Effects OF NMES With and Without Dynamic Bracing on Spasticity and Movement Quality in CP
NCT ID: NCT06303336
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-30
2024-05-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Additional Effects of Kinesiotape and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Hand Activity.
NCT05304676
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05463159
Post Facilitation Stretch, Post Isometric Relaxation and Myofascial Release in Spastic Cerebral Palsy.
NCT06686719
Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Ball Balancing
NCT06673849
Pelvic Neuromuscular Facilitation and Swiss Ball Exercises on Trunk Control in Children With Diaplegic CP
NCT05460923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
NMES (Neuromuscular and Muscular Electrical Stimulation) is an instrument that provides electrical impulses to nerves, causing muscles to contract, while dynamic bracing use muscle power to pre-compress soft tissue to produce the high forces required to control specific pathological diseases.
The hip adductors, the knee flexor muscles, and the ankle and foot muscles (gastrocnemius and soleus may experience increased tone, causing the ankles to be held in a plantar-flexed (pointed downward) position) are targeted with NMES in the lower extremity to reduce the spasticity \& improve the quality of movement in CP children. Investigating how combining NMES with dynamic bracing benefits lumbar disc bulge patients adds to the growing body of evidence supporting multimodal treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NMES with Dynamic Bracing
The NMES targeting the hip adductors, the knee flexor muscles and the ankle \& foot muscles, along with dynamic bracing
NMES with Dynamic Bracing
The group will receive NMES along with dynamic bracing
NMES without Dynamic Bracing
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator targeting the lower extremity
NMES without Dynamic Bracing
The participants will receive NMES on the lower extremity
Dynamic Bracing Only
Dynamic Bracing of lower extremity
Dynamic Bracing Only
This group will receive dynamic bracing only on the lower limb.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NMES with Dynamic Bracing
The group will receive NMES along with dynamic bracing
NMES without Dynamic Bracing
The participants will receive NMES on the lower extremity
Dynamic Bracing Only
This group will receive dynamic bracing only on the lower limb.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to walk with or without an assistive device. Classification as level I-II on the Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS).
* Able to stand with or without support for 1 minute.
* Classification as levels I-III on the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS); and the ability to follow and accept verbal instructions.
* Muscle tone scored ≥2, according to Modified Ashworth Scale.
Exclusion Criteria
* Treatment with botulinum toxin in the calf muscles within the previous 6 months
* Presence of structural deformities at the lower limbs and trunk, or instability in the ankle joint, which could compromise the child's safety and performance of the motor task
* Severe affective or psychiatric impairments;
* Serious vision or hearing problems
* Any neurological impairment (epilepsy or any other disease that would interfere with physical activity)
5 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayesha Ashraf, MS NMPT*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ripha International Univerisity
Ammara Abbas, tDPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children Hospital
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/0258 Ayesha Ashraf
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.