the Effect of Minimally Invasive Technique Assisted by Magnetic Resonance Neurography

NCT ID: NCT06260839

Last Updated: 2024-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-16

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to to compare the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive surgery guided by magnetic resonance neurography(MRN) compared with non-magnetic resonance assisted minimally invasive surgery in patients with moderate to severe gluteal muscle contracture(GMC). The main question it aims to answer are: magnetic resonance neurography can better help optimize the surgical path of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture.

Participants will underwent preoperative magnetic resonance examination according to different groups, and then the experimental group designed individualized surgical approach and MRN-assisted minimally invasive release according to the imaging findings. In the control group, preoperative magnetic resonance examination was only used to assist in the diagnosis and evaluation of gluteal muscle contracture, and the magnetic resonance results were not used to assist in the design of surgical approach. In the control group, non-MRN-assisted minimally invasive release was performed. The researchers will compare the intraoperative surgery-related indicators and postoperative hip function scores and complications of patients in different groups to see if magnetic resonance-assisted surgery has a better postoperative effect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the different surgical intervention methods, the cases finally included in the study were divided into minimally invasive surgery group and MRN-guided minimally invasive surgery group according to the randomization method. It is expected that the number of cases finally included in the study in both groups will be 22 cases.

Firstly, the age and sex of the two groups of patients included in the study were recorded respectively, and the moderate and severe classification was carried out according to the Zhao \'s classification system. The experimental group and the control group were examined by pelvic X-ray, magnetic resonance and ultrasound before operation. After improving the relevant preoperative examination and excluding surgical contraindications, the intervention measures of the experimental group were to analyze the relationship between the shape of the contracture zone, the distance between the sciatic nerve and the contracture zone, and the external rotation angle according to the preoperative MRN manifestations of the patients, and to design the individualized surgical approach according to the imaging manifestations. MRN-assisted minimally invasive release ; in the control group, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was only used to assist in the diagnosis and evaluation of gluteal muscle contracture, and the results of magnetic resonance imaging were not used to assist in the design of surgical approach. In the control group, non-MRN-assisted minimally invasive release was performed. For patients, they all underwent magnetic resonance imaging before surgery, and all underwent minimally invasive surgery. However, the design process of the specific surgical approach is not clear, so it is a single-blind design for patients. All the operations were completed by two senior doctors of our research group. The data of postoperative follow-up were recorded, and the conclusion was drawn by statistical analysis.

Intraoperative research indicators include : incision length, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, first time to get out of bed, pain score, etc.

Postoperative follow-up study indicators included : subjective and objective functional rating scales ( hip flexion and adduction activity, leg squat, cross-leg test, Ober sign, pain in activity, claudication in walking ), patient appearance satisfaction, complications ( wound infection, fat liquefaction, neurovascular injury, incision hematoma formation, etc. ).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthopedic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRN guided minimally invasive surgery group

The intervention measures of the experimental group were to analyze the relationship between the shape of the contracture band, the distance between the sciatic nerve and the contracture band, and the external rotation angle according to the preoperative MRN manifestations of the patients, and to design the individualized surgical approach according to the imaging manifestations and perform MRN-assisted minimally invasive release.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

magnetic resonance neurography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

preoperative magnetic resonance neurography and assisted design of surgical approach

Minimally invasive surgery group

In the control group, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was only used to assist in the diagnosis and evaluation of gluteal muscle contracture, and the results of magnetic resonance imaging were not used to assist in the design of surgical approach. In the control group, non-MRN-assisted minimally invasive release was performed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

no magnetic resonance neurography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative magnetic resonance neurography was not performed, and general minimally invasive surgery was performed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

magnetic resonance neurography

preoperative magnetic resonance neurography and assisted design of surgical approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no magnetic resonance neurography

Preoperative magnetic resonance neurography was not performed, and general minimally invasive surgery was performed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(1). Meet the clinical and imaging diagnostic criteria of GMC ; (2).According to Zhao \'s classification system, patients with moderate to severe GMC diagnosed by medical history, symptoms and physical examination ; (3).Conservative treatment is ineffective for at least 6 months, and daily life is significantly affected ; (4).willing to be hospitalized and receive minimally invasive surgery ; (5). Can cooperate to complete the follow-up ; (6).Patients or immediate family members signed informed consent ; (7). Age 18-65 years old

Exclusion Criteria

1. . There is clinical or imaging evidence that there is or may be spinal or lower extremity neurological disease ;
2. . There is evidence of hip dysplasia or subluxation ;
3. .after evaluation of intolerance to surgical anesthesia ;
4. .coagulant dysfunction ;
5. . unable to complete the follow-up for various reasons ;
6. . Patients can not complete the scale assessment for other reasons
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

He Xiang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

He Xiang

The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medicial University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiang He, MS

Role: CONTACT

8684771013

Long Bi, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

8684771013

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xiang He, MS

Role: primary

8684771013

Long Bi, Prof.

Role: backup

8684771013

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liu GH, Cao FQ, Yang SH, Zhu JF. Factors influencing the treatment of severe gluteal muscle contracture in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2011 Mar;20(2):67-9. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328341bcb2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21127436 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20232442-F-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gluteal Activation Plus Movement Retraining
NCT07293039 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA