Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP

NCT ID: NCT06197815

Last Updated: 2024-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

754 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-03

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure. It takes time to learn the basic skill and at least 180 - 200 cases for trainees to achieve competency in ERCP. Hands-on practice in patients remains the gold standard for ERCP training. It required the trainer to stand by the trainee in the procedure room to assist. There were insufficient patients for most trainees to achieve competence until the trainee graduate. Technology-enabled health care at a distance has profound scientific potential and accordingly has been met with growing interest. We hypothesized that the trainee can be safely guided by a senior trainer off-site with the endoscopic view displayed on a screen. Using the teleguidance, the trainer can even continue to provide guidance when the trainees complete their training and return to their hospitals until they achieve the recommended clinical competency. Given the advantages of the off-site teleguidance, it could be an attractive substitute for hands-on assistance to ERCP training.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-site assistance (OA group) could achieve a comparable success rate to standard hands-on assistance (HA group) with regard to the rates of successful selective biliary cannulation during ERCP training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ERCP Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Off-site assistance group

The trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation outside the procedure room through a high-definition screen displaying the endoscopic view. Trainees wear headphones, and trainers use intercom to provide the unlimited verbal instructions. The trainer was not allowed into the procedure room and touched the endoscope or accessories until the trainee ask for help or failed to achieve deep biliary cannulation. Then the trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation. The trainer would halt and correct the trainee's inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The assistance type during ERCP

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.

Hands-on assistance group

During trainees' attempted cannulation, the trainer gave unlimited verbal instructions with hands-on assistance limited to only adjustment of scope position if necessary. To avoid unintended cannulation, the trainer was not allowed to touch the control section of the scope or the sphincterotome used for cannulation. However, the trainer would correct any inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications. The trainees could ask for help or stop cannulation at any time if they were not comfortable continuing the procedure. The trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The assistance type during ERCP

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The assistance type during ERCP

The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged 18-90 years who received ERCP
2. Patients with native papilla

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with altered anatomy (Billroth I/II, Roux-en-Y)
2. Type II duodenal stenosis
3. Previously failed cannulation
4. Chronic pancreatitis with stones in the pancreatic head
5. Hemodynamic instability
6. Lactating or pregnant women
7. Inability to give written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanglin Pan

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yanglin Pan, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-29-84771536

Xu Wang

Role: CONTACT

13395437645

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bo Ning, MD

Role: primary

13996476336

Yanglin Pan, MD

Role: primary

86-29-84771536

Mingxing Xia, MD

Role: primary

13906524284

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20232429

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.