catheter replacement, no or one-sided sensory block, failure to provide cesarean anesthesia, conversion to different type of anesthesia.
Patients will undergo their standard medical and obstetric treatment at the discretion of the obstetrical and anesthesia team. There will be no delay in their treatment due to this study, and the device data will not be available of influence care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intrathecal neuraxial procedure
Participants undergoing surgery, receiving neuraxial intrathecal anesthesia with block placement in part by the investigational device.
Ultrasound placement device
Device to assist in placement of epidural procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound placement device
Device to assist in placement of epidural procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is eligible for placement of neuraxial anesthesia, and the patient has agreed to the procedure.
* Patient skin is intact in the area of placement of the epidural or spinal anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of orthopedic implants in the spine.
* Skin dyscrasias or allergies to the ultrasound procedure.
* Unable to assume sitting position.
* Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 20 kg/m2.
* Known allergies to ultrasound gel.
* Known history of allergic reactions to adhesives used in standard epidural placement
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rivanna Medical, Inc.
UNKNOWN
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Clemens Ortner
Clinical Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clemens Ortner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, Estebe JP, Fuzier R, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Traskaite V, Macas A, Breschan C, Vailati D, Subert M. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):219-250. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383.
Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.
Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Rajagopalan S, Shah K, Guffey D, Tran C, Suresh M, Wali A. Predictors of difficult epidural placement in pregnant women: A trainees' perspective. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):548-552. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_340_18.
Ismail S, Raza A, Munshi K, Tabassum R. Failure rate of labor epidural: An observational study among different levels of trainee anesthesiologists in a university hospital of a developing country. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):210-215. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_39_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Cittadini G, Martinoli C. [Ultrasound and the bone: a difficult relationship]. Radiol Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;89(1-2):12-7. Italian.
Mao Q, He H, Lu Y, Hu Y, Wang Z, Gan M, Yan H, Chen L. Ultrasound probe tilt impedes the needle-beam alignment during the ultrasound-guided procedures. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81354-w.
Tiouririne M, Dixon AJ, Mauldin FW Jr, Scalzo D, Krishnaraj A. Imaging Performance of a Handheld Ultrasound System With Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Lumbar Spine Anatomy: A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol. 2017 Aug;52(8):447-455. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000361.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
73172
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.