Muscle Strength Loss and Its Effect on Knee Cap Motion in Volunteers With Anterior Knee Pain

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

\- Researchers are interested in how the muscles affect the movement of the knee cap. These muscles may be related to different kinds of knee pain that are not caused by an injury or a disease. Imaging studies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to look at these muscles. To study these muscles and how they move, researchers will use MRI to look at healthy individuals and individuals with knee cap pain.

Objectives:

\- To study how changes to the muscles around the knee can influence knee pain.

Eligibility:

* Individuals between 18 to 55 years of age who have knee cap pain that cannot be explained by a specific injury or disease.
* Healthy volunteers between 18 and 55 years of age.

Design:

* Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history.
* This study requires two visits. Each visit will use standard MRI sequences to take images of the knee in motion and at rest.
* On the first visit, the MRI scan will look at the knee in its natural state. Participants will move the knee up and down for 1 to 3 minutes at a time during the scan.
* On the second visit, a local anesthetic agent will be injected into the muscle of the thigh. The anesthetic will block this muscle from generating force for 2 or 3 hours. Participants will move the knee up and down for 1 to 3 minutes at a time during the MRI scan.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Study of Functional Magnetic Resonance Signal Variations in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With the Application of a Dedicated Neuromotor Training

NCT07097077

fMRI ACL Injury Rehabilitation Exercise +1 more

RECRUITING NA

Neural Mechanisms of Muscle Control in Individuals With Knee Pain

NCT02854774

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1

Knee Extensor Muscle Properties in Young Women Symptomatic and Asymptomatic for Anterior Knee Pain

NCT02734030

Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome

COMPLETED

Analysis of Radiographic and Kinematic Features in FAI Patients

NCT05867069

Femoro Acetabular Impingement

COMPLETED

Relationship Between The Quadriceps Muscle Stiffness And Patellar Alignment For Healthy People

NCT04982679

Patellofemoral Maltracking

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic idiopathic patellofemoral pain, a potential precursor to osteoarthritis, is one of the most common problems of the knee. It is characterized by anterior knee pain that is aggravated by deep knee flexion, prolonged sitting, and repetitive flexion/extension. The most widely accepted theory in regards to the source of this pain is that a force imbalance around the knee leads to static patellofemoral malalignment and dynamic patellofemoral maltracking. In turn, this malalignment and maltracking leads to elevated joint contact stresses, which ultimately leads to patellofemoral pain. Current understanding of patellofemoral maltracking is typically focused on static 2D alignment (lateral tilt and displacement). Yet, patellofemoral pain is most often exacerbated during dynamic events and the patella has complete six degrees of freedom in its movement. More recent studies have been able to quantify patellofemoral kinematics during volitional dynamic tasks and demonstrate that the maltracking problem is more complex than originally postulated. Specifically, in patients with patellofemoral pain, altered kinematics are not limited to excessive patellar lateral translation and tilt, but include excessive patellar superior translation along with excessive flexion and valgus rotations. Flexion and valgus are sagittal and coronal plane rotations that cause the superior pole of the patella to shift anteriorly and medially, respectively. Recent work has shown that altered force balance around the knee can indeed lead to maltracking. However, the question remains whether correcting an existing force imbalance around the knee can normalize patellar kinematics and/or reduce pain. The purpose of this study is to determine how temporary iatrogenic loss of force in the vastus lateralis muscle alters the aberrant patellar kinematics in subjects with chronic idiopathic patellofemoral pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1/Control Volunteers

Healthy controls

No interventions assigned to this group

2/Volunteers with Pain

Subjects with Chronic Idiopathic Patellofemoral Pain

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and female volunteers between the ages of 18 and 55

Exclusion Criteria

All Volunteers

1. Any relevant medical problems, including 933 those preventing ambulation
2. Any serious injury to the joint being studied, previous surgery on the joint being studiedor extreme pain at the joint being studied or other condition that may explain the presence of PF\_pain (e.g., meniscal tear, arthritis)
3. Allergy/hypersensitivity to any local anesthetic agent (e.g., Novocain, lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine)
4. Liver disease
5. Open angle glaucoma
6. Cardiac arrhythmias, congenital heart disease
7. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
8. Any female who is pregnant

A volunteer will be excluded if they have a contraindication to MR imaging. Examples are:

1. Metal within their body, which might be expected to concentrate radiofrequency fields or cause tissue damage from twisting in a magnetic field (e.g., aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, implanted cardiac pacemaker or autodefibrillator, cochlear implant, other foreign body (e.g. metal shavings, insulin pump).
2. A condition, which would preclude them from participating in an MR imaging study (e.g., paralyzed hemidiaphragm, morbid obesity, severe claustrophobia)
3. A condition that presents an unnecessary risk to them or their unborn child (e.g., 953 pregnancy, previous surgery of uncertain type, symptoms of pheochromocytoma or insulinoma)

Subjects with Chronic Idiopathic Patellofemoral Pai:

1\. Lack of PF\_pain (either no active pain or current pain of \< 6 months duration)

Control Volunteers:

1. Any clinical signs of a knee impairment in the joint being studied, including abnormal range of motion, muscle weakness, malalignment, and ligament damage.
2. The presence of PF\_pain (either active or past)

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No