Effects of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children With Cerebral Palsy Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06196944
Last Updated: 2024-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-08
2023-11-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Children's ability to rely on speech as a primary mode of communication can be compromised by cerebral palsy. Children with communication difficulties face many barriers to participating in everyday life and have a heightened risk of social isolation and mental health problems.
So, augmentative, and alternative communication (AAC) strategies and tools are helpful for children with CP. AAC is classified into manual signs and symbols, and low, mid, and high- tech communication aids form part of a total communication approach whereby all potential modalities of communication are explored and supported. The World Health Organization International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health for Children and Youth is increasingly being used to support decision-making. The study will be carried out at Rising Sun Institute for Special Children. The study design for this study is Randomized Control Trials. The convenience Sampling Technique will be used to collect data and 16 children with cerebral palsy will be included in this study. Both males and females with the age range of 3-15 years will be included in this study. The children will be randomly assigned into groups, group A will be allocated 8 children as the control group, and in group B, 8 as the treatment/ interventional group. Dysarthric Profile will be used for assessment purposes and aided Augmentative and Alternative communication system for the intervention. The pre-assessment of the child's Early Functional development will be done. Then, the low- tech (PECS) will be used for 6 weeks for the intervention. We will take 3 sessions per week for 40 minutes for the treatment group while the control group will remain the same. After the end of 6 weeks, the post-assessment of the child's Early Functional development will also be done. This indicates the effectiveness of AAC devices in the communication of children with Cerebral Palsy. The use of AAC methods could help to reduce aggressiveness among children with cerebral palsy. Moreover, AAC-based information and tools enable them to create environments that will support or enhance the ability of people with complex communication needs to interact with family members, peers, teachers, and others.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Communication Board on Functional Communication of Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06407349
Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy With And Without Cross Education In Cerebral Palsy
NCT06522464
Whole Body Vibration Effect on Trunk Control, Functional Performance and Selective Control
NCT06461845
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05463159
Effect of Mother Rehabilitative Aid Education Program on Children With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
NCT06460688
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Even though some individuals with these challenges will be effectively supported by assistance from other people, such as teachers, caregivers, community workers, and family friends, there will be some who are underserved due to the lack of rehabilitation specialists in low-income countries. (2) Cerebral Palsy has a neurogenic origin leading to physical impairment in children or may be caused by maternal (perinatal, natal, and postnatal injuries). The common types of cerebral palsy are spastic, flaccid, ataxic, or mixed types, determined by the site of the lesion in the brain. It adversely affects gross and fine motor development, receptive-expressive language skills, speech (articulation), voice (intensity, pitch, and quality), and fluency, depending on etiology. (3) The prevalence of CP in the United States ranges from 3-4 per 1000 live births.
Within the 2009-16 period, the prevalence of CP in children matured 3-17 a long time was 3.2 per 1000. The prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) and preterm in live births are altogether higher (40-100/1000). According to a study in Swabi, Pakistan, the prevalence of CP is 1.22 per 1000 live births. However, country-wide statistics are not found but 6.9% incidence of CP children admission in a Lahore hospital out of the 6.7% pediatric neurological admissions.
Research suggests evidence of the impact of the use of AAC-implemented intervention on 9 children in rural Kenya who have complex communication needs. The intervention used mainly low- tech materials that were specifically designed to strengthen the child's communication while remembering the caregiver's natural expertise. A pretest-posttest design was used in this study. Data were gathered using an adapted version of the Communication Profile, which was based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Qualitative analysis was conducted in the final section of the study. The data provided evidence of statistically significant positive changes in the communication of children with cerebral palsy at the levels of Body Structure Function and Activities. Also, the analysis revealed the positive perception of parents regarding AAC. (2) OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effects of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children with Cerebral Palsy. HYPOTHESES NULL HYPOTHESIS Ho= Augmentative and alternative communication is not an effective intervention for children with cerebral palsy.
ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS H A =Augmentative and alternative communication is an effective intervention for children with cerebral palsy. STUDY DESIGN Randomized Control trials
SETTING Rising Sun Institute for Special Children
DURATION OF THE STUDY 6 months after the approval of the synopsis
SAMPLE SIZE This sample is 16 according to the literature review. STUDY GROUPS Group A: Treatment Group will consist of 8 children with cerebral palsy. Group B: Control Group will consist of 8 children with cerebral palsy.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE Simple Random Sampling Technique
DATA COLLECTION TOOL Dysarthric Profile will be used for assessment purposes and a low-tech Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for the intervention.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
According to the inclusion criteria, 16 children will be recruited. The children will be assigned into groups. The randomly selected groups will be allocated 8 children as the control group and 8 as the treatment/ interventional group. A pre-assessment of the child's Early Functional development will be done. After that, the low-tech intervention will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week for 40 minutes) to the treatment group while the control group will remain the same. After the end of 6 weeks, the post-assessment of the child's Early Functional development will be done. This indicates the effectiveness of AAC in the communication of children with Cerebral Palsy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Augmentative Alternative Communication
Traditional treatment
Augmentative Alternative Communication
Traditional Method
Augmentative Alternative Communication Device
3 sessions per week for 40 minutes
Augmentative Alternative Communication Device
Augmentative Alternative Communication Device 3 session for 40 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Augmentative Alternative Communication
Traditional Method
Augmentative Alternative Communication Device
Augmentative Alternative Communication Device 3 session for 40 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
3 Years
15 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nazia Mumtaz
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sibgha Shafique
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2723 Sibgha
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.