Exercise Capacity Improvement by Conduction System Pacing in heArt Failure patieNts Without Compelling CRT inDication

NCT ID: NCT06278844

Last Updated: 2024-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-12

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the impact of conduction system pacing in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing on exercise capacity, as measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), in heart failure patients with indication for pacing but no compelling indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure patients influenced by conduction system pacing will be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart failure (HF) is a serious condition that affects a lot of people and places a significant burden on the healthcare system. Some HF patients also have issues with the natural electrical system of their heart, causing uneven heart contractions and worsening heart function. A treatment known as CRT has been helping such patients, but it does not work for everyone. A new technique called conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged that might offer a more natural way of maintaining heart contractions.

This study aims to determine if CSP can enhance the ability of HF patients to exercise, by looking at their maximum oxygen consumption (a measure of exercise capacity). It will also explore why some HF patients struggle with exercise more than others. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the new CSP treatment or a standard pacing method (right ventricular apical pacing). Patients will be checked regularly over a follow-up period of 24 weeks.

The main goal is to see if patients can exercise better with CSP after 24 weeks. The study will also look at other heart measures and safety concerns related to the devices. This study might show that CSP can help improve exercise capacity and heart function in certain HF patients. The results could guide health care professionals in offering better, tailored treatments for their patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Conduction Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conduction system pacing

In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conduction system pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing. In the usual care group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricle apex as usual.

Right ventricular apical pacing

Control group, in this group patients will receive a pacemaker with the ventricular lead in the right ventricle apex.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Right ventricular apical pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

This is the usual care group. Patients will receive a pacemaker device with the right ventricular lead inserted in the apex and not in the septal position.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conduction system pacing

In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing. In the usual care group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricle apex as usual.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Right ventricular apical pacing

This is the usual care group. Patients will receive a pacemaker device with the right ventricular lead inserted in the apex and not in the septal position.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with heart failure as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines

* Signs and/or symptoms of heart failure
* AND LVEF \<50% OR LVEF ≥50% and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction/raised filling pressures
* AND indication for cardiac pacing as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 18 years old
* Pregnancy
* Inability to provide consent or to undergo follow-up
* Class 1A indication for classical CRT as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Patients with a class 2A or higher indication for CRT can be included. However, patients with Class 1A indication for classical CRT but failure or suboptimal result of CS lead placement can be included.
* Significant cardiac or extracardiac comorbidity precluding maximal exercise testing, examples: Recent (\<4 weeks) decompensation of heart failure, angina pectoris class ≥2 , uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia , severe valvular heart disease, significant peripheral vascular disease, orthopaedic limitation ...
* Comorbidity that may influence 6-month prognosis, examples:

Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≤20 mL/kg/min or dialysis) , severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (≥GOLD 3) , active malignancy ...
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andreas Gevaert

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andreas Gevaert

Role: CONTACT

038213538

Faro Verelst

Role: CONTACT

038213538

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Faro Verelst

Role: primary

038213538

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.