Comparison of Occipital Nerve and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade
NCT ID: NCT06243874
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2024-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Patients With Episodic Migraine
NCT06997562
Pulse Radiofrequency and Occipital Nerve Block for Chronic Migraine Patients
NCT06247592
Ultrasound Guided Block of Stellate Ganglion Versus Greater Occipital Nerve in Resistant Migraine and Correlation to Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide
NCT06662461
Sphenopalatine Block Versus BOTOX in Management of Chronic Migraine
NCT06974617
Greater Occipital Nerve Block Versus Pulse Radiofrequency in Migraine
NCT06345326
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is stated that sphenopalatine ganglion blockade reduces the number of headache days and is effective in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Although there are studies on the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade and transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in migraine treatment, there are no studies comparing their superiority over each other. This study aims to evaluate the effects of repetitive greater occipital nerve blockade and transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade on headache severity, number of days with headache, headache duration, functionality and medication use in patients with episodic migraine, and to compare whether they are superior to each other.
In this single center randomised study participants' episodic migraine will be diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd version (ICHD-3) criteria. Demographic information of the patients, including age, gender, comorbidities, educational status, marital status and migraine duration, will be recorded. Pain intensity of patients will be evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scala (NRS 11) scale, and functionality will be evaluated using MIDAS. Before the procedure, the number of headache days in a 1-month period, headache severity, duration, amount of medication use (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, triptan) and MIDAS score will be recorded. Participants will be randomized into 2 groups. When 21 participants are randomized in each group, participant 26 will be excluded from the list because it is in both groups. Group 1 greater occipital nerve block; It will be applied for participants 37, 27, 35, 13, 36, 18, 34, 33, 6, 12, 3, 25, 19, 1, 14, 9, 21, 38, 10, 2. Group 2 sphenopalatine block; It will be applied to patients 22, 1, 24, 11, 35, 33, 17, 14, 8, 31, 39, 5, 2, 28, 41, 36, 15, 7, 34, 27. Greater occipital nerve block will be applied to participant number 26 by repeating the procedure order since the number of participants in each group is equally divided.
Participants will receive greater occipital nerve blockade and transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade once a week for the first month and then once a week for a further 1 month. At the 1st month, 2nd month and 3rd month follow-up visits of the participants, the number of headache days, average pain intensity and pain duration, MIDAS scores and the amount of medication used (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, triptan) will be recorded with pain diaries. Participants' pain diaries, MIDAS scores and the amount of medication they use will be recorded. Additionally, possible complications in patients will also be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
greater occipital nerve block
Following intravenous access and monitoring, participants are placed in the prone position. The medial 1/3 of the line between the protuberance occipital externa and the mastoid process is palpated. The intervention area is cleaned with antiseptic solution. Then, 2 cc of 2% lidocaine is injected into the palpated area after confirming that it is not in the vascular area by negative aspiration. Participants are observed for 30 minutes for possible complications.
The participant will receive a block once a week for the first month and then once a month for the next 2 months.
greater occipital nerve block
greater occipital nerve block
transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
Following intravenous access and monitoring, patients are placed in the supine position. A cotton swab impregnated with 2 cc of 2% lidocaine is advanced from the nostril along the upper edge of the middle turbinate until it reaches the posterior wall of the nasopharynx. The stick impregnated with local anesthetic is kept in the target area for 20 minutes. Participants are observed for 30 minutes for possible complications.
The participant will receive a block once a week for the first month and then once a month for the next 2 months.
transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
greater occipital nerve block
greater occipital nerve block
transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosing migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd version (ICHD-3) criteria
* Patients diagnosed with episodic migraine
* Failure to provide pain palliation with at least 1 prophylactic medication
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant patients
* Those with bleeding diathesis
* Patients who are allergic to local anesthetics given during the procedure
* Patients with open skull defects who have undergone craniotomy
* Patients with previous nasal/sinus surgery
* Patients with medication overuse headaches
* Presence of causes such as hypertension, vasculitis, malignancy, etc. that may cause headaches
* Patients who have received interventional headache treatment in the last 6 months
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hanzade Aybuke Unal
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hanzade A Unal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the american headache society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2015 Jan;55(1):3-20. doi: 10.1111/head.12499.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
Cady RK, Saper J, Dexter K, Cady RJ, Manley HR. Long-term efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study for repetitive sphenopalatine blockade with bupivacaine vs. saline with the Tx360 device for treatment of chronic migraine. Headache. 2015 Apr;55(4):529-42. doi: 10.1111/head.12546. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Binfalah M, Alghawi E, Shosha E, Alhilly A, Bakhiet M. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache. Pain Res Treat. 2018 May 7;2018:2516953. doi: 10.1155/2018/2516953. eCollection 2018.
Malekian N, Bastani PB, Oveisgharan S, Nabaei G, Abdi S. Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on patients with episodic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2022 May;42(6):481-489. doi: 10.1177/03331024211058182. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Unal HA, Basari A, Celiker OS, Cakar Turhan KS, Asik I, Ozgencil GE. Comparison of Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Patients with Episodic Migraine. J Clin Med. 2024 May 21;13(11):3027. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113027.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023/381
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.