Screening of Endovascular Thrombectomy With MRI in Acute Ischemic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT06213870

Last Updated: 2024-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

309 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the role of MRI evaluation based on FVH-DWI mismatch principle in preoperative evaluation of endovascular thrombolectomy.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* The consistency between MRI and perfusion examination in determining EVT indications.
* The consistency of functional independence rate between patients screening with MRI and perfusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MRI is the preferred imaging mode in many centers,for the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences are highly sensitive to acute cerebral ischemia.In addition, MRI does not require intravenous contrast agent, which is simpler and more popular than perfusion.Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)sequence vascular hyperintensity(FVH) is defined as focal, serpentine, or linear hyperintensity that usually occurs in the Sylvian fissure and is associated with large-vessel occlusion or stenosis.The FVH-DWI mismatch(defined as the FVH extended beyond the boundary of the DWI cortical lesions) had been confirmed has excellent sensitivity and specificity in predicting PWI-DWI mismatch.It is not well established whether MRI based on FVH-DWI mismatch and perfusion evaluation differ in determining EVT indications and outcomes.

The main objectives of this study were to (1) determine the proportion of patients eligible for EVT surgery selected by MRI based on FVH-DWI mismatch vs perfusion in a large multicenter registry and (2) identify statistical differences in functional outcomes and safety outcomes between the two evaluation methods.

Patients with ischemic stroke with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion in the late (6-24 h) time window from real-world, single center retrospective cohort registry were compared.In the MRI group, patients with FVH-DWI mismatch underwent EVT surgery or were otherwise treated with medication.In the perfusion group, surgical indications referring the DEFUSE 3 standards. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence rate (mRS score ≤2) in all patients included(including EVT patient and medication patients).Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence Vascular Hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted Imaging Mismatch(FVH-DWI Mismatch) Image Evaluation Endovascular Thrombectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRI group

MRI Images were acquired on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany).Image sequences and typical parameter ranges were diffusion tensor imaging (repetition time \[TR\], 5200ms; echo time \[TE\], 80 ms; 4mm slice thickness; 40 slices) by using SE-EPI sequence; T1 imaging (TR, 240 ms; TE, 2.47 ms; 5 mm slice thickness; 17 slices) by using SE sequence;T2 imaging (TR, 4480 ms; TE, 99 ms; 4 mm slice thickness; 24 slices) by using FSE sequence; FLAIR imaging (TR, 8500 ms; TE, 95 ms; 5 mm slice thickness; 21 slices) by using IR sequence; time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography images (TR, 20 ms; TE, 3 ms; 0.55 mm slice thickness; 40 slices) by using 3D-TOF sequence;

In the MRI group, patients with FVH-DWI mismatch were considered to have EVT indications and were treated with EVT, while patients without FVH-DWI mismatch were treated with medication.

Surgical criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In the MRI group, patients with FVH-DWI mismatch underwent EVT surgery or were otherwise treated with medication.

In the perfusion group, patients who meet the criteria of DEFUSE3 will receive EVT surgery, otherwise receive medication.

Perfusion group

The protocol of CT Perfusion was as follows: 100 mm coverage in the z-axis, tube voltage, 80 kV; tube current, 120 mA; section thickness, 5 mm. Twenty-four consecutive spiral acquisitions with 0.28 seconds of rotation time and 1.70 seconds of inter scan delay time were performed.

Patients in the perfusion group were treated with EVT when there exist perfusion mismatch(defined as regional cerebral blood flow (\<30%) was \< 70 ml with mismatch ratio ≥ 1.8 and mismatch volume ≥ 15 ml), and were treated with medication when there was no perfusion mismatch.

Surgical criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In the MRI group, patients with FVH-DWI mismatch underwent EVT surgery or were otherwise treated with medication.

In the perfusion group, patients who meet the criteria of DEFUSE3 will receive EVT surgery, otherwise receive medication.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgical criteria

In the MRI group, patients with FVH-DWI mismatch underwent EVT surgery or were otherwise treated with medication.

In the perfusion group, patients who meet the criteria of DEFUSE3 will receive EVT surgery, otherwise receive medication.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (1) age ≥ 18 years old;
* (2) symptoms consistent with acute ischemic stroke and an onset time of 6-24h;
* (3) CT ASPECTS score≥6 points;NIHSS≥6points; modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-2 points prior to stroke;
* (4) internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or M1 segment of middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1) and M2 proximal segment occlusion with definite diagnosis.
* (5)agree to comply with the protocol follow-up requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* (1)Image unanalyzable.
* (2)3 months follow-up was not completed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Wei

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming Wei, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TJHH-2023-WM51

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stroke Imaging Package Study
NCT02485275 COMPLETED