Selective Defunctioning Stoma in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06214988

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational trial with a nested randomized controlled trial is to investigate a selective approach of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. The primary outcome is a hybrid so-called textbook outcome; stoma-free survival at two years without major LARS, reflecting a functionally appropriate outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Secondary outcomes include anastomotic leakage, postoperative mortality, reinterventions, stoma-related complications, quality of life measures, LARS, and permanent stoma rate up to two years after index surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Systematic use of defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer has been shown to reduce symptomatic anastomotic leakage and associated interventions. However, accumulating data suggest that this comes at the price of worse bowel dysfunction, a higher rate of permanent stomas and kidney injury. We aim to study whether a selective strategy of defunctioning stoma use might lead to fewer adverse consequences, while still being safe for patients.

This is a multicentre international prospective trial including a non-blinded randomised clinical trial. All patients with a primary rectal cancer planned for low anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis are eligible. Patients enter a prospective observational study, in which a randomised clinical trial is nested. Patients eligible for randomisation are aged below 80 years, have an American Society of Anesthesiologists' fitness grade I or II, have no unresected distant disease, and have a predicted lower risk of anastomotic leakage. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to either an experimental arm with no defunctioning stoma or to a control arm with a defunctioning stoma. The randomisation is computer-generated with a concealed sequence and stratified by participating hospital and radiotherapy use. The main outcome is the composite measure of 2-year stoma-free survival without major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Secondary outcomes include anastomotic leakage, postoperative mortality, reinterventions, stoma-related complications, quality of life measures, LARS, and permanent stoma rate up to two years after index surgery. To be able to state superiority of any study arm regarding the main outcome, with 90% statistical power and assuming 25% attrition, we aim to enrol 212 patients.

This study has been approved by Ethical Review Authority in Sweden (2023-04347-01) and seeks permission in Norway and Danmark, respectively. The results will be disseminated through patient associations, popular science, the broader medical community, and conventional scientific channels.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Observational trial with nested randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

selective approach to defunctioning stoma

With randomisation to this experimental arm (selective approach), no defunctioning stoma is constructed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

selective approach defunctioning stoma

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

With randomisation to this experimental arm (selective approach), no defunctioning stoma is constructed.

routine use of defunctioning stoma

With randomisation to this control arm (systematic approach), a defunctioning stoma is constructed using the marked stoma site. A loop ileostomy is fashioned using an ileal loop close to the ileocecal valve, while a loop colostomy can be derived from either the transverse or a redundant left colon.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

selective approach defunctioning stoma

With randomisation to this experimental arm (selective approach), no defunctioning stoma is constructed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with rectal cancer planned for a low anterior resection with anastomosis by TME with any surgical approach


* Patients aged less than 80 years
* Patients with American Society of Anesthetists' (ASA) fitness grade I or II as determined by the anaesthesiologist or the surgeon
* Patients without clear radiological signs of distant disease before rectal cancer surgery (previous metastatic surgery is no exclusion criterion)
* Anastomotic leak risk score of 0-1
* Willingness to be randomised

Exclusion Criteria

* Insufficient command of Swedish, Norwegian, Danish or English to understand questionnaires or consent
* Emergency rectal resection (tumour resection due to large bowel obstruction, perforation, etc)
* Previous pelvic irradiation (due to e.g. gynaecological or urological cancer)
* Preoperative tumour perforation or pelvic sepsis
* Beyond TME surgery and/or concurrent resection of other organ
* Concurrent corticosteroid treatment (prednisone-equivalent dosage ≥10 mg daily)
* Planned postoperative chemotherapy
* Smoking not completely ceased four weeks before surgery

-\>2 staple firings for rectal transection
* Intraoperative blood loss ≥250 ml for minimally invasive surgery
* Intraoperative blood loss ≥500 ml for open or converted surgery
* More than one intraabdominal anastomosis performed
* Incomplete doughnuts
* Air-leak test positive
* Any significant intraoperative adverse event at the discretion of the operating surgeon (e.g. ureterotomy, bowel or tumour perforation, major medical event - pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia) (Gawria, 2022)
* TME with anastomosis ultimately not done
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ersta Hospital, Sweden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Örebro University, Sweden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skane University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pamela Buchwald

associate professor, senior consultant surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pamela Buchwald, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Skåne University Hospital, Lund University

Martin Rutegård, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University Hospital, Umeå University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Skåne University Hospital

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caroline Nilsson, RN

Role: CONTACT

004640331000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Pamela Buchwald, MD PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rutegard M, Lindskold M, Jorgren F, Landerholm K, Matthiessen P, Forsmo HM, Park J, Rosenberg J, Schultz J, Seeberg LT, Segelman J, Buchwald P. SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA): Protocol for a prospective study with a nested randomized clinical trial investigating stoma-free survival without major LARS following total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb;27(2):e70009. doi: 10.1111/codi.70009.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39887540 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-0437-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Norwegian Stoma Trial
NCT05243771 UNKNOWN