Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-18
2022-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among ERCP-related complications, especially "post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)", which occurs due to the anatomical structure of the pancreatic biliary system, statistically occurs in about 5-10% of patients who first received ERCP. It is known, and treatment for PEP is the same as treatment for general acute pancreatitis but is known to have a relatively worse prognosis.
The basis of treatment for acute pancreatitis is a conservative treatment based on fasting and fluid treatment, and starting oral diet after abdominal pain and pancreatic enzyme levels (amylase/lipase) normalized. However, a recent study reported that early oral diet could improve the patient's prognosis. According to a systematic review of 11 randomized trial papers by Valerie et al., it was reported that the early diet had the effect of reducing hospital stay without increasing adverse events when comparing the prognosis of the early refeeding group and delayed refeeding group. This result is theoretically considered to be because the oral diet has the advantage of increasing intestinal permeability, gut motility and reducing the likelihood of pancreatic necrosis/ infection compared to the parenteral diet.
As above, PEP has the same treatment method as general acute pancreatitis but is known to have a relatively worse prognosis. However, the effect of an early diet recently attempted in acute pancreatitis has not been reported in patients with PEP. Therefore, we investigate the effects of early and delayed diets on the prognosis of patients with PEP through a prospective multicenter study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Need for Repeat ERCP After Endoscopic Treatment of Postsurgical Biliary Leaks
NCT05141942
a Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Complication
NCT06277414
Tailored Hydration for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT03561441
Left Lateral Position and Prone Position for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT02594475
Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP in Patients With Altered Gastric Anatome
NCT01620632
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Evaluation of eligibility Eligibility is determined based on the basic patient data including physical examination, vital signs, body measurements, medical history, concomitant drugs, laboratory tests, and other basic examinations made at the first visit.
3. Grouping and randomization After ERCP was performed, the study subjects who were judged to have PEP according to enroll criteria were divided into early and delayed refeeding groups using a random number table and assigned 1:1 to proceed with the study.
4. Timing of refeeding In the early refeeding group, oral diet is started 24 hours after PEP is confirmed.
In the delayed refeeding group, oral diet is started after confirmation of restoring of normal bowel sound, pain decreasing below VAS 2. The oral diet starts with SOW (Sips of water) and builds up sequentially in the order of clear liquid diet-soft diet, considering patient tolerability.
5. Interruption of refeeding In both early and delayed refeeding groups, the oral diet is stopped when the pain scale the patient complains after starting oral diet increases to VAS 5 points or more, or the patient refuses to eat due to abdominal pain or other reasons. The diet is restarted after the amylase/lipase level decreases below the upper normal limit, the patient's pain has disappeared, and the bowel movement is restored.
6. Dropout criteria
1. In the case of delayed diet group when symptoms persist for more than 96 hours and cannot start a diet
2. When fasting is necessary for other reason, such as an imaging test or endoscopy
3. When it is determined that a parenteral diet is necessary for reasons such as difficulty swallowing
4. When the researcher judged that the clinical trial cannot be continued
7. Discharge criteria and hospitalization period for PEP If the patient is tolerable for more than 24 hours after the soft diet (abdominal pain improvement, lab amylase/lipase level decreases to less than 2 times the upper normal limit, it is judged that PEP has improved and the discharge criteria have been satisfied. From the point of diagnosis of PEP to the point of time when the discharge criteria are satisfied is defined as the "hospitalization period for PEP".
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
early refeeding group
In the early refeeding group, oral diet is started 24 hours after PEP is confirmed.
early refeeding
In the early refeeding group, oral diet is started 24 hours after PEP is confirmed. The oral diet starts with SOW (Sips of water) and builds up sequentially in the order of clear liquid diet-soft diet, considering patient tolerability.
delayed refeeding group
In the delayed refeeding group, oral diet is started after confirmation of restoring of normal bowel sound, pain decreasing below VAS 2.
delayed refeeding
In the delayed refeeding group, oral diet is started after confirmation of restoring of normal bowel sound, pain decreasing below VAS 2. The oral diet starts with SOW (Sips of water) and builds up sequentially in the order of clear liquid diet-soft diet, considering patient tolerability.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
early refeeding
In the early refeeding group, oral diet is started 24 hours after PEP is confirmed. The oral diet starts with SOW (Sips of water) and builds up sequentially in the order of clear liquid diet-soft diet, considering patient tolerability.
delayed refeeding
In the delayed refeeding group, oral diet is started after confirmation of restoring of normal bowel sound, pain decreasing below VAS 2. The oral diet starts with SOW (Sips of water) and builds up sequentially in the order of clear liquid diet-soft diet, considering patient tolerability.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. As patients who developed pancreatitis after receiving ERCP, the following must be satisfied at the same time.
1. increased serum amylase or lipase 3 times higher than the normal range, at 4 hours after ERCP or the morning of the following day,
2. New or worsening abdominal pain compatible with pancreatitis, arising 4 hours after ERCP or the next morning
Exclusion Criteria
2. If complications such as abdominal perforation or bleeding have occurred or are suspected
3. If it is judged as severe acute pancreatitis with multi-organ failure la.
4. When PEP has occurred, but additional imaging tests and endoscopy for diagnosis of the underlying disease or treatment of complications of the patient are required, and fasting is necessary regardless of this study
5. Patients with a history of chronic pancreatitis
6. Pregnant women, lactating women
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jung Hyun Jo
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Severance Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, , South Korea
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, , South Korea
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital
Changwon, , South Korea
Kyungpook National University School of Medicine
Daegu, , South Korea
Gachon University College of Medicine
Incheon, , South Korea
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jung Wan Choe
Role: primary
Sung Yong Han
Role: primary
Jae Min Lee
Role: primary
Dong Kee Jang
Role: primary
Eui Joo Kim
Role: primary
Dong Kee Jang
Role: primary
Sang Hyub Lee
Role: primary
Young Hoon Choi
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jo JH, Lee JM, Jang DK, Choe JW, Han SY, Choi YH, Kim EJ, Kim HY, Jung MK, Lee SH. Early Oral Refeeding in Patients with Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gut Liver. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.5009/gnl250110. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2020-1237
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.