Using Neurofeedback to Understand the Relationship Between Stress and Alcohol Consumption
NCT ID: NCT06247306
Last Updated: 2025-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-01
2027-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Individuals interested in participating in the study have to fulfill certain criteria...
* no serious medical or mental health diagnosis
* problematic alcohol drinking habits
* interested in improving drinking habits
...and undergo various non-invasive procedures
* filling out several questionnaires concerning personality and habits
* undergoing a mental performance task while being in a brain scanner (MRI)
* attempting to regulate their own brain activity while lying in the MRI scanner
* filling out an electronic diary for 6 weeks - concerning daily mood, stress, and alcohol habits
Participants will be randomly allocated to either one of 2 experimental groups. Both groups undergo the same tasks, receive the same instructions and only differ regarding some aspects of the brain self-regulation task .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Simultaneous Measurement of Electroencephalography (EEG) and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in Patients With Alcoholism
NCT00216905
Development Of Neuroimaging Methods To Assess The Neurobiology Of Addiction
NCT02535702
The Effect of Ethanol on Brain Activity
NCT00074360
Endophenotyping With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
NCT01503931
FMRI of Stress and Addictive Disorders
NCT01558973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to elucidate how neurocognitive processes during stress influence alcohol cravings and consumption. To this end, participants with problematic alcohol consumption will be recruited. After having filled out various questionnaires pertaining to their biographical data, alcohol consumption and personality traits, participants will be experimentally stressed during a brain scan using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). To reliably induce psychosocial stress, the ScanSTRESS test, a paradigm explicitly conceptualized for usage during MRI scanning, will be employed. Once the stress test is completed, participants will attempt to regulate their own neurological stress response through upregulation of the ACC using information about their current stress-induced brain activity (neurofeedback). Additionally, saliva samples will be regularly taken during the experiment to biologically observe the stress response through cortisol measurements. This will be followed by a 6-week follow-up phase, during which participants will be specifically asked about their alcohol cravings, alcohol consumption, and daily stress experiences.
By employing real-time fMRI neurofeedback, this study creates experimental conditions in which participants can self-regulate the neural stress response of the targeted brain network. Nonspecific effects of the neurofeedback paradigm are controlled using a sham condition (Yoke-control group). Participants are randomly assigned to either the control group or the real neurofeedback group (experimental group). This approach allows for the investigation of the neural self-regulation abilities of emotional control networks and their role in the connection between stress, alcohol cravings, and drinking behavior in real life.
In summary, this study aims to examine the relationship between the self-regulation abilities of neural stress responses and real-life drinking behavior.
Investigators hypothesize that 1) the stress experiment significantly increases acute self-reported stress in participants, 2) specifically stress-induced patterns of neural activity, namely increased striatal and thalamic activity as well as decreased ACC activity, predict alcohol cravings and consumption, 3) the experimental neurofeedback group exhibits higher ACC activity during brain self-regulation than the control group, 4) the experimental group shows lower alcohol craving/consumption during the follow-up phase.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
real-time fMRI neurofeedback (of the ACC)
Participants are instructed to reduce their stress-response by attempts to upregulate the ACC activity contigent on real-time feedback.
ScanSTRESS fMRI-paradigm (Streit et al., 2014)
The task is conducted within the MRI scanner and consists of two runs each lasting 11:20 mins., employs a block design and has two different conditions (performance, relaxation), as well as two different task within each condition. Participants undergo the following 2 tasks during the performance condition under time pressure: 1) serial subtraction, 2) a figure matching task. During the performance condition, all participants receive feedback (work faster, mistake, too slow) and are reprimanded concerning their performance. Two investigators in white coats observe the participants with critical facial expression, which is projected to participants through live-video feed during the tasks. The relaxation condition includes easy versions of arithmetic and figure matching task without time constrains or any type feedback on their performance. Performance and relaxation phases are appear in alternating order.
real-time fMRI neurofeedback
Two real-time fMRI neurofeedback sessions of 9:30 minutes each are conducted. During these sessions, the participants are instructed to regulate a feedback signal from the ACC. Participants are assigned to either the experimental or Yoke-control group through an automated double-blind procedure. In the neurofeedback sessions, participants in the experimental group receive a feedback signal indicating their current ACC activation. Participants in the control group receive the recorded feedback signal from another participant. The neurofeedback sessions follow a block structure with alternating feedback and rest periods.
