Establishing a Sonographic Based Algorithm to Verify Pancreatic Stent Position Placed to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Before Endoscopic Removal
NCT ID: NCT04546867
Last Updated: 2023-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-07
2023-04-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
On the day of removal of the pancreatic stent, all patients receive a sonography by an experienced investigator on the ward and by another, uninformed investigator with a high-end device. If a pancreatic stent is visualized in the pancreatic duct, the patient will have an esophagogastroduodenoscopy to remove the pancreatic stent. If sonography cannot find a pancreatic stent in the pancreatic duct an x-ray will be performed as suggested by the European and international guidelines. If the pancreatic stent spontaneously dislocated into the small bowel tract according to x-ray, no further investigation will be performed. If a stent is visulized in situ by x-ray, it will be removed by endoscopyl.
Statistical analysis will be done in cooperation with the statistical biomedical institute oft he university hospital in Frankfurt.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sonographic Detection of Prophylactic Pancreatic Stents
NCT03649399
Early Precut Versus Pancreatic Stent for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT02497872
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Prevention by Stent Insertion
NCT01673763
Treatment Strategy of Pancreatic Radiolucent Stone
NCT04628273
Endotherapy and/or Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Painless Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT07074379
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sonography arm
Sonography is being performed by expericenced investigators to visualize a pancreatic stent in the pancreatic duct. If the stent is being visualized, an endoscopy will be performed to remove the stent. Otherwise, x-ray will be needed to confirm the sonographic finding of a dislodged pancreatic stent with no further need of intervention. If x-ray finds a pancreatic stent in situ opposingly to ultrasound, an endoscopy will be performed to confirm the stents position and eventually remove it.
Sonographic based visualization of a pancreatic stent
As described above. All patients start with an ultasound-based approach to visualize pancreatic stents position. Depending on the findings, x-ray will be performed if no stent is visualized in the pancreatic duct or an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed to remove the pancreatic stent and confirm sonographic findings if the pancreatic stent is displayed in situ.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sonographic based visualization of a pancreatic stent
As described above. All patients start with an ultasound-based approach to visualize pancreatic stents position. Depending on the findings, x-ray will be performed if no stent is visualized in the pancreatic duct or an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed to remove the pancreatic stent and confirm sonographic findings if the pancreatic stent is displayed in situ.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age of at least 18 years
* written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* no given consent
* other indication for pancreatic stenting
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Georg Dultz
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Denzer U, Beilenhoff U, Eickhoff A, Faiss S, Huttl P, In der Smitten S, Jakobs R, Jenssen C, Keuchel M, Langer F, Lerch MM, Lynen Jansen P, May A, Menningen R, Moog G, Rosch T, Rosien U, Vowinkel T, Wehrmann T, Weickert U; Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten. [S2k guideline: quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy, AWMF registry no. 021-022]. Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;53(12):E1-227. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109598. Epub 2016 Jan 19. No abstract available. German.
Tryliskyy Y, Bryce GJ. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Pathophysiology, early identification and risk stratification. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jan;27(1):149-154. doi: 10.17219/acem/66773.
Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Mar;65(3):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.021.
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
Fan JH, Qian JB, Wang YM, Shi RH, Zhao CJ. Updated meta-analysis of pancreatic stent placement in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7577-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7577.
Loloi J, Lipkin JS, Gagliardi EM, Levenick JM. Assessing spontaneous passage of prophylactic pancreatic duct stents by X-ray: is a radiology report adequate? Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jul 16;12:2631774519862895. doi: 10.1177/2631774519862895. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 May;53(6):620-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.114422.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fisher L, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Krinsky ML, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RN, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.252. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FRA-UNI-PANCSTENT-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.