Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Functional Performance Outcome After ACL Repair With Internal Brace Technique
NCT ID: NCT02760589
Last Updated: 2018-07-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
92 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-11-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After ACL Reconstruction With DB Technique
NCT02000258
MRI Morphology of Femoral Notch in ACL Injury
NCT06707285
Molecular Imaging Assessment of ACL Viability
NCT03491046
Dynamic Knee Laxity Measurement Coupled to MRI in Cases of Suspected Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
NCT02787096
Stability of the Knee Joint After Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02993679
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since the native ACL is considered to be an important factor for the proprioceptive sensation, a removal during the reconstruction might have an adverse influence on muscular stabilisation, rehabilitation and functional performance of the knee joint. Thus a primary repair of the native ACL seems reasonable.
For tears of the anterior cruciate ligament near the femoral attachment a new method of surgical treatment can be applied. The InternalBrace method by Arthrex is performed arthroscopically and involves reattaching of the ACL that has avulsed off the femoral wall using a FiberTape by Arthrex. To the authors knowledge the augmentation with FiberTape by Arthrex has not been systematically evaluated. Promising results have been presented recently using a comparable method, which showed a high patient satisfaction, faster rehabilitation and a high rate of return to pre-injury sports level.
To assess the functional performance, a further aim of the study is to develop a new test battery consisting of strength tests and single-leg hop tests with the ability to distinguish between the functional performance of the injured and the uninjured leg in patients with ACL deficiency. Test batteries consisting of several hop tests has been described in the previous literature indicating a good test-retest reliability measuring lower leg performance. The functional performance is defined using the limb symmetry index in percent between each individuals lower limbs. This study aims to determine the LSI of healthy subjects using the values achieved by the subjects in the control group. A limb symmetry index (LSI) between 85% and 95% is considered sufficient for return to pivoting sports in patients after knee injury.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACL tear - conservative
conservative treatment
No interventions assigned to this group
ACL tear - ACL reconstruction
reconstruction of the ACL with autologous tendons
No interventions assigned to this group
ACL tear - Internal brace
augmentation of the ruptured ACL with Internal brace
No interventions assigned to this group
healthy subjects
control group of healthy subjects with no previous injury
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 60 years
* Patients who sustained an isolated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament at least 12 month after injury (for the subjects who received conservative therapy), respectively surgery (for the two groups in which subjects underwent surgery)
* MRI-confirmed tear of the anterior cruciate ligament near the femoral attachment
* Surgical treatment of the InternalBrace group must have been performed within the first six weeks after injury
* Women of reproductive age
* Confirmed written consent of each subject
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous knee injuries which required treatment
* Concomitant injuries such as fractures, articular cartilage lesions reaching subchondral bone, meniscal tears or lesions of the collateral ligaments which required an additional surgical intervention and therefore an extended post-op rehabilitation protocol
* Pregnant and nursing women
* Claustrophobia
* Existing contraindication against performing an MRI scan
* Taking certain concomitant medication(s) (especially cortisone), or conditions that interfere with a patient's ability to comply with all procedures
* Circumstances that interfere with the participant's ability to give informed consent (diminished understanding or comprehension, or a language other than German or English spoken
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AUVA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Georg Mattiassich
Dr. med. unit.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Georg Mattiassich, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AUVA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Traumacenter Linz
Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Siegel L, Vandenakker-Albanese C, Siegel D. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries: anatomy, physiology, biomechanics, and management. Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Jul;22(4):349-55. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182580cd0.
Engebretsen L, Benum P, Fasting O, Molster A, Strand T. A prospective, randomized study of three surgical techniques for treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Nov-Dec;18(6):585-90. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800605.
Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):995-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
Eggli S, Kohlhof H, Zumstein M, Henle P, Hartel M, Evangelopoulos DS, Bonel H, Kohl S. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2949-x. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomee P, Silbernagel KG, Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Aug;14(8):778-88. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0045-6. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Manske R, Reiman M. Functional performance testing for power and return to sports. Sports Health. 2013 May;5(3):244-50. doi: 10.1177/1941738113479925.
Itoh H, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Ichihashi N, Mizuno K. Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(4):241-5. doi: 10.1007/s001670050106.
Thomee R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1669-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Sep;12(5):350-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0518-4. Epub 2004 May 8.
Thomee R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomee P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, Karlsson J. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jun;20(6):1143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1912-y. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
Bjorklund K, Andersson L, Dalen N. Validity and responsiveness of the test of athletes with knee injuries: the new criterion based functional performance test instrument. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 May;17(5):435-45. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0674-z. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, Alcock GK, Giffin JR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;87(3):337-49. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060143. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Ageberg E, Thomee R, Neeter C, Silbernagel KG, Roos EM. Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Dec 15;59(12):1773-9. doi: 10.1002/art.24066.
Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK, McCormick FM, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):2325967113518305. doi: 10.1177/2325967113518305. eCollection 2014 Jan.
Micheo W, Hernandez L, Seda C. Evaluation, management, rehabilitation, and prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injury: current concepts. PM R. 2010 Oct;2(10):935-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7/2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.