Before, between, and after the two sections of the fMRI examination, subjective stress levels and alcohol craving are assessed, and saliva samples are collected for cortisol level determination.
Yoke-control group
Participants receive previously recorded feedback signal from other participants\' ACC activity instead of their own live ACC activity.
ScanSTRESS fMRI-paradigm (Streit et al., 2014)
The task is conducted within the MRI scanner and consists of two runs each lasting 11:20 mins., employs a block design and has two different conditions (performance, relaxation), as well as two different task within each condition. Participants undergo the following 2 tasks during the performance condition under time pressure: 1) serial subtraction, 2) a figure matching task. During the performance condition, all participants receive feedback (work faster, mistake, too slow) and are reprimanded concerning their performance. Two investigators in white coats observe the participants with critical facial expression, which is projected to participants through live-video feed during the tasks. The relaxation condition includes easy versions of arithmetic and figure matching task without time constrains or any type feedback on their performance. Performance and relaxation phases are appear in alternating order.
real-time fMRI neurofeedback
Two real-time fMRI neurofeedback sessions of 9:30 minutes each are conducted. During these sessions, the participants are instructed to regulate a feedback signal from the ACC. Participants are assigned to either the experimental or Yoke-control group through an automated double-blind procedure. In the neurofeedback sessions, participants in the experimental group receive a feedback signal indicating their current ACC activation. Participants in the control group receive the recorded feedback signal from another participant. The neurofeedback sessions follow a block structure with alternating feedback and rest periods.
Before, between, and after the two sections of the fMRI examination, subjective stress levels and alcohol craving are assessed, and saliva samples are collected for cortisol level determination.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ScanSTRESS fMRI-paradigm (Streit et al., 2014)
The task is conducted within the MRI scanner and consists of two runs each lasting 11:20 mins., employs a block design and has two different conditions (performance, relaxation), as well as two different task within each condition. Participants undergo the following 2 tasks during the performance condition under time pressure: 1) serial subtraction, 2) a figure matching task. During the performance condition, all participants receive feedback (work faster, mistake, too slow) and are reprimanded concerning their performance. Two investigators in white coats observe the participants with critical facial expression, which is projected to participants through live-video feed during the tasks. The relaxation condition includes easy versions of arithmetic and figure matching task without time constrains or any type feedback on their performance. Performance and relaxation phases are appear in alternating order.
real-time fMRI neurofeedback
Two real-time fMRI neurofeedback sessions of 9:30 minutes each are conducted. During these sessions, the participants are instructed to regulate a feedback signal from the ACC. Participants are assigned to either the experimental or Yoke-control group through an automated double-blind procedure. In the neurofeedback sessions, participants in the experimental group receive a feedback signal indicating their current ACC activation. Participants in the control group receive the recorded feedback signal from another participant. The neurofeedback sessions follow a block structure with alternating feedback and rest periods.
