Temporary Artery Clipping for Robotically-assisted Myomectomy, a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT06269809
Last Updated: 2025-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-04
2025-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ABSOLUTELY: A Temporary Uterine Blood Supply Occlusion for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Patients With UTErine LeiomYoma
NCT04519593
Temporary Clipping of the Uterine Arteries During Laparoscopic Myomectomy
NCT01530802
The Value of Uterine Artery Occlusion in Laparoscopic Myomectomy
NCT05994560
Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation in Decreasing Blood Loss in Trans-abdominal Myomectomy
NCT02643186
Incidence of Intrauterine Adhesions After Myomectomy With Intrauterine Anti-Adhesion Gel
NCT07280286
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, control of the bleeding during a myomectomy can be a challenge, even in the hands of an experienced robotic surgeon. Various strategies have been developed to combat this scenario; including rectal or IV misoprostol, intramyometrial injection of bupivacaine with epinephrine or vasopressin, , tranexaminic acid IV or various ligation strategies. There is moderate quality evidence for some of these interventions. Recently, the use of clips to temporary occlude the uterine artery for myomectomy with conventional laparoscopy for prevention of blood loss was validated in several studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials. To enhance hemostasis, recent articles described a technique to temporary clip both the uterine artery and infundibulopelvic artery with conventional laparoscopy, also resulting in fewer intra-operative bleeding compared to no artery clipping. The possible benefit of these ligation technique has never been studied in the setting of robotically-assisted myomectomies. On the one hand, RAM may involve more complex cases due to myoma size, localization or multiple myomas, and on the other hand, bleeding control may also be better with robotic surgery. This makes a prediction of the usefulness of this technique difficult, in terms of reducing blood loss.
Estimated blood loss remains a difficult outcome to reliably quantify, especially when using only visual parameters. During RAM, often only suction is used, making the estimation easier in comparison to open surgery, for which a variety of compresses and suction is used. This study will work with multiple primary endpoints, combining estimated blood loss over 500 mL, the need for a peri-operative blood transfusion or a hemoglobin drop exceeding 2 g/dL.
Other secondary outcomes will include complication rate, the operation time, postoperative pain and the need for additional hemostatic measures. In the literature, the risk of changes in ovarian reserve is also investigated, however it proved not significant and this was only a theoretical risk in the context of temporary clipping the infundibulopelvic artery, which is the main blood supply of the ovary. In this study, which will involve temporary clipping the utero-ovarian ligmant, there is no risk for a decrease in ovarian reserve.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Temporary artery clipping
Patients undergoing a robotically-assisted myomectomies, with temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments using laparoscopic clips/bulldog clamps, during robotically assisted myomectomy.
Control
Patients undergoing a robotically-assisted myomectomies, without temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
No temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
Robotically assisted myomectomy, for which no temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
Temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments using laparoscopic clips/bulldog clamps, during robotically assisted myomectomy.
No temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligmants.
Robotically assisted myomectomy, for which no temporary clipping of the uterine arteries and the utero-ovarian ligaments
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
2. Use of highly effective methods of birth control; defined as those that, alone or in combination, result in low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly; such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, true sexual abstinence (i.e. refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the Trial treatment(s)) or commitment to a vasectomised partner.
3. Female
4. Age: 18-50 years
5. Myomas, eligible for myomectomy, with the exclusion of FIGO 7-8 myomas.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any disorder, which in the Investigator's opinion might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol
2. Any prior or concomitant treatment(s) that might jeopardise the participant's safety or that would compromise the integrity of the Trial
3. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
4. Patient refusal to participate in the Trial
5. (Possible) malignancy
6. any contra indication for a laparoscopic or robotic surgery
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
OTHER
Bichat Hospital
OTHER
Rennes University Hospital
OTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wouter Froyman, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hopital Bichat
Paris, , France
Service de gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
Rennes, , France
Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Vincent Lavoué, MD, PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Williams VS, Jones G, Mauskopf J, Spalding J, DuChane J. Uterine fibroids: a review of health-related quality of life assessment. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):818-29. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.818.
Pritts, E. A., & Olive, D. L. (2012). When Should Uterine Fibroids Be Treated? Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-012-0010-y
Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Epub 2017 May 13.
Aendekerk, S., Verguts, J., Housmans, S., & Timmerman, D. (2019). Implementing robotic assisted myomectomy in surgical practice - a retrospective cohort study. Gynecological Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-019-1059-7
Herrinton LJ, Raine-Bennett T, Liu L, Alexeeff SE, Ramos W, Suh-Burgmann B. Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity. Perm J. 2020;24:19.035. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.035. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;2014(8):CD005355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5.
Ji L, Jin L, Hu M. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Myomas: Blood Loss and Recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):434-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Vercellino G, Erdemoglu E, Joe A, Hopfenmueller W, Holthaus B, Kohler C, Schneider A, Hasenbein K, Chiantera V. Laparoscopic temporary clipping of uterine artery during laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;286(5):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2419-y. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
Hiratsuka D, Isono W, Tsuchiya A, Okamura A, Fujimoto A, Nishii O. The effect of temporary uterine artery ligation on laparoscopic myomectomy to reduce intraoperative blood loss: A retrospective case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Aug 8;15:100162. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100162. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Kim HC, Song T. Temporary simultaneous two-arterial occlusion for reducing operative blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2114-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6482-8. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
Coll S, Feliu S, Montero C, Pellise-Tintore M, Tresserra F, Rodriguez I, Barri-Soldevila PN. Evolution of laparoscopic myomectomy and description of two hemostatic techniques in a large teaching gynecological center. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Rothermel LD, Lipman JM. Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):946-953. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
s67279
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.