Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP
NCT ID: NCT06197815
Last Updated: 2024-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
754 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-03
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-site assistance (OA group) could achieve a comparable success rate to standard hands-on assistance (HA group) with regard to the rates of successful selective biliary cannulation during ERCP training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Off-site Assistance on Success Rate of Selective Cannulation During hands-on ERCP Training
NCT05249400
Effect of Different Length of Time for Trainees to Attempt Cannulation on Success Rate of Selective Cannulation During hands-on ERCP Training
NCT01851226
Difficult Cannulation Criteria in Trainee Involved ERCP Cannulation
NCT04609917
Effect of Anatomy of Major Duodenal Papilla on the Difficulty of Cannulation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT03550768
Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography AI Assisted System Validation on Effectiveness and Safety
NCT04719117
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Off-site assistance group
The trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation outside the procedure room through a high-definition screen displaying the endoscopic view. Trainees wear headphones, and trainers use intercom to provide the unlimited verbal instructions. The trainer was not allowed into the procedure room and touched the endoscope or accessories until the trainee ask for help or failed to achieve deep biliary cannulation. Then the trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation. The trainer would halt and correct the trainee's inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications.
The assistance type during ERCP
The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.
Hands-on assistance group
During trainees' attempted cannulation, the trainer gave unlimited verbal instructions with hands-on assistance limited to only adjustment of scope position if necessary. To avoid unintended cannulation, the trainer was not allowed to touch the control section of the scope or the sphincterotome used for cannulation. However, the trainer would correct any inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications. The trainees could ask for help or stop cannulation at any time if they were not comfortable continuing the procedure. The trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation.
The assistance type during ERCP
The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The assistance type during ERCP
The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with native papilla
Exclusion Criteria
2. Type II duodenal stenosis
3. Previously failed cannulation
4. Chronic pancreatitis with stones in the pancreatic head
5. Hemodynamic instability
6. Lactating or pregnant women
7. Inability to give written informed consent
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University
UNKNOWN
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University
UNKNOWN
Air Force Military Medical University, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanglin Pan
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY20232429
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.