Before, between, and after the two sections of the fMRI examination, subjective stress levels and alcohol craving are assessed, and saliva samples are collected for cortisol level determination.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of 2 to a maximum of 5 criteria for alcohol use disorder according to DSM-5
* no clinical necessity for detoxification treatment
* participants may have a moderate cannabis use disorder and tobacco use disorder
* Capacity for consent and ability to use self-assessment scales
* Sufficient knowledge of German
* Willingness to use a mobile phone with Android operating system
Exclusion Criteria
* Current substance use other than cannabis and tobacco
* Current diagnosis of one of the following conditions according to DSM-5: (hypo)manic episode, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder
* History of severe head trauma or other severe central neurological disorders (dementia, Parkinson\'s disease, multiple sclerosis)
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Use of medications known to interact with the central nervous system within the last 10 days; testing at least four half-lives after the last dose
* Exercising the prerogative of the \"Right not to know\" in the context of incidental findings during an examination or investigation
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin F Gerchen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Institute of Mental Health
Peter Kirsch, Prof., PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Institute of Mental Health
Falk Kiefer, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Institute of Mental Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Institute of Mental Health - Department of Clinical Psychology
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolkowicz NR, Peltier MR, Wemm S, MacLean RR. Subjective stress and alcohol use among young adult and adult drinkers: Systematic review of studies using Intensive Longitudinal Designs. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Mar 11;3:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100039. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Vollstadt-Klein S, Hermann D, Rabinstein J, Wichert S, Klein O, Ende G, Mann K. Increased activation of the ACC during a spatial working memory task in alcohol-dependence versus heavy social drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 May;34(5):771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01149.x. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Vollstadt-Klein S, Lemenager T, Jorde A, Kiefer F, Nakovics H. Development and validation of the craving automated scale for alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Feb;39(2):333-42. doi: 10.1111/acer.12636.
Streit F, Haddad L, Paul T, Frank J, Schafer A, Nikitopoulos J, Akdeniz C, Lederbogen F, Treutlein J, Witt S, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Rietschel M, Kirsch P, Wust S. A functional variant in the neuropeptide S receptor 1 gene moderates the influence of urban upbringing on stress processing in the amygdala. Stress. 2014 Jul;17(4):352-61. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.921903. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Sinha R, Li CS. Imaging stress- and cue-induced drug and alcohol craving: association with relapse and clinical implications. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Jan;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.1080/09595230601036960.
Sinha R, Fox HC, Hong KA, Bergquist K, Bhagwagar Z, Siedlarz KM. Enhanced negative emotion and alcohol craving, and altered physiological responses following stress and cue exposure in alcohol dependent individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Apr;34(5):1198-208. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.78. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
Seo D, Lacadie CM, Tuit K, Hong KI, Constable RT, Sinha R. Disrupted ventromedial prefrontal function, alcohol craving, and subsequent relapse risk. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;70(7):727-39. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.762.
Seo D, Lacadie CM, Sinha R. Neural Correlates and Connectivity Underlying Stress-Related Impulse Control Difficulties in Alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Sep;40(9):1884-94. doi: 10.1111/acer.13166. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science. 1997 Oct 3;278(5335):52-8. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5335.52.
Kirschbaum C, Pirke KM, Hellhammer DH. The 'Trier Social Stress Test'--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology. 1993;28(1-2):76-81. doi: 10.1159/000119004.
Cox WM, Klinger E. A motivational model of alcohol use. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988 May;97(2):168-80. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.97.2.168. No abstract available.
Clay JM, Parker MO. The role of stress-reactivity, stress-recovery and risky decision-making in psychosocial stress-induced alcohol consumption in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Nov;235(11):3243-3257. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5027-0. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Clay JM, Adams C, Archer P, English M, Hyde A, Stafford LD, Parker MO. Psychosocial stress increases craving for alcohol in social drinkers: Effects of risk-taking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 14;158(16):1789-95. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.
Blaine SK, Seo D, Sinha R. Peripheral and prefrontal stress system markers and risk of relapse in alcoholism. Addict Biol. 2017 Mar;22(2):468-478. doi: 10.1111/adb.12320. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Amlung M, MacKillop J. Understanding the effects of stress and alcohol cues on motivation for alcohol via behavioral economics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jun;38(6):1780-9. doi: 10.1111/acer.12423. Epub 2014 May 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRR265-C04
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
U1111-1302-2402
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.