Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-09
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Does the appearance of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) vary in appearance on PET/MRI depending on graft type and time after surgery?
2. What is the appearance of the native ACL on Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI)?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Functional Performance Outcome After ACL Repair With Internal Brace Technique
NCT02760589
Dynamic Knee Laxity Measurement Coupled to MRI in Cases of Suspected Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
NCT02787096
Study of Functional Magnetic Resonance Signal Variations in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With the Application of a Dedicated Neuromotor Training
NCT07097077
MRI Morphology of Femoral Notch in ACL Injury
NCT06707285
Application of FMRI in Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
NCT04958915
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with and without a history of ACL reconstruction will undergo a low dose FDG PET scan in the same setting as their MRI. The PET examination will be performed such that the early phase of imaging is performed prior to the MRI and the delayed phase is completed immediately following the MRI. This dual-phase scanning will allow for both assessment of the vascularity of the graft as well as its metabolic activity.
Patients will be asked to provide study personnel with authorization to their medical records regarding the outcome of the knee graft. This authorization will be provided for 10 years from date of signed consent.
Comparisons of the finding in normal and reconstructed ligaments as well as between graft types based on time from reconstruction will demonstrate the feasibility of this imaging technique and allow for generation of an imaging based hypothesis that will provide metabolic activity of the graft in a post-operative knee.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient population with ACL injury or reconstruction
PET scan
low dose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET research scan with CEST sequence
MRI scan
standard of care MRI
Patient population without ACL injury or reconstruction
PET scan
low dose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET research scan with CEST sequence
MRI scan
standard of care MRI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET scan
low dose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET research scan with CEST sequence
MRI scan
standard of care MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled for a standard of care MRI at OSU.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
* Patients who are prisoners.
* Patients who are unable to provide consent.
* Patient with significant renal insufficiency, i.e. an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2.
* Patients who exhibit noticeable anxiety and/or claustrophobia or who exhibit sever vertigo when they are moved into the MR.
* Subjects with any type of bioimplant activated by mechanical, electronic, or magnetic means (e.g., cochlear implants, pacemakers, neurostimulators, biostimulators, electronic infusion pumps, etc.).
* Subjects with any type of ferromagnetic bioimplant that could potentially be displaced or damaged.
* Subjects that have vascular or aneurysm clips, or metallic staples from a surgical procedure.
* Subjects with permanent tattoo eye liner (may contain metallic coloring).
* Subjects that may have shrapnel imbedded in their bodies, such as from war wounds, metal workers and machinists (metallic fragments in or near eyes), severe auto accident victims.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cincinnati
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael V Knopp MD PhD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael V Knopp, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ohio State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RP0649/2013H0009